01-15-2026, 04:54 PM
❮
❯
|
01-15-2026, 05:04 PM
(01-15-2026, 04:54 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: The Insurrection Act is being considered because Walz is saying he is going to pit American law enforcement from Minnesota against law abiding Federal American Law enforcement. That's insurrection. Quote from Bullitt: "Frank, you're living in a sewer"
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
01-15-2026, 05:21 PM
(01-15-2026, 05:05 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: I don't know what Bullitt is, A classic film with Steve McQueen with an awesome car chase.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
01-15-2026, 06:39 PM
(01-15-2026, 03:48 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: I still say you are getting carried away. The Insurrection Act against those breaking the law and fighting against federal law enforcement is just fine. And against Walz who wants to use the National Guard against federal law enforcement ... pitting American law enforcement against American law enforcement. Nothing like Iran and the protesters. I applaud it and hope that Trump engages the Insurrection Act sooner rather than later. As we have seen, it is easy for the administration to imply all sorts of crimes against people 'in the moment' and without valid consideration of the facts. After the invocation of the Insurrection Act, which does NOT allow judicial verification of any criminal allegation, do you apologise to the innocent corpses? Because military 'enforcement' are enabled to put down an 'insurrection' (which as January 6 shows, means different things to different people) using deadly force! "Oops, sorry, we didn't realize that the arms you had were the type with hands at the end of them. Someone must have goofed" (flies buzz). In the space of a week or so, the USA has already descended into a totalitarian military dictatorship with militarized officers killing people for alleged and poorly evidenced assumed crimes. The citizens of the USA need to stop that kind of thing before it manifests its full results. Also, the 2nd Amendment makes armed civil disobedience legally mandated (what a stupid law!).
Support the Christchurch Call
01-16-2026, 02:21 PM
(01-15-2026, 04:37 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Yeah. Of course it did. And as opposed to questioning the situation or getting information from a source other than the media you just decided to accept it as truth without any hesitation. I thought the motto was "Deny Ignorance". You're really clinging to the stalker thing. It's cute that you think you're that important. If you'd like to disengage in the dialogue, maybe try...I dunno....stop responding?
01-20-2026, 02:05 PM
Well yes when no one can afford to buy anything that generally is going to lower the trade deficit. This is a sign of our economy slowing.
Lowering the trade deficit by increasing exports is a good sign, but if you’re lowering the trade deficit by decreasing imports you’re not really helping the economy. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





