Release All Files! - Part 1

[CriticalStinker]

I absolutely believe this.

They all want to get Trump so badly, they can taste it. 

And it still continues to this day.

Epstein was a self admitted coward, why wouldn't he have implicated Trump to save his own ass?

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...5ee51d.jpg]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...ad197d.jpg]

Sounds like a good line to have for someone in prison for life, and also a key suspect in anything that happened to Epstein.

Sometimes deals are made with someone charged with crimes if they can help convict someone bigger than them... But I don't think an AG could let Epstein walk just for implicating one other person. Even if the person was president, the whole ring was Epstein, he was the big fish. But I don't think I've heard of someone convicted of serious charges getting let loose just because they said so and so did something. You have to be able to convict.

I think the reality is, neither party wanted the Epstein case to become bigger than it was, because it likely implicates people on both sides.

Or, we could just believe that all the cameras were magically not working, guards were asleep, and a high profile inmate killed themselves after repeatedly reaching out concerned of their own safety. Because trusting the government is cool as long as it's the party we trust... They've never steered us wrong, lol.

[chr0naut]

Because some of the files contain child porn from Epstein, a democrat.

It is clear from some of Epstein's e-mails, that he thought that he might get a role in Trump's government.

Epstein also contributed money to the Republican campaigns, as well as the Democrat campaigns. I would suspect, on the basis of his e-mails, that he was apolitical and was just trying to ingratiate himself to both sides.

And one thing that several congressional panel members have commented on is the absence of child pornography in the Epstein files. The files don't appear to contain evidence that would unambiguously implicate any one, even Epstein himself.

Survivors search the Jeffrey Epstein files but find no sign of their evidence

Why would you WANT to expose children that were sex-trafficked by democrats?

No one wants the victims to be further victimized, but they are no longer children.

And as far as trafficking of underage people who were sexually exploited, Epstein didn't run international teen modelling agencies and pageants. Guess who did?

Could Epstein be a client on someone else's list? Who might that have been?

Another thing is that all the instances of sexual misconduct by Epstein (and Maxwell) that have been made public have occurred before Epstein's original conviction in 2008. It really looks to me like the post 2008 accusations against Epstein were re-prosecution of the same crimes for which he was convicted in 2008. My guess is that the prosecution's case against him may not have been successful and a court trial would have given Epstein a platform to release evidence and testimony that directly implicates Trump. That is why he was executed before going to trial (it would make more sense for someone who was guilty to commit suicide after conviction, rather than before).

But hey, you believe Trump as, again and again, his lies in regard to the Epstein case are exposed. They are mounting up and are becoming more and more obvious. His lies and attempts to thwart release and deny their content are becoming stronger public evidence than the files are.

[cherokeetroy]

Link

[KrustyKrab]

It is clear from some of Epstein's e-mails, that he thought that he might get a role in Trump's government.

Epstein also contributed money to the Republican campaigns, as well as the Democrat campaigns. I would suspect, on the basis of his e-mails, that he was apolitical and was just trying to ingratiate himself to both sides.

And one thing that several congressional panel members have commented on is the absence of child pornography in the Epstein files. The files don't appear to contain evidence that would unambiguously implicate any one, even Epstein himself.


No one wants the victims to be further victimized, but they are no longer children.

And as far as trafficking of underage people who were sexually exploited, Epstein didn't run international teen modelling agencies and pageants. Guess who did?

Could Epstein be a client on someone else's list? Who might that have been?

Another thing is that all the instances of sexual misconduct by Epstein (and Maxwell) that have been made public have occurred before Epstein's original conviction in 2008. It really looks to me like the post 2008 accusations against Epstein were re-prosecution of the same crimes for which he was convicted in 2008. My guess is that the prosecution's case against him may not have been successful and a court trial would have given Epstein a platform to release evidence and testimony that directly implicates Trump. That is why he was executed before going to trial (it would make more sense for someone who was guilty to commit suicide after conviction, rather than before).

But hey, you believe Trump as, again and again, his lies in regard to the Epstein case are exposed. They are mounting up and are becoming more and more obvious. His lies and attempts to thwart release and deny their content are becoming stronger public evidence than the files are.

It is clear from some of Epstein's e-mails, that he thought that he might get a role in Trump's government.

Epstein also contributed money to the Republican campaigns, as well as the Democrat campaigns. I would suspect, on the basis of his e-mails, that he was apolitical and was just trying to ingratiate himself to both sides.
 

Care to shares those emails? I haven’t gone through the files and have no plans to. But interested in what email you’re talking about.   I knew Trump disliked him and wanted nothing to do with him.  He didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of being any part of the Trump administration, so…… curious about the emails you speak of.  
 

No one wants the victims to be further victimized, but they are no longer children.

Ahhhh that’s the elephant in the room isn’t it?  As far as I’m aware none of those girls have said Trump was doing inappropriate things with them nor have they implied that Trump was in cahoots with Epstein’s trafficking business.  And as sure as a bear poops in the woods one of those girls could be an instant millionaire if they would just come out and incriminate Trump, that hasn’t happened….and you know damn well that if Trump had assaulted one of them in any way they’d speak out and the dems would gladly pay for it.   














 

 

[FlyersFan]

FBI says the Epstein postcard about Trump is fake.
I think it talks about Trump and nubile young girls .. something like that.

HERE

[cherokeetroy]

Miami Herald

[ANNEE]

FBI says the Epstein postcard about Trump is fake.
I think it talks about Trump and nubile young girls .. something like that.

HERE

I think that's funny.

"TRUMP'S" FBI -- not just FBI but "TRUMPS" FBI

Reported by the Daily Mail -- a RW mag.
 

• Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing.
  

[FlyersFan]

Reported by the Daily Mail -- a RW mag.

So what?
They reported that the FBI said it is fake.
It's accurate reporting.
That's what the FBI said.

I have no idea if the post card is really fake or if it's really real.
They all lie ...  
Trump lies.  Biden lies.   Clinton lies.
The FBI lies for whoever is in office at the time.
Trumps FBI lies.  Bidens FBI lies.   Etc etc

As I've said a hundred times before .... can't trust any of them.

[FlyersFan]

Since there was WHINING about the source .... here are a bunch  more all saying the same thing that the FBI says the NASSAR postcard/letter was fake.   I have no idea if it's really fake or not .... but that's what the FBI is saying.

The Hill
https://thehill.com/homenews/5661621-fak...rd-nassar/

NPR
https://www.kunr.org/npr-news/2025-12-23...tion-trump

KellieMeyer News
https://x.com/KellieMeyerNews/status/200...5511750825

Crossroads Today
https://www.crossroadstoday.com/news/pol...8d90b.html

The Standard (London?)
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/je...63812.html

TMZ
https://www.tmz.com/2025/12/23/larry-nas...files-doj/

[RazorV66]

Since there was WHINING about the source .... here are a bunch  more all saying the same thing that the FBI says the NASSAR postcard/letter was fake.   I have no idea if it's really fake or not .... but that's what the FBI is saying.

The Hill
https://thehill.com/homenews/5661621-fak...rd-nassar/

NPR
https://www.kunr.org/npr-news/2025-12-23...tion-trump

KellieMeyer News
https://x.com/KellieMeyerNews/status/200...5511750825

Crossroads Today
https://www.crossroadstoday.com/news/pol...8d90b.html

The Standard (London?)
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/je...63812.html

TMZ
https://www.tmz.com/2025/12/23/larry-nas...files-doj/

These guys are so gullible, they will believe anything as long as it makes Trump out to be guilty.

I work for the USPS and I have seen mail going to and coming from prisoners in county, state and federal prisons. 

They ALWAYS have the inmate's ID number on the outside of the envelope without fail, incoming or outgoing mail.

There is the actual picture of the envelope in that file release, no inmate ID number for either Epstein or Nassar.

Not to mention its postmarked 3 days after Epstein died.

It's complete bullshit.