Release All Files! - Part 1

[Kurokage]

I don't have links ... but I seem to remember multiple accusations of that ... him walking into dressing rooms at pageants.   The girls could have been lying, I suppose.  But to what end?   They weren't asking for money or fame for being a victim.  They were just ex-pageant girls/women with similar stories.    There is zero proof to their claims but I believe them.   It goes along with his serial adulterer personality.

(Carroll, on the other hand, I don't believe.   
She is a nutjob, couldn't remember details, had no evidence, and was out for fame and money.)

It would go along with Trump being a serial sexual predator rather than someone who abused very young children, say under 12.

Though most see it (I think Trump included) as power rather than sexual gratification. I think he got kicks out having access to young women when other's weren't aloud.
I see it as he knew what Epstein was up to, and if he got a 'happy' moment from say a 16-18 year old as part of of the privilege, it wouldn't surprise me.

Some commentators out there say Epstein went for even younger, if that's true, maybe that's when Trump wanted out. Hence the 'falling out'

But that's just my opinion of what I think went on.

[bastion]

Copy and paste document text to reveal what is 'hidden' by the marker/redaction as the raw text underneath is fully intact.

I'm against removing redactions that could identify victims but the whole redaction process in the docs was done by an idiot using an easilly reversible non-destructive process.

[Oldcarpy2]

Copy and paste document text to reveal what is 'hidden' by the marker/redaction as the raw text underneath is fully intact.

I'm against removing redactions that could identify victims but the whole redaction process in the docs was done by an idiot using an easilly reversible non-destructive process.

I'm no techie.  Does that apply to all of them?

In the olden days, I used to deal with redacted documents done with black marker pen.  That didn't work well either.

[Maxmars]

Copy and paste document text to reveal what is 'hidden' by the marker/redaction as the raw text underneath is fully intact.

I'm against removing redactions that could identify victims but the whole redaction process in the docs was done by an idiot using an easilly reversible non-destructive process.

Aside from privacy (reputation protection,) redactions are only necessary when evidentiary information is 'considered' to be irrelevant and immaterial to the specific legal proceeding.

The information is not to be "scoured' or "destroyed"... it must be retrievable... or the redaction process would be destroying evidence... rather than limiting it's distribution.

In fact, you could make an interesting analysis of who and what has been redacted, when it was redacted, and who did it... (maybe crimes within crimes)... I guess.

[andy06shake]

I'm no techie.  Does that apply to all of them?

In the olden days, I used to deal with redacted documents done with black marker pen.  That didn't work well either.

It's because they were using the free version of the Adobe software, combined with improper redaction techniques.

[cherokeetroy]

Epstein's plane was nicknamed "Lolita Express"

Fellow billionaire Ron Burkle had a jet nicknamed "Air F*** One"

I doubt the flights were sales pitches for timeshares 

[quintessentone]

Speaking slower will only make you look even more dumber than you already are!

Again, you decide to ignore the fact that a young named contestant in a Teen USA pageant said Trump had walked into the changing room, whilst multiple girls were undressed.

But you keep up the victim blaming if it makes you feel better!!

There was one named contestant and three others who were interviewed by many different journalists, there were an additional three or four other teens who were too afraid to come forward. Many still don't want to come forward to protect their families and may still be dealing with rape PTSD which they don't want to relive.

The same applies to the Epstein models and sex trafficked survivors, many are too afraid to come forward. 

Trump's ass needs to hauled into a courtroom for questioning and investigation as to his predatory behaviour and for him to prove he didn't rape any young children that Epstein was trafficking, and where the girls name Trump as their rapist.

[FlyersFan]

... and for him to prove he didn't rape any young children that Epstein was trafficking,

Doesn't work that way, skippy.   
He doesn't have to prove innocence. 
(unless he is formally charged).
He is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.   
It's up to a prosecutor to prove him guilty.
Not the other way around.

[quintessentone]

Doesn't work that way, skippy.   
He doesn't have to prove innocence. 
(unless he is formally charged).
He is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.   
It's up to a prosecutor to prove him guilty.
Not the other way around.

His ass needs to be hauled into a courtroom for any of that to happen, that's my point, haul his ass in for investigative questioning and for him to answer to those girls that accused him of raping them.

[cherokeetroy]

Link