27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-20-2025, 08:35 AM)quintessentone Wrote: Bondi follows Trump's orders and she does not act with any autonomy or has her own authority in decision-making, so locking her up does not solve the problem.
In addition to following established laws concerning numerous things. From state jurisdictions to victims rights laws.
Why doesn’t the lawyers working the Epstein case under Biden come forward.
57 |
10,155 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

12-20-2025, 08:46 AM
This post was last modified: 12-20-2025, 08:47 AM by quintessentone. 
(12-20-2025, 08:45 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: In addition to following established laws concerning numerous things. From state jurisdictions to victims rights laws.
Why doesn’t the lawyers working the Epstein case under Biden come forward.
Why doesn't Trump release all the files unredacted except for protecting the survivors identities?
"The only journey is the one within."
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(12-20-2025, 08:41 AM)Kurokage Wrote: ... to see how high up this thing goes.
We already know it goes all the way up to the Oval Office for both the Democrats and Republicans.
Filthy buggers ... all of them.
But yeah .. make an official commission with both sides on it and have at it.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-20-2025, 05:53 AM)andy06shake Wrote: If that's the case lets hope nondisclosure sinks their battleship.
Currently, though, the buck stops with Trump as he's your POTUS.
And has the power to release those files any time he pleases.
He's the sitting president, and Trump has broad authority to declassify and order the release of federal files.
Let’s clear some things up for you.
While presidents can declassify executive branch information under their Article II powers, this does not extend to judicial records.
Presidential Records Act and executive privilege apply ONLY to executive branch records, not court-sealed ones.
The judiciary controls its own records and proceedings.
The president lacks inherent authority to unseal judicial materials, as this would intrude on the court’s domain.
Separation of Powers.
Look it up.
No kings here, despite what the media and this OP suggests.
305 |
6,451 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

12-20-2025, 08:53 AM
This post was last modified: 12-20-2025, 08:54 AM by putnam6. 
(12-20-2025, 08:17 AM)quintessentone Wrote:
![[Image: 91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif) ![[Image: 91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif) ![[Image: 91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/91cac29e481512817349e279c6b2b577.gif)
If only your journey within was more covert...
If we can get back close to the same zip code as the original topic...
Im reminded of one of Dad's favorite refrains.
It's a little late to do the right thing now...
The overall effect of its release being piecemeal is to exacerbate the public's growing fatigue with the Epstein file release and to lower the already low basic trust in our government to subterranean levels.
Until someone sorts through all the releases and we get all the evidence, it will be nothing but seeing evidence without context, and more innuendo disguised as investigation.
Using the Epstein files release carrot as a constant campaign talking point should have never happened and curtailed after July 13th; hell, it could be what Butler was all about
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
62 |
2,165 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-20-2025, 08:46 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: We already know it goes all the way up to the Oval Office for both the Democrats and Republicans.
Filthy buggers ... all of them.
But yeah .. make an official commission with both sides on it and have at it.
It's about the only way forward now without making one side appear more guilty than the other without actual facts.
At the end of the day, both sides are using it as political p*ssing contest and trying to look less corrupted.
Trump should never have used it as a campaign promise as it makes him look guilty no matter what happens now.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
57 |
10,155 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-20-2025, 08:53 AM)putnam6 Wrote: [Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...b2b577.gif][Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...b2b577.gif][Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...b2b577.gif][Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...b2b577.gif]
If only your journey within was more covert...
If we can get back close to the same zip code as the original topic...
Im reminded of one of Dad's favorite refrains.
It's a little late to do the right thing now...
The overall effect of its release being piecemeal is to exacerbate the public's growing fatigue with the Epstein file release and to lower the already low basic trust in our government to subterranean levels.
Until someone sorts through all the releases and we get all the evidence, it will be nothing but seeing evidence without context, and more innuendo disguised as investigation.
Using the Epstein files release carrot as a constant campaign talking point should have never happened and curtailed after July 13th; hell, it could be what Butler was all about
See now if it were covert I wouldn't elicit the knee jerk reactions which cause loose lips that sink ships.
We all agree that Trump's actions here stinks worse than he does.
"The only journey is the one within."
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-20-2025, 08:53 AM)Kurokage Wrote: It's about the only way forward now without making one side appear more guilty than the other without actual facts.
At the end of the day, both sides are using it as political p*ssing contest and trying to look less corrupted.
Trump should never have used it as a campaign promise as it makes him look guilty no matter what happens now.
He looks guilty? LoL
That’s just Democrat and media spin.
If you actually pay attention, the media occasionally, even if hidden, has to admit the truth…
“Mr. Epstein had a talent for acquiring powerful friends, some of whom have become ensnared in the continuing scrutiny of his crimes. For months, Mr. Trump has labored furiously to shift himself out of the frame, dismissing questions about his relationship with Mr. Epstein as a "Democrat hoax" and imploring his supporters to ignore the matter entirely. An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein's abuse and trafficking of minors.”
-The New York Times, December 18, 2025
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(12-20-2025, 09:04 AM)Vermilion Wrote: He looks guilty? LoL
That’s just Democrat and media spin.
No. I'm not a democrat (nor am I republican) and
I'm saying Trump looks guilty as hell for how this
has been handled. (so does Biden, btw)
57 |
10,155 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

12-20-2025, 09:11 AM
This post was last modified: 12-20-2025, 09:12 AM by quintessentone. 
(12-20-2025, 09:04 AM)Vermilion Wrote: He looks guilty? LoL
That’s just Democrat and media spin.
If you actually pay attention, the media occasionally, even if hidden, has to admit the truth…
“Mr. Epstein had a talent for acquiring powerful friends, some of whom have become ensnared in the continuing scrutiny of his crimes. For months, Mr. Trump has labored furiously to shift himself out of the frame, dismissing questions about his relationship with Mr. Epstein as a "Democrat hoax" and imploring his supporters to ignore the matter entirely. An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein's abuse and trafficking of minors.”
-The New York Times, December 18, 2025
One has to ask what public data did the New York Times investigate compared to what was never released into the public for scrutiny?
I think Congress needs to first receive all remaining unredacted Epstein files, in addition to Epstein Estate data, and look everything over for themselves 'for the people' to come to a bipartisan conclusion and then arrest those suspects that are named by the survivors that were brave enough to come forward (there are a total of 1,200 survivors that are known so far) and which also link them to evidence from those investigations. They need evidence 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to move forward and Trump isn't giving it to them.
"The only journey is the one within."
|