0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 07:44 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Ive seen the videos, i don't agree.
And i doubt we will agree as to what they show.
Again busy on my end.
Your laws will determine the man's fate, not our opinions.
Here’s a photo of her suv with a bullethole in the windshield.
Hope this helps!
https://x.com/RogerGrant1952/status/2009232498862289300
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

I'm a touch disappointed that this is now being amplified as 'activism' related... You see, once the FBI are involved it ALL becomes about "political optics,... truth be damned."
This was a stupid escalation of someone virtue signaling for their cause... and someone who decided they would take action against them... that's all.
The court will now hear the FBI wish-list of charges, after 'confidential lawyer-to-lawyer' dialogue ensues.
I just can't feel OK with someone dying in this kind of encounter... it seems counterintuitive as an outcome.
Who is willing to give their life to be a pain-in-the-ass to government officials?
And who is willing to kill to make one of them "compliant?"
Probably no one... so this was a tragedy of human nature... 'everybody's' attitude was pertinent...
Don't worry though... the FBI will investigate... right?
But doesn't ICE have it's own prosecutors? Does the local jurisdiction not cover any of this? Or is it all superseded because it was an ICE (federal operation?)
9 |
2,087 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 07:46 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: FAFO
I know the evil communist leftists will never apologize for what they've said over the past two days.
They've never apologized for anything they've ever been wrong about....which is everything.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 07:45 PM)chr0naut Wrote: But she did NOT actually run over the officer. That is clear from all the videos.
To have actually run over the officer, her wheels would have had to go over a part of the officers body. That was not shown in the videos.
In Good's shooting, while it is plausible that the car struck the officer, it didn't stop the officer from aiming and shooting.
Nor was there sufficient time for the officer to determine if the driver actually intended to impact the officer.
There have been allegations that one officer told her to move the car out of the way, and another was telling her to stop.
There was snow on the ground and an incline of the road under the car's wheels, leading to questions of traction. The wheels may have been turned away from the officer, but the car may have slipped straight forwards, rather than turning away from the driver.
The front wheels were definitely angled away from the officer in her path, both prior to, and after the shooting. It is unlikely that the driver turned the steering wheel appreciably after being fatally shot. This is underlined by the path of the car followed after the shooting.
The camera bouncing up to point at the face of the officer could have coincided with the recoil from the shot, rather than from them being struck by the car. I can't see the officer standing in a properly braced position.
She was just trying to flee. She was turning her tires.
Okay, she did try to run him over, but she didn’t touch him.
She did touch him, but she wasn’t seriously trying to hurt him.
Ok she tried killing him, but why didn’t they just shoot her tires?
The evolution of the excuses is nauseating.
6 |
1,580 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 04:30 PM)KrustyKrab Wrote: She ran him up then, pick your poison. It literally lifted him off the ground. Either way could’ve had fatal consequences for the officer.
But it didn't.
51 |
4,104 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 07:57 PM)Vermilion Wrote: She was just trying to flee. She was turning her tires.
Okay, she did try to run him over, but she didn’t touch him.
She did touch him, but she wasn’t seriously trying to hurt him.
Ok she tried killing him, but why didn’t they just shoot her tires?
The evolution of the excuses is nauseating.
They're trying to make her the next drug dealer Floyd-whatever.
Just a reason to riot.
And so people can get free tv's and cell phones and leftists will say, "They are voicing their opinion"
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 08:03 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: They're trying to make her the next drug dealer Floyd-whatever.
Just a reason to riot.
And so people can get free tv's and cell phones and leftists will say, "They are voicing their opinion"
And they really think nobody can clearly see what they’re up to.
It’s wild.
Mayor Jacob Frey crying at George Floyd’s casket will never not be one of the most pathetic things to happen in Minnesota history
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2009672291467280814
6 |
1,580 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 04:44 PM)sahgwa Wrote: Thank the Gods I am not in the British justice system.
The officer fired in self defence to get her to not ram him.
Imagine your scenario, where he shouldn't have shot, didn't, and then he dies later in hospital from his injuries, and she gets off scott free from some activist judge for his death?
The officer stood in front of a car that was blocking the path of other ICE vehicles.
Did he imagine that he could Superman cars to a stop if their driver decided to make a run from a stop?
Was the officer trained to do this?
51 |
4,104 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 08:10 PM)chr0naut Wrote: The officer stood in front of a car that was blocking the path of other ICE vehicles.
Did he imagine that he could Superman cars to a stop if their driver decided to make a run from a stop?
Was the officer trained to do this?
Only criminals would run into police and federal agents.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
6 |
1,580 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(01-09-2026, 04:54 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: That is true.
Trying to run someone over with a car is turning the car into a weapon.
It's on the lawbooks here.
Intentionally standing in a roadway with intention to obstruct traffic without Hi-Vis aids to direct traffic is also illegal.
|