New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[Vermilion]

There are reports that she was told to move the vehicle by other officers, and told also to get out the vehicle by the officer who shot her.

Link

She positioned her car in the middle of a lane of travel sideways, and just sitting there grinning at the officer's approached.
Her “wife” is outside the car videotaping her as she does it.
Then the “wife” gets in the car and tells her to “drive baby drive”.
The “wife” needs to be rung up on charges.
She’s lucky she isn’t dead too.

And all the damage done just to virtue signal on a TikTok video.
The “wife” is trying to claim the gofundme money too.
Good luck with that.
I’m going to be angry if she doesn’t get indicted.

[Oldcarpy2]

So, why did they not just ask her to move her vehicle?

[KrustyKrab]

But it didn't.

But it did.  It’s on video.  BTW…You have to open your eyes to see the video.

 I must say in rereading some of this thread this morning, I’ve realized how ignorant, stupid and daft some of the people commenting actually are.   Some of you are literally arguing against video proof that anyone with more than a brain cell can see.   If it wasn’t so pathetic it’d be funny.   Thx for further reminding me I’m surrounded by complete idiots in this world even on a site called Deny Ignorance, where denial roams free on everything but ignorance.  Ughh

[Kurokage]

Added when agents had the car surrounded?

The video of this thread shows Good’s wife was the one telling her to drive off .  Is it false Goods wife is the one that told her to drive off.

I see you ignore the link and comments from the neighbour.

[WallFlowerActive]

Just shooting a mother of 3 repeatedly for "not following lawful orders" and trying to get away.

Good choose to use her car as a roadblock to go toe to toe with agents impeding and interfering with their duties. The situation escalated when Good would not follow lawful orders.  The situation escalated when she accelerated into the agents resulting in the agents being obligated to protect themselves.

Not rocket science.

[Vermilion]

Who shot a woman in the face for trying to get away from him.

Sounds pretty depraved to me. 

As to protecting himself, why did he repeatedly shoot if merely for protection? 

Thats sustained fire.

Spin it any way you please, again, he will have to live with his actions, and if he believes in God, face his judgment at some point.

Where again i dont think shooting a woman in the face will score him many points.

She was shot for hitting a cop with her vehicle.

[WallFlowerActive]

I see you ignore the link and comments from the neighbour.

Witnesses are found again and again to be inaccurate.

The opening post literally has video of the actual incident.

Sorry.  That is fact.

[Kurokage]

Witnesses are found again and again to be inaccurate.

The opening post literally has video of the actual incident.

Sorry.  That is fact.

That's why witnesses are used in courts to prove guilt!!

Sorry, thats fact....

“I saw the car parked in the road and then a bunch of ICE agents walking up, screaming at her to move, and then when she backed up and then started to turn away to move and to get out of their way, then one of jumped in front of the car, another guy tried to rip the door open and then someone yelled stop and then I heard gunshots,” local resident CJ Janeksela told the broadcaster.

[andy06shake]

She was shot for hitting a cop with her vehicle.

From a foot away....

What was it going to do, stub his toe or sprain his wrist? 

But no, cant simply move out the way.

That big strong specimen of a man resorted to a spray of bullets.

Well done, how very ""lawfull"" and convenient.

[WallFlowerActive]

That's why witnesses are used in courts to prove guilt!!

Sorry, thats fact....

No.  Video evidence trumps witnesses because they are known to be accurate.
The opening post of this video is the incident.

In the video Good’s wife is the one that told her to drive off.  Is that false.