James Comey Indicited

[Ignorant]

I already gave the links showing that the leak happened for sure.
There is no question about it.  Acknowledged by both right and left.
Either Comey or McCabe leaked it and lied about it.  Both are slime.
McCabe says it was Comey who was top dog.   
Comey doesn't say McCabe did it.
This leak was about Hillary and the election.   It was massive.
Common sense says that some minion wouldn't have done it without
prior approval from the top dog.  It's too big for a minion to make the call.

I meant specifically that last bit. "It's too big for a minion to make the call" is self-evident to you. Why?

An IG report already concluded that McCabe made misleading and false statements about this. So why are you sure he isn't lying?

[Vermilion]

The problem I have here is "Rules For Thee, But Not For Me".  If the FBI (or any 3-letter agency) lie to us, it is legal for them.  But if any of us lie to them (even by accident), we get about 5 years in the klink.  But what he is charged with is far higher than that.  Not a chance he will be convicted.  Trial in Eastern Virginia (reportedly about 85% liberals, and I heard an Obama appointed judge.  The jury pool will almost certainly be heavily liberal I think.  Not a chance of conviction in those courts in my opinion.  Oh well...minions like all of us do not get that advantage that is given to higher powers.

I agree.
It’s worth the slim chance he gets what he deserves in the pursuit of justice.
He’s dirty as it gets and we need to hold these fools accountable in every instance.

[WallFlowerActive]

Multiple people were convicted in that case, including people very close to Trump. Remember Paul Manafort?

Really.  What-about-ism?
 
Which has nothing to do with Trump Russia Collusion was a lie.

[Ignorant]

Really.  What-about-ism?
 
Which has nothing to do with Trump Russia Collusion was a lie.

Wdym? Manafort was a central player in that case.

[WallFlowerActive]

Wdym? Manafort was a central player in that case.

Ok. The Trump Russia Collusion was a fabricated lie.  It was based of the Clinton purchased misinformation from Russia.  There is more evidence of Clinton Russia Collusion to smear Trump than Trump Russia Collusion. Isn’t that ironic.

[Ignorant]

Ok. The Trump Russia Collusion was a fabricated lie.  It was based of the Clinton purchased misinformation from Russia.  There is more evidence of Clinton Russia Collusion to smear Trump than Trump Russia Collusion. Isn’t that ironic.

Only in your fantasy world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_betw..._officials

Following intelligence reports about the Russian interference, Trump and some of his campaign members, business partners, administration nominees, and family members were subjected to intense scrutiny to determine whether they had improper dealings during their contacts with Russian officials.[3][4] Several people connected to the Trump campaign made false statements about those links and obstructed investigations.[2] These investigations resulted in many criminal charges and indictments.

If everything was perfectly above board, why were key people close to Trump obstructing the investigation and lying?

Educate yourself, if you care to.

[ElitePlebeian]

Ow yea wikipedia as source. Very credible if you want to leave out any context that might counter leftist propaganda. And thats not me thats the owner of Wikipedia saying that;

https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-...blishment/

[UltraBudgie]

Ow yea wikipedia as source. Very credible if you want to leave out any context that might counter leftist propaganda. And thats not me thats the owner of Wikipedia saying that;

https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-...blishment/

Very true! Wikipedia is definitely one of the digital "battlespaces":



"We must, you must take this deadly seriously. Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing north of the Latani River. Capturing Tik Tok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermmon. Libelist tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen, but this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline."

Obviously, not just Israel, but they know the game.

[Ignorant]

Ow yea wikipedia as source. Very credible if you want to leave out any context that might counter leftist propaganda. And thats not me thats the owner of Wikipedia saying that;

https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-...blishment/

These are facts that are not disputed, except by people who live in a fantasy world, like you.

You'll believe what you want to believe. The sources are below the page for you to explore, if you feel so inclined.

[quintessentone]

Only in your fantasy world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_betw..._officials


If everything was perfectly above board, why were key people close to Trump obstructing the investigation and lying?

Educate yourself, if you care to.

The thing with Wikipedia is, what you said, to use it as a jumping off point to other sources or to the specific truth/lie in question, to...you guessed it, do your own research by going to the sources provided there. That applies to all news articles as well when they provide the original sources, or mentioned where the facts came from in the first place. Keep up the good work and being a good faith player here.