New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[quintessentone]

You know what's ironic in all this? At least as far as I see, while a part of the US population, or so is said, is using rethorics such as "our country is being taken over by immigrants!", they seem somewhat fine with their own fellow citizen women being shot in the head for being stupid, or so is said.

Do I have to remind some that a human population growth rate is dependent to the number of fertile and soon-to-be fertile female? Of course, if a country start killing their "fertile white women", then white people will drastically decreases in the following generations within said country.

Many others are questioning why government will not allow a civil lawsuit to go forward, because DISCOVERY, that's why.

Others are questioning why the two last shots into her head at point blank range?

It is reported that an ICE agent slapped a woman's phone out of her hand while she was filming them and he said to her "Haven't you learned anything".

[KrustyKrab]

I am trying to incite critical thinking here on DI, but to no avail it appears.

You’re failing miserably at it.   
​​​​​​​

“I thought this might help you…..

​​​​​​​Here is what matters ..based on law, not emotion:
• She disobeyed lawful commands from federal law enforcement
• She obstructed an active ICE operation
• She remained in the driver’s seat of a vehicle, which courts consistently recognize as a potential deadly weapon
• She pressed the accelerator while officers were positioned in front of the vehicle
• She did not stop, surrender, or comply despite multiple opportunities
She had options.
She could have:
✔️ Stopped the vehicle
✔️ Turned off the engine
✔️ Put her hands up
✔️ Exited the vehicle
✔️ Complied with commands
She chose none of those.
Instead, she chose to:
❌ Obstruct
❌ Disobey
❌ Move the vehicle while officers were in immediate danger
⚖️ WHAT THE LAW SAYS
? Vehicle as a Deadly Weapon
Federal courts have repeatedly held that a motor vehicle can constitute a deadly weapon when used against officers.
• United States v. Anchrum, 590 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2009)
• United States v. Sanchez, 914 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2019)
? Use of Deadly Force Standard
Law enforcement is permitted to use deadly force when an officer has probable cause to believe a suspect poses an immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death.
• Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
? Objective Reasonableness Standard
Use of force is judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, not with hindsight.
• Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
? Obstruction & Assault of Federal Officers
• 18 U.S.C. § 111 — Assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers
• 18 U.S.C. § 1501 — Obstruction of federal process
? Failure to Comply During Lawful Detention
Refusal to comply during a lawful federal enforcement action escalates legal exposure and justifies force escalation when safety is threatened.
• DOJ Use-of-Force Policy (Revised 2021–2024)”

[quintessentone]

You’re failing miserably at it.   
​​​​​​​ ​​​​​​​

I know, it's the peanut crowd that is particularly hard to crack.

[FlyersFan]

Others are questioning why the two last shots into her head at point blank range?

You listen to stupid people.
The video shows they were not at 'point blank range'.
You don't even know what that means, do you.

[KrustyKrab]

You know what's ironic in all this? At least as far as I see, while a part of the US population, or so is said, is using rethorics such as "our country is being taken over by immigrants!", they seem somewhat fine with their own fellow citizen women being shot in the head for being stupid, or so is said.

Do I have to remind some that a human population growth rate is dependent to the number of fertile and soon-to-be fertile female? Of course, if a country start killing their "fertile white women", then white people will drastically decreases in the following generations within said country.

So you’re okay with muderers, rapist, child molestors, gang members, drug dealers, etc….being in the country?  Got it, good to know.

[putnam6]

This is the "best" you people have? 

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...10e8bb.png]


That reaction and draw time is pretty average across the board for anyone who has as much training as he does. You know, all the training your source said he had from yesterday.   

You people are grasping at straws for nothingburgers that just make you look desperate. It's even funnier when your "article" is from 12 years ago  **Mod. snip**

The left's viewpoint is presented much more intelligently and rationally on X and Discord; it's a much broader footprint, and the DI Democrats' viewpoint is represented much less manically so

​​​​​​​
 

Overton

[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/196...bigger.jpg]
@overton_news
·
17h

Senator John Fetterman just said what the vast majority of the Democrat Party is INCAPABLE of admitting

about Minneapolis and immigration.

He even pulled out a piece of paper showing the percentage of criminals arrested by ICE to illustrate his point.

FETTERMAN: “What I am seeing it as it was a tragedy, I wish it never happened. I

think we can all agree on that.” “Really what’s happening… it’s like we step back,where we brought that to as a Democratic, when I arrived in the Senate back in 2023, it was clear we are failing at our border.”

“If you look at the kinds of things we’ve had, this is starting to happen.

This is from The New York Times, that’s encounters at our border and it was skyrocketing.” “That’s unsustainable, when you reach almost 300,000 people, that’s unsustainable and we need to… as a Democrat it shouldn’t be unreasonable to want to secure our border.” “Let’s also talk about ICE. Absolutely, again what happened in Minneapolis was absolutely tragic. If you think now this is from The Washington Post, this is the latest statistics, these are people that ICE [has arrested].” “67% have criminal charges, pending ones… that’s more than two thirds of the people.

[quintessentone]

You listen to stupid people.
The video shows they were not at 'point blank range'.
You don't even know what that means, do you.

Andrew Weissmann is not a stupid person, quite the contrary. It's not about stupidity, it's about confirmation bias and political tribalism in your country. I do not have a bone in your dog fight, I have independent opinions and speculations that I will continue to share on DI. If you don't like it, swipe on by.

I do know what it means to be sociopathic and psychotic, to not follow your training, to deliberately escalate a situation or orchestrate it so you can later claim self-defense, and execute someone in cold blood by watching the videos presented with a critical thinking mind.

[IgnorantGod]

So you’re okay with muderers, rapist, child molestors, gang members, drug dealers, etc….being in the country?  Got it, good to know.

Well, the thread is not about me, nor my ideologies, for whatever they are worth, which I'd assume not much, since an opinion is an opinion.

Now, I'm not really sure how that list of 'merry-goers' has to do with that particular woman? Unless there are evidence out of all reasonable doubt that she was funding or helping such?

[FlyersFan]

Andrew Weissmann is not a stupid person,...

Doesn't matter how close or far away the shots are.
Self defense is self defense.
To whine because they were from nearby .... STUPID.

[WallFlowerActive]

Andrew Weissmann is not a stupid person,

Still doesn’t mean they aren’t open to fairytales at a minimum..

Cottingley Fairies: How Sherlock Holmes's creator was fooled by hoax
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-55187973.amp

Or worse.  Willing to be a useful tool and idiot sacrificing truth for the means justifies the out come in warped lib minds.