James Comey Indicited

[WallFlowerActive]

Only in your fantasy world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_betw..._officials


If everything was perfectly above board, why were key people close to Trump obstructing the investigation and lying?

Educate yourself, if you care to.

Still has nothing to se with Trump Russia Collusion was a lie based off Hilary Clinton buying Russian misinformation to smear Trump.

is that really such a hard concept to grasp?

[Thoughtful3]

Comey a commie? Wtf are you talking about? Pretty sure he was a registered republican for most of his life. He's anti-Trump, sure, but that's just because he's not an idiot.

Are you sure about that? Being a Republican? He must have forgotten this.


https://x.com/Comey/status/1323637174911250438

[Thoughtful3]

Wise words to remember….


Small lies matter, even about yearbooks.

From the standard jury instruction:
“If a witness is shown knowingly to have testified falsely about any material matter, you have a right to distrust such witness' other testimony and you may reject all the testimony of that witness ...”

That is exactly the issue with his book. If he lies about what he did pre Obama what else has he lied about. I've read through his book and now I am  . Comey facts or Comey fiction?

He also has some weird lines on specific pages. Since he's FBI this must mean something.
Page 7
Page 37 a line on the bottom, and the same for pages
Page 47...giving us [17] 


Page 101...Covid was launched 101 years after the Spanish flu of 1918-1919.

I've been tracking these lines through a number of key books. Comey re-opened Hillary's email issue October 28 which just happens to be Billy the Gates birthday. His new book "Source Code" also has weird lines on the top and bottom of specific pages.

[Thoughtful3]

It's very disturbing when Comey names Chapter 5- "The Easy Lie" Page 50.

Page 51 "Everyone lies at some point in their life. The important questions are where, about what, and how often?" Lines 22 & 23.

Page 52- "They surround themselves with other liars. The circle becomes closer and smaller, with those unwilling to surrender their moral compasses pushed out and those willing to to tolerate deceit brought closer to the center of power.
Perks and access are given  to those willing to lie and tolerate lies. This creates a culture, which becomes an entire way of life. The easy casual lies- those are a very dangerous thing. They open up the path to the bigger lies, in more important places, where the consequences aren't so harmless."

Page 52 is significant. Billy the Gates in his climate manual states that the only number we need to know is #52.
52<> 25.

[Ignorant]

Are you sure about that? Being a Republican? He must have forgotten this.

https://x.com/Comey/status/1323637174911250438

I said for most of his life. He switched because of Trump, as any intelligent republican would have done.

[Ignorant]

Still has nothing to se with Trump Russia Collusion was a lie based off Hilary Clinton buying Russian misinformation to smear Trump.

is that really such a hard concept to grasp?

Why do you think it has nothing to do with that? I'm saying it's probably not a lie, and supporting that by pointing out that the investigation led to multiple convictions including of people close to Trump, who were shown to have lied and obstructed the investigation. We can't be sure whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, but considering the lengths it went to to obstruct Mueller's investigation, it seems rather likely. As I said, if everything was perfectly above board, why was the Trump campaign lying and obstructing? Innocent people would have been happy to cooperate and clear their name.

If Trump himself hadn't been in office at the time, he might've faced charges, despite people around him falling on the sword for him. Mueller didn't pursue him, citing legal guidelines and standards preventing prosecution of a sitting president.
 

.... based off Hilary Clinton buying Russian misinformation to smear Trump.

And just to address this non sense: You're talking about the Steele dossier, which was the result of opposition research by the Clinton campaign. Opposition research is standard, every single politician does it every election. It's a way to find your opponent's weaknesses, which is obviously important for strategizing.

During this research it was found that Russia was working to interfere with the election in Trump's favor. This is not invalidated by the fact that it was opposition research. It certainly isn't "Russian misinformation". It's established fact that Russia interfered with the 2016 election in Trump's favor. I understand that this is not the case in your fantasy world, but that's a you problem.

[WallFlowerActive]

Why do you think it has nothing to do with that?

The investigation into Trump Russian Collusion was from the Clinton Campaign through a law firm buying Russian misinformation from if I remember correctly through a former UK intel asset.  The Steel Dossier than at some point was leaked or give to the FBI and the media.  There was some shady action between the intel community and the media to basically lie to the FISA court to act like the Steal smear was from different sources.  Where it all stemmed from the Hilary campaign.  Where the FISA warrants to start an unprecedented spying operation on an opposing presidential candidate by the party holding office where created under lies.  

So you are comfortable with the presidential candidate of the party in power through foreign agents buying Russian misinform then manipulating the intel community and media to obtain FISA warrants under false pretext to initiate spying and interfering with the out of power presidential candidate.

[WallFlowerActive]

 Opposition research is standard, 

Buying slander from a foreign assets telling you what you want to hear for money with zero credibility isn’t research.


added..

Newly Declassified Document Indicates FBI Misled Congress on Reliability of Steele Dossier
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/r...le-dossier
“What does this mean? That Congress as well as the FISA Court was lied to about the reliability of the Russian sub-source. I will be asking FBI Director Wray to provide me all the details possible about how the briefing was arranged and who provided it.
“Inspector General Horowitz’s team found this briefing document. Inspector General Horowitz and his team deserve great credit for uncovering systematic fraud at Department of Justice surrounding the Carter Page FISA warrant. I’m also very appreciative of the Department of Justice’s release of the FBI document used to brief the Senate Intelligence Committee.”

Tulsi Gabbard strips 37 security clearances over Obama-ordered intel report that launched Russiagate

https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/us-news/tu...ussiagate/

WASHINGTON — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced security clearances had been pulled from 37 current and former officials who “abused public trust by politicizing and manipulating” information — including several who were involved in a controversial, President Barack Obama-ordered assessment of Russian influence in the 2016 election.

[Ignorant]

The investigation into Trump Russian Collusion was from the Clinton Campaign through a law firm buying Russian misinformation from if I remember correctly through a former UK intel asset.  The Steel Dossier than at some point was leaked or give to the FBI and the media.  There was some shady action between the intel community and the media to basically lie to the FISA court to act like the Steal smear was from different sources.  Where it all stemmed from the Hilary campaign.  Where the FISA warrants to start an unprecedented spying operation on an opposing presidential candidate by the party holding office where created under lies.  

So you are comfortable with the presidential candidate of the party in power through foreign agents buying Russian misinform then manipulating the intel community and media to obtain FISA warrants under false pretext to initiate spying and interfering with the out of power presidential candidate.

No, but your characterization is wrong. It was not Russian misinformation. It's established fact that Russia interfered with the 2016 US election in favor of Trump. And there was, whether you like it or not, good reason to believe there was collusion between Russia and his campaign. And since this would be a very serious problem if true, it was investigated. That's supposed to happen in a country of laws.

If you want to believe the investigation was started under false pretenses, I'm not going to argue the point. You seem to just be paraphrasing the Nunes memo which has been debunked but I'm not interested in exploring it, because neither of us is going to get anything out of it. I will say this: Even if the investigation was started under false pretenses (which it wasn't), it led to multiple convictions. So it was ultimately a good thing these people were investigated. They broke the law after all.

[WallFlowerActive]

No, but your characterization is wrong. 

Not what my sources claim concerning the Steel dossier and some of the original FISA warrants to kick off Trump Russia Collusion.  


The Steel Dossier was paid for foreign lies and propaganda with no credibility.

Basically Obama as president and Hillary used the intel community to “swat” Trump as the opposition presidential candidate.  And there was those in the intel community more than happy to help.  
 

Swatting is a type of harassment that involves trying to trick police into sending a heavily armed raid to someone’s home — often a SWAT team 

https://time.com/6551369/swatting-hoax-m...ary-state/

The democrats are as corrupt as they come, and any attempt to defend them is sad and stupid.  Like the people that have embraced swatting Republicans.  I see the pattern.  You don’t?