May 2025 UFO Hearings

[pianopraze]

UPDATE: May 7 Twitter

Just asked @realannapaulina and she confirmed next week’s UAP hearing is still on in the US House. Stay tuned to http://askapoluaps.com for full post and further updates!

[quintessentone]

UPDATE: May 7 Twitter

I've subscribed to this thread. Who knows? Maybe this time they may make some headway.

[pianopraze]

I've subscribed to this thread. Who knows? Maybe this time they may make some headway.

Feels like Charlie Brown trying to kick the disclosure football…


I rarely expect anything goof, surprised when something happens.

[quintessentone]

Feels like Charlie Brown trying to kick the disclosure football…


I rarely expect anything goof, surprised when something happens.

Wasn't that because Lucy was holding it and at the last second pulled it away? They need to remove Lucy from the equation and replace the ball holder with someone that can be trusted.

[pianopraze]

UPDATE: Twitter
 

Rep. Eric Burlison attended TWO classified meetings today: one with AARO and one with the FBI. What he learned raises serious questions about the entire UAP coverup. Here's what Rep. Eric Burlison told Matt Laslo from Askapol about the events of the day:

MORNING — AARO Briefing: Burlison came armed with questions from whistleblower David Grusch. He found out something explosive: The White House oversees Special Access Programs (SAPs) that do NOT report to Congress. That’s a direct breach of oversight. AARO admitted they have no UAP craft. No bodies. No hard evidence. Despite the hearings, testimony, and reports—they’re still flying blind.

AFTERNOON — FBI Briefing: This meeting was classified and far more revealing. The FBI has a covert UAP working group:
• Led by a national program manager
• With over a dozen personnel across the U.S.

What they showed members of Congress was surprising: Videos not shown by AARO. Never-before-seen footage of UAPs from FBI sources. Rep. Burlison commented: “The FBI is more professional and better resourced to investigate this.”

But here’s the twist... The FBI asked a bold question in the meeting: Can Congress give us more direct authority for UAP investigations? This is because AARO has a budget and the FBI does not to look into this topic. Which is why their UAP Working Group only has slightly over a dozen agents that are investigating this across all 50 states. They need Congress to give them a budget and direct authority to investigate UAP. Despite better data, the FBI also admitted: They too have NO hard evidence of craft or bodies. So what does this mean? It means the deepest truths—if they exist—are outside the reach of both AARO and the FBI. They’re buried in SAPs that may be run directly from the Executive Branch. If that’s true... Then the entire UAP coverup ends at the White House. And Disclosure to Congress or the public? It may never happen unless laws change. The wall of secrecy is real. Congress is being strategically blocked. The public is being strategically misled.

[imitator]

UPDATE:

here is lue’s response: Lue’s Twitter

I think Elizondo is telling the truth... if he was truly a CIA operative, they wouldn't use a photo of irrigation circles. It's unlikely they would present something so easily debunked... especially in a public setting. It sounds like he was trusting a source...  I would lean to his source as being the operative, trying to discredit Elizondo.

Elizondo has acknowledged working alongside the CIA, as many in defense and intelligence roles do, that's just part of the territory. Not something to brag about if your operative LOL... but who knows, right?

[pianopraze]

Wasn't that because Lucy was holding it and at the last second pulled it away? They need to remove Lucy from the equation and replace the ball holder with someone that can be trusted.

looks like that is some agency at the Whitehousewith or without presidential knowledge.
 

I think Elizondo is telling the truth... if he was truly a CIA operative, they wouldn't use a photo of irrigation circles. It's unlikely they would present something so easily debunked... especially in a public setting. It sounds like he was trusting a source...  I would lean to his source as being the operative, trying to discredit Elizondo.

Elizondo has acknowledged working alongside the CIA, as many in defense and intelligence roles do, that's just part of the territory. Not something to brag about if you’re operative LOL... but who knows, right?

"I am an intelligence agent who has worked for many years creating false narratives "

"I am totally telling the truth now…"


The cognitive dissonance is loud.

I Vary on the day and subject if I believe him.

[quintessentone]

looks like that is some agency at the Whitehousewith or without presidential knowledge.
 

"I am an intelligence agent who has worked for many years creating false narratives "

"I am totally telling the truth now…"


The cognitive dissonance is loud.

I Vary on the day and subject if I believe him.

What do they say about people who deceive?

"A liar will not be believed, even when he speaks the truth." - BrainyQuote"

"By a lie, a man… annihilates his dignity as a man." - Immanuel Kant"

"One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived." - BrainyQuote"

[pianopraze]

What do they say about people who deceive?

"A liar will not be believed, even when he speaks the truth." - BrainyQuote"

"By a lie, a man… annihilates his dignity as a man." - Immanuel Kant"

"One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived." - BrainyQuote"

At I baseline I disbelieve everything about UFOs other than people are seeing and experiencing things.

not to judge.

I was recently in a car wreck, totally not my fault person turned last moment siting at yellow turn lane across my lane while I had green light. Both insurances ruled they were at fault and I didn’t even have to pay my deductible. Regardless when trying to recall the details I could not in my mind recall all the details after the accident. Even if I actually hit them.

things happen so fast and last so briefly brain can’t put things together. So I believe people see things. The recall I think is always flawed.

video is better but so easy to fake now.

therefore all ufo related material, to me, has to be viewed on a sliding scale, with each new bit of info sliding what I believe. Take that ufo ball, I think it’s fake, but if new info comes to light I’m willing to slide the scale more towards belief. But nothing has so far.

[quintessentone]

At I baseline I disbelieve everything about UFOs other than people are seeing and experiencing things.

not to judge.

I was recently in a car wreck, totally not my fault person turned last moment siting at yellow turn lane across my lane while I had green light. Both insurances ruled they were at fault and I didn’t even have to pay my deductible. Regardless when trying to recall the details I could not in my mind recall all the details after the accident. Even if I actually hit them.

things happen so fast and last so briefly brain can’t put things together. So I believe people see things. The recall I think is always flawed.

video is better but so easy to fake now.

therefore all ufo related material, to me, has to be viewed on a sliding scale, with each new bit of info sliding what I believe. Take that ufo ball, I think it’s fake, but if new info comes to light I’m willing to slide the scale more towards belief. But nothing has so far.

Are you okay from that car wreck? I know how accident aftermaths show up days later with strains, pains, and post shock (sometimes).

I am with you on all you said, especially how videos can be manipulated or created by various means, especially AI nowadays, but my recall of my contactee experience is not flawed, for some strange reason, it is always the same, consistent recall (in detail).