Release All Files! - Part 1

[WallFlowerActive]

For some niggling reason, I doubt throwing money at the survivors is what they mean by justice being done.

And yet you have to lie about the context.  Do you understand that what was cited was civil actions through the courts as settlements which is nothing like throwing money at the victims.

[quintessentone]

And yet you have to lie about the context.  Do you understand that what was cited was civil actions through the courts as settlements which is nothing like throwing money at the victims.

Settlements for 125 survivors, there are 1,200 and counting, how does that pass for any type of justice when the survivors' whole lives of trauma will never be fixed with cash or the recurring trauma of publicity and those responsible for raping and/or torturing them as children getting away with it?

[Oldcarpy2]

And I can cite you sources that claim to prove the earth is flat on the “internet”

And what documents are those.  Do you have an example of actual DOJ redactions being broken instead of people confusing the documents from the US Virgin Island civil suit.

You can lead a horse to water.......

[quintessentone]

You can lead a horse to water.......

That goes both ways, but if anyone bothers to do a deeper dive, yes, the civil case was redacted, plus other Epstein documents but they are hesitant to speak on those because they can't figure out the context with those, whereas with a court document it is easier to do so.

[UltraBudgie]

You can lead a horse to water.......

No, it's a good point—there's documents from many different sources in there, and the ones I've seen anyway that are poorly redacted were not done by DoJ. I've looked a bit for others (not much) but didn't find any.

I would have given WallFlowerActive's post a like except for the gratuitous globehead propaganda.

[Vermilion]

It's all over the Internet.  The DOJ used the non premium version of Adobe for all the redactions.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder...d-to-know/

So you’re saying the government totally screwed up releasing the files and now screwed up with the redactions but somehow, miraculously, seemed to still succeed in covering up your claims of Trump’s guilt?
LoL

Fascinating.

[Oldcarpy2]

So you’re saying the government totally screwed up releasing the files and now screwed up with the redactions but somehow, miraculously, seemed to still succeed in covering up your claims of Trump’s guilt?
LoL

Fascinating.

Don't put words in my mouth.  I have made no claims of Trump's "guilt".

We don't know until we might have full transparency.

Simple as that.

But the whole thing stinks.

The Epstein files didn't exist and were just a Democrat hoax?

Yeah, you bought that one.



There are a lot more documents yet to be disclosed so let's see.

[WallFlowerActive]

I would have given WallFlowerActive's post a like except for the gratuitous globehead propaganda.

How is stating simple facts propaganda.  Pointing out the usual suspects still being blinded by context because of TDS.

Again.  If there is actual evidence showing Trump was involved in actual criminal activity with Epstein, let Trump hang.  But that would still put the people of the Biden administration and past prosecutors like Comey’s daughter where Comey was a past director of the FBI on the spot.

The Epstein file law was more from TDS than anything sensible. With little regards for the actual victims.  If the law makers were serious, the Epstein law would have established: One, special oversight or a committee over the document release.  Two. Gave as much immunity and whistle blower powers to past Epstein prosecutors as possible.  Three.  Made allowed to get as many depositions from Epstein victims like we have seen in senate hearings.  Four.  Made a actual budget to staff up make a serious attempt at timelines.

I don’t like any politician.  And this thing other than the real suffering of victims is a farce and political theatrics.

[cherokeetroy]

Or they just a deep state agent from some government / country trying to kill the credibility of conspiracy sites?

Isn't it kinda funny how all the sudden, MAGA is accusing the members who criticize Trump of being paid shills or "deep state agents"

Is that the modern version of screaming Heretic in the hope of getting anti-Trump accounts suspended?

Whatever it takes to silence the dissenting voice, huh..

[WallFlowerActive]

Isn't it kinda funny how all the sudden, MAGA is accusing the members who criticize Trump of being paid shills or "deep state agents"

Is that the modern version of screaming Heretic in the hope of getting anti-Trump accounts suspended?

Whatever it takes to silence the dissenting voice, huh..

At least I’m not like you and use known fake pictures and where you try to hide the history of that image.  You have no credibility.

Added.  Where I try to understand full context.