Release All Files! - Part 1

[cherokeetroy]

If this survivor account is true, it corroborates rumors of an elevator in the Epstein island temple leading to underground tunnels 

Link

[chr0naut]

Fake.

Hmm, possibly. But it is only 'the White House' that are saying it.

But Trump has said, for ages, that the Epstein files should be released and that he would have them released if he became President again.

Then Trump became President again and wasn't releasing them, despite Bondi saying she had them on her desk.

Then Trump said they weren't being released because there were no Epstein files.

Then the Congressional Committee started releasing the files that Trump said did not exist.

Then Trump claimed that the Epstein files were a hoax by the Democrats (despite the whole idea coming very clearly from his Qanon & MAGA base, and his very very public buy-in to it all).

Then Trump, under pressure from his base, a week or so ago, gave an executive order to release the files, but that order had caveats & stipulations that meant his administration could defer releasing some information for numerous reasons, and could tie those releases up in court almost indefinitely. i.e. the order gave Trump control over what is released and what isn't (which he didn't have prior to the EO).

And since then, there have been two more releases of Epstein files that, while they are not absolutely incriminating and are heavily redacted, have shown clearly and undisputedly that Trump has lied about his involvement with Epstein, and lied about his knowledge of Epstein's activities before they became public knowledge.

And now 'the White House' is claiming that the released files are fake.

The number of times he changes his stories are more revealing than the files themselves have been.

[Byrd]

...and then there's the VERY clumsy redacting of materials....

https://www.thedailybeast.com/internet-s...edactions/

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/po...s-doj.html

For clarification, what someone did was go through the files, highlight the words (in Word or a similar word processor) and then change the background color to black (so a black space with black typeface).  Copying and pasting into Notebook (which doesn't use any visual properties -- it's just plain old text) reveals what was hidden on the black background.

This.... is just abysmally ignorant but we should be grateful for the ineptitude that allows us to see behind the curtain.

[DBCowboy]

...and then there's the VERY clumsy redacting of materials....

https://www.thedailybeast.com/internet-s...edactions/

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/po...s-doj.html

For clarification, what someone did was go through the files, highlight the words (in Word or a similar word processor) and then change the background color to black (so a black space with black typeface).  Copying and pasting into Notebook (which doesn't use any visual properties -- it's just plain old text) reveals what was hidden on the black background.

This.... is just abysmally ignorant but we should be grateful for the ineptitude that allows us to see behind the curtain.

Maybe they're doing it on purpose at the DoJ

[SomeStupidName]

Crazy how collection 8 was there but not listed. I did read some document talking about how the government violated the 4th amendment rights of Maxwell to obtain a warrant illegally hope she doesn't get awarded a misstrial. I'm starting to think she might have been the mossad agent and the brains of the honey pot operation.

[chr0naut]

Wrong again.

Trump was never convicted of rape.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING
DEFENDANT’S RULE 59 MOTION

It's hilarious how you guys are wrong Every. Fucking. Time.

In fact, ABC had to pay Trump $15 million for a defamation lawsuit because George Stephanopoulos said basically the same thing you are saying on the air.

We should be getting apologies every time you guys are wrong but we never do.

The ABC settled. The case never went to decision.

Trump did not 'win' the case. Trump had sued for $25 million but the final pay-out was $15 million.

Would that not be admission of some sort of defeat if he was actually able to get $25 million?

Trump has a history of vexatious litigancy, and would have tied the ABC up in court, with all the costs involved, for ages.

My guess is that the ABC just wanted to cut their losses.

As per the previous linked legal decision in this post, Trump would have lost his case, but that doesn't stop him from appealing, and now he is President he can bring in public opinion and political influence in on any case he puts - the very definition of political corruption.

He accuses everyone else of lawfare, but he is the master of it.

[chr0naut]

FBI says the Epstein postcard about Trump is fake.
I think it talks about Trump and nubile young girls .. something like that.

HERE

I would think that someone faking Epstein's writing would have studied and practiced it until it was indistinguishable.

The handwriting on the card is similar enough in some regards and different enough in others to have been written by the same person in a different situation.

https://x.com/davidenrich/status/2003575023223833073

[KrustyKrab]

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING
DEFENDANT’S RULE 59 MOTION


The ABC settled. The case never went to decision.

Trump did not 'win' the case. Trump had sued for $25 million but the final pay-out was $15 million.

Would that not be admission of some sort of defeat if he was actually able to get $25 million?

Trump has a history of vexatious litigancy, and would have tied the ABC up in court, with all the costs involved, for ages.

My guess is that the ABC just wanted to cut their losses.

As per the previous linked legal decision in this post, Trump would have lost his case, but that doesn't stop him from appealing, and now he is President he can bring in public opinion and political influence in on any case he puts - the very definition of political corruption.

He accuses everyone else of lawfare, but he is the master of it.

Judge’s opinion doesn’t mean shit. It’s no different than mine or yours.  He wasn’t even tried for rape, besides she had absolutely ZERO proof of anything. He was convicted of a civil suit on hearsay.   The whole trial was a sham.  You should read the facts of the case and then make an unbiased and educated decision.   No unbiased, court could’ve or would’ve ever found him guilty of rape without no evidence.  You can take that to the bank.

[BeyondKnowledge]

Just saw this and haven't tested it.

[Bush Master]

Three different women have directly accused Trump of committing sexual acts with them while they were minors and have taken those allegations to court.

At least 25 have accused him of 'perving on' undressed and partially dressed underage models. Some others have accused Trump of making direct lewd suggestions to them, attempting to initiate sex, while they were underage.

Trump has been convicted of charges of rape and sexual impropriety in more than one case, against more than just one woman. A fact that he also denies.

Two men have testified that Trump was engaged in sexual misconduct (getting hand jobs from underage girls) at a 'party' organized by Epstein, and that they also attended.

Similar to Nixon's "White House Plumbers" the "Gemstones", Trump no doubt has had crews of operatives who have been doing 'damage control' and 'cleaning his history' on his behalf, for years.

It would be gullible to assume that every Presidential candidate going back decades has not had similar operatives working in the background.

I would hope my President would chop down a few cherry trees as they go along.