Mir Encounter 1995

[DanZarfati]

From the times of Martyn Stubbs and Luna Cognita. This encounter was barely evaluated.[font][font]15 November 1995[/font][/font]
Mission: STS-71
Atlantis (OV-104) docked with Mir during this historic mission, the first docking between a U.S. Space Shuttle and the Russian station.
This footage was captured by the legend Martyn Stubbs, it made part of his video “The Smoking Gun”, as far as I remembered it was only analysed by David Sereda long time ago. No one barely talks about it. However the anomalies are very present and easy to spot.
Again I captured some batches of frame sequence and load on the model to evaluate, no non-exotic explanation was forthcoming.

 

 
According to the model the estimated distance from Atlantis to Mir is 285 meters. It believes most of the objects that cross our field of view is more than 1 meter long.
The characteristics of the objects do not conform to what we could encounter.
Not Ice particles
Ice particles or insulation flakes typically tumble, flicker, and change brightness due to their irregular surfaces catching sunlight at different angles.
These objects remain uniform in intensity, with no rotation or irregular movement across frames.
Not Jet ice particles.
RCS firings produce visible plumes, cones, or puffs — none of which are seen.
Additionally, such particles would radiate from a known point (e.g., the Shuttle body), but these objects appear already in motion.
[b]Not [/b][b]Nearby Debris or Dust Close to the Camera[/b]
If close, these particles would show rapid parallax effects as the camera or Mir moves — meaning their apparent motion would be non-linear or erratic.
Instead, these objects retain stable motion, size, and trajectory, showing none of the visual distortion expected of close-up objects.
Not Outgassing Events
Outgassing creates diffuse clouds or drifting semi-transparent plumes, not clearly bounded, persistent lights.
The objects here are compact, bounded, and visibly modular, suggesting structured form, not gaseous dispersion.
Not Micrometeoroids
Micrometeoroids move extremely fast, often invisible or showing only streaks if caught at all.
These objects move slowly and steadily across frames, clearly visible and trackable.Not Lens Flares or Internal Camera Reflections
Lens flares mirror the position of the sun and respond to camera angle shifts.
Here, the objects move independently of camera motion, maintain consistent shape and brightness, and do not correlate with any strong light source.
 
Now, there are a few things to reflect upon. What we see are deliberate defiance from the other intelligence. The objects have a very consistent behaviour within this scene, and among other encounters with NASA assets.
They usually fly by but keep their shape undefined, they also avoid making curves, but not always, they keep ambiguity to a high level, provoking without disclosing.

[Darkorange]

thanks for this post. Obviously no one back then, not even now would acknowledge ufo. But...we know, it was lockheed secret tech! Because one senator said so. (kidding)...and lots of folks here on DI support this.

i say, orbit is the best place to watch alien activity. there are so much more incidents occurring during space flights. ISS live feeds could be one of the best observation points ever if one has time to watch.
i have seen a triangle over the ocean...i mean, three lights, objects forming a triangle. that episode was shown on BBC few days later. on another occasion while doing chores in a house watching ISS i saw a dot of light coming from over the horizon approaching ISS. Ruby in color growing in size on approach. the feed was cut off when the object was getting close. no lens flare or anything.

cheers)

[Kwaka]

Some cool shots there I had not seen before. 

So what is going on if space does have some kind of biology/life form that is still unknown. Is the Secret Space Program that good in keeping it all covered up as they work it out? Does the SSP go all battleship troopers and there in now nothing left to see?

With some of the things Bruce Sees all got out, somethings are still going on at he Moon. Things like this video does make one wonder just how deep and resilient life is.

[DanZarfati]

Some cool shots there I had not seen before. 

So what is going on if space does have some kind of biology/life form that is still unknown. Is the Secret Space Program that good in keeping it all covered up as they work it out? Does the SSP go all battleship troopers and there in now nothing left to see?

With some of the things Bruce Sees all got out, somethings are still going on at he Moon. Things like this video does make one wonder just how deep and resilient life is.

Man, the attitude is so dismissive, it was always in front of us. Always. We had at ATS, that gentleman, who always went ape shit, he is so famous, I forgot his name, he always went man when we post some of this. lol.

[DanZarfati]

thanks for this post. Obviously no one back then, not even now would acknowledge ufo. But...we know, it was lockheed secret tech! Because one senator said so. (kidding)...and lots of folks here on DI support this.

i say, orbit is the best place to watch alien activity. there are so much more incidents occurring during space flights. ISS live feeds could be one of the best observation points ever if one has time to watch.
i have seen a triangle over the ocean...i mean, three lights, objects forming a triangle. that episode was shown on BBC few days later. on another occasion while doing chores in a house watching ISS i saw a dot of light coming from over the horizon approaching ISS. Ruby in color growing in size on approach. the feed was cut off when the object was getting close. no lens flare or anything.

cheers)

Man, that is the complement of my post. 
I did it later, I was still thinking. it goes like this:

"[font]To accept this [/font][font]is[/font][font] to accept that we are being watched [/font][font]intimately[/font][font], as in calibration. These objects pass through our systems. They seem to know exactly where our cameras are mounted, what their resolution thresholds are, which angles obscure and which reveal. They know where we’re pointing not just our optics, but our [/font][font]attention, [/font][font]they know what trigger us and what not.[/font][font]This isn’t passive observation, it’s interactive theater. The choreography suggests not only spatial awareness but a grasp of our psychological framing. They don't avoid detection; they [/font][font]modulate it[/font][font]. Appear just enough to raise questions, never enough to settle them. [/font]
[font]The[/font][font]s[/font][font]e [/font][font]are [/font][font]psychological operations calibrated to our sensory and cognitive limitations. They’re [/font][font]anticipating[/font][font] us [/font][font]in every respect, that is why the implications are so disturbing, and the phenomenon is presented in a very mediated, sanitised manner.[/font]"