0 |
148 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

I’m sorry but whatever the situation there is is abhorrent to have shot the woman. There was no need and absolutely no justification for it. I’m not a bleeding heart liberal and most would label my views as leaning strongly to the right. However, wrong is just wrong and this was plain wrong on every level.
307 |
6,505 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 02:46 AM)KrustyKrab Wrote: You forget “Or harm to others”
He shot her as she was moving forward a split second before she hit him, as you can see in the video. He acted out of self defense and eliminated the threat from possibly harming others.
This explains why the multiple shots.
“Police officers may use the double tap technique, which involves firing two shots in rapid succession at the same target to improve accuracy and effectiveness in stopping a threat. This technique is part of their training to ensure they can respond effectively in high-pressure situations.
[Image: https://duckduckgo.com/assets/icons/favi...ite.3x.png] Wikipedia[Image: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/...an.org.ico] americanrifleman.org”
5:10 mark
[Video: https://youtu.be/rwwgUiNVSmc?si=L5-lSBI_Mcndgrbt]
I like that he was fair. There were things the ICE agent could have done differently, but it wasn't criminally negligent.
EOD he still had a split second to make choices, sure he might have been able to step out of the way, or in trying to do so he could have slipped and Ms Good could have crushed his head like a coconut, wonder if that was the outcome would led to Ms Good having her own criminal and civil cases
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 10:23 AM)Kurokage Wrote: It may be a federal issue but could of been investigated by state
https://www.fox9.com/news/can-minnesota-...t-law-says
A total cover up by the FBI and ICE
Ellison is the Minnesota AG.
He's already on tape promising to cover up corruption.
He and Waltz have been indicted for covering up corruption and crime.
And you think he'd be impartial in an investigation, investigating him?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 10:37 AM)ARM1968 Wrote: I’m sorry but whatever the situation there is is abhorrent to have shot the woman. There was no need and absolutely no justification for it. I’m not a bleeding heart liberal and most would label my views as leaning strongly to the right. However, wrong is just wrong and this was plain wrong on every level.
She refused to stop the vehicle, she refused to get out of the car, she had been blocking impeding Federal agents all morning.
Assaults against Federal agents has increased over 3,000% in the last year.
I wouldn't piss on her grave.
My 2 cents.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 10:23 AM)Kurokage Wrote: It may be a federal issue but could of been investigated by state
https://www.fox9.com/news/can-minnesota-...t-law-says
A total cover up by the FBI and ICE
May be?
No.
It IS a federal issue regarding a federal cop during a federal law enforcement mission.
Also, based on the recent Minnesota track record with illegals, sanctuary cities, fraud, murder, etc, they can’t really be trusted anyway.
The FBI taking over a federal investigation has been the norm for forever.
The locals are always going to bitch about it too.
Do you not remember Sargent Al (LAPD) being upset when the FBI took over the operation at Nakatomi Plaza a few Christmases ago?
9 |
2,087 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 03:57 AM)Truthhurts Wrote: [Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...3f3c1f.png]
The cops let 90% of them in.
307 |
6,505 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Certainly, we all can agree that the ALREADY criminally convicted need to be deported, this should be
a bipartisan issue, right?
Our law enforcement already has an homegrown endless supply of this ilk
Say thier names, read their crimes they have been convicted of, how is it okay to shield these removals
Cant we remove the convicted criminals, without the left going into convulsions and fainting
IF not...
Quote:
Karen Kennedy reposted
[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/192...normal.jpg]
Bill Melugin
@BillMelugin_
·
18h
BREAKING: ICE has provided
@FoxNews
a list of the most egregious criminal aliens they've arrested during their surge in the sanctuary state of Minnesota, & it's the most disturbing list I've ever seen,
including numerous convicted child rapists/sodomizers & ten convicted killers, most with deportation orders going back many years. Several from Laos, Somalia, and Sudan.
WARNING GRAPHIC - Highlights below:
Sriudorn Phaivan, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of strong-arm sodomy of a boy & strong-arm sodomy of a girl with a deportation order since 2018.
Tou Vang, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of sexual assault and sodomy of a girl under age 13 and procuring a child for prostitution with a deportation order since 2006.
Chong Vue, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of the strong-arm rape of a 12-year-old girl and kidnapping a child with intent to sexually assault her, with a deportation order since 2004,
Ge Yang, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of strong-arm rape, aggravated assault with a weapon, and strangulation with a deportation order since 2012.
Pao Choua Xiong, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of rape and child fondling with a deportation order since 2003.
Kou Lor, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of rape, rape with a weapon, and sexual assault with a deportation order since 1996.
Hernan Cortes-Valencia, Mexican illegal alien convicted of sexual assault of a child and DUI with a deportation order since 2016.
Abdirashid Adosh Elmi, a Somalian illegal alien convicted of homicide.
Gilberto Salguero Landaverde, a Salvadoran illegal alien convicted of three counts of homicide with a deportation order since June 2025.
Gabriel Figueroa Gama, a Mexican illegal convicted of homicide who has been previously deported in 2002.
Galuak Michael Rotgai, a Sudanese illegal alien convicted of homicide.
Thai Lor, a Laotian illegal alien convicted of two counts of homicide with a deportation order since 2009.
Mariana Sia Kanu, an illegal alien from Sierra Leone convicted of two counts of homicide with a deportation order since 2022.
Aldrin Guerrero Munoz, a Mexican illegal alien convicted of homicide with a deportation order since 2015.
Abdirashid Mohamed Ahmed, a Somalian illegal alien convicted of manslaughter with a deportation order since 2022.
Mongong Dual Maniang Deng, a Sudanese illegal alien convicted of attempt to commit homicide, weapon possession, and DUI.
Aler Gomez Lucas, a Guatemalan illegal alien convicted of negligent homicide with a vehicle and DUI with a deportation order since 2022.
Shwe Htoo, a Burmese illegal alien convicted of negligent homicide.
ICE says all of these criminal aliens were roaming freely in the sanctuary state of Minnesota prior to arrest, and that these are the type of people that politicians and activists are referring to as their “neighbors” as they attempt to interfere with ICE.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
3 |
1,107 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-11-2026, 11:25 AM
This post was last modified: 01-11-2026, 12:06 PM by KrustyKrab. 
(01-11-2026, 01:15 AM)chr0naut Wrote: So, you were told that the officer fired in self defence and that is then how you interpret what you see.
Yet the woman had already supposedly swerved towards the officer and the shots were after that.
There was no way the shots could protect the officer from something that had already happened (and that was totally unlikely to recur). The officer was not defending himself, the shots were either fired vengefully, or by accident.
Re-watch the videos and you will clearly see the sequence of events do not support what you thought you saw, because you were trying to interpret it on the basis of a false narrative.
Even if the officer had fired before being allegedly struck, it would not have stopped the momentum of the car, so it couldn't have been self-defensive. In that case, the shots would also have been contributory to the alleged collision with the officer, preventing the woman from both braking and from steering away.
To think that officers have a 'right' to kill someone in an official capacity, is clearly a misunderstanding of the intention and purpose of the law. If you have killed someone, you have become a killer - and there should be severe consequence for that because the act cannot be undone or adequately compensated - it is justice to convict a proven killer, even if it was manslaughter and not murder.
No, I didn’t think a certain way because I was told, that’s what you do.
The video fully supports what I said. He fired as she was going forward at him. If you look at the video you can see when the glass is impacted.
There was nothing “alleged” about her hitting him, she hit him ffs.
Did you even watch the video? It’s clear as day what happened. .
I’m not going to argue with you about this, I’m not going to debate ignorance. You’ve got your mind made up that she’s innocent and didn’t hit him. You’re trying to rewrite what actually happened, probably because you’re programmed to think a certain way. Twist it how you want kiwi, it’s obvious we’re watching two different vids.
3 |
1,107 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-11-2026, 01:15 AM)chr0naut Wrote: So, you were told that the officer fired in self defence and that is then how you interpret what you see.
Yet the woman had already supposedly swerved towards the officer and the shots were after that.
There was no way the shots could protect the officer from something that had already happened (and that was totally unlikely to recur). The officer was not defending himself, the shots were either fired vengefully, or by accident.
Re-watch the videos and you will clearly see the sequence of events do not support what you thought you saw, because you were trying to interpret it on the basis of a false narrative.
Even if the officer had fired before being allegedly struck, it would not have stopped the momentum of the car, so it couldn't have been self-defensive. In that case, the shots would also have been contributory to the alleged collision with the officer, preventing the woman from both braking and from steering away.
To think that officers have a 'right' to kill someone in an official capacity, is clearly a misunderstanding of the intention and purpose of the law. If you have killed someone, you have become a killer - and there should be severe consequence for that because the act cannot be undone or adequately compensated - it is justice to convict a proven killer, even if it was manslaughter and not murder.
He had not only the right to neutralize the threat, it was his duty to protect himself and others from harm. She royally F’d up and paid her life for it. Moral of the story…don’t try and run over a LEO doing his job. Pretty elementary Watson.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

This is what happens when you don’t shoot the driver.
The woman who ran down this cop got 2 years in prison. Her car was at a dead stop before accelerating just a few feet and hit the officer at nearly the exact angle that Renee Nicole Good attempted to strike the Ice officer in Minneapolis.
This could have easily caused a broken neck or death.
Video here…
https://x.com/RealDonKeith/status/2009692562454405414
I wonder if the defenders of Good will defend this driver too.
|