Is Telepathy real?

[annonentity]

The  real experience can't be confused with a created one .take this as a for instance and have a look at the comments. It seems the official story in the west with regards to reincarnating isn't what's really happening on the ground.
   People like the child's father would rather it went away and didn't happen to him. Thats probably what happens in this part of the world where having to accept a different paradigm is unsettling. But he might be trying to ignore reality. Which of course is his choice. 5-Year-Old Says He Is a WOMAN Reborn As a Boy - The Ghost Inside My Child (S1 Flashback) | LMN - YouTube

[andy06shake]

The  real experience can't be confused with a created one .take this as a for instance and have a look at the comments. It seems the official story in the west with regards to reincarnating isn't what's really happening on the ground.
   People like the child's father would rather it went away and didn't happen to him. Thats probably what happens in this part of the world where having to accept a different paradigm is unsettling. But he might be trying to ignore reality. Which of course is his choice. 5-Year-Old Says He Is a WOMAN Reborn As a Boy - The Ghost Inside My Child (S1 Flashback) | LMN - YouTube

What do you want me to say?

It's not real proof of anything other than a strange little boy.

And you appear to be ignoring questions again.

Tell me this, what part of our brain would be responsible for telepathic ability? 

The stories about children recalling past lives or showing signs of telepathy are compelling, because they are children, but personal accounts aren't solid evidence.

A kid's memory is somewhat elastic and shaped by suggestion, even if you don't realize you are doing it.

Again, science has tested telepathy and reincarnation claims for decades, and controlled experiments haven't shown repeatable proof.

Why do you think that is?

It's because believing isn't the same as verifying, and again, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Which hasn't been found for telepathy or reincarnation in any sort of repeatable manner.

[quintessentone]

What do you want me to say?

It's not real proof of anything other than a strange little boy.

And you appear to be ignoring questions again.

The stories about children recalling past lives or showing signs of telepathy are compelling, because they are children, but personal accounts aren't solid evidence.

A kid's memory is somewhat elastic and shaped by suggestion, even if you don't realize you are doing it.

Again, science has tested telepathy and reincarnation claims for decades, and controlled experiments haven't shown repeatable proof.

Why do you think that is?

It's because believing isn't the same as verifying, and again, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Which hasn't been found for telepathy or reincarnation in any sort of repeatable manner.

So it appears it may be chemistry (oxytocin study; dopamine transmission) as to whether a person believes in 'unfounded' beliefs. But telepathy can still be a physical reality as per the study but just not in the way of magic or by metaphysical means. Maybe we need different descriptors for the different ways of achieving the same thing? 

-------------------

"If these findings are indeed unfounded, one group of researchers has demonstrated that people who have such beliefs differ from those who don’t due to genetic differences in dopamine transmission. Greater dopamine availability was found in those people who had a greater propensity for “unfounded” beliefs. This suggests that different chemistry may underlie different belief systems, but it does not necessarily imply pathology."

"Hypotheses: Based on this preliminary research, the following hypotheses would be fair: (1) Our brains are wired to pick up subtle social cues; (2) Our brains are wired to automatically reflect intentions and emotions in the presence of others; (3) For our brains to connect across large distances, we have to be dialed in to a frequency similar to whatever an Internet connection allows; (4) If people have the capacity for telepathy, some people may be more capable than others, and (5) The hippocampal and parahippocampal brain regions may be involved in telepathic communication since they are involved in integrating memories and subtle aspects of language communication (e.g. sarcasm.); (6) ESP could depend on fast inference, which requires more openness to another, as implied by the oxytocin study."

The Biology of Telepathy | Psychology Today

----------------

Edgar Cayce's reading about reincarnation or rather the realms of levels of the soul does not mention regressing to any type of lower animal consciousness. He stressed that some of us are too distracted with our egos and the material world to be able to become aware enough to transcend into higher states of soul consciousness and therefore create a prison for ourselves by remaining on the same level with each reincarnation. He says we are souls in human form, not humans with souls.

--------------------

It may come down to beliefs as an explanation for you, but strong beliefs equate into reality not just for an individual but for large cultures throughout the world. 

But being skeptical is a good thing because that brain wave study on the meditating monk was repeated by the same study team later down the road using more modern instrumentation, and it disproved the first study. That may only indicate that the researchers just haven't hit on the right type of way of measuring or having the instrumentation to measure the mysterious mechanics of telepathy, ESP or remote viewing.

[andy06shake]

So it appears it may be chemistry (oxytocin study; dopamine transmission) as to whether a person believes in 'unfounded' beliefs. But telepathy can still be a physical reality as per the study but just not in the way of magic or by metaphysical means. Maybe we need different descriptors for the different ways of achieving the same thing? 

-------------------

"If these findings are indeed unfounded, one group of researchers has demonstrated that people who have such beliefs differ from those who don’t due to genetic differences in dopamine transmission. Greater dopamine availability was found in those people who had a greater propensity for “unfounded” beliefs. This suggests that different chemistry may underlie different belief systems, but it does not necessarily imply pathology."

"Hypotheses: Based on this preliminary research, the following hypotheses would be fair: (1) Our brains are wired to pick up subtle social cues; (2) Our brains are wired to automatically reflect intentions and emotions in the presence of others; (3) For our brains to connect across large distances, we have to be dialed in to a frequency similar to whatever an Internet connection allows; (4) If people have the capacity for telepathy, some people may be more capable than others, and (5) The hippocampal and parahippocampal brain regions may be involved in telepathic communication since they are involved in integrating memories and subtle aspects of language communication (e.g. sarcasm.); (6) ESP could depend on fast inference, which requires more openness to another, as implied by the oxytocin study."

The Biology of Telepathy | Psychology Today

----------------

Edgar Cayce's reading about reincarnation or rather the realms of levels of the soul does not mention regressing to any type of lower animal consciousness. He stressed that some of us are too distracted with our egos and the material world to be able to become aware enough to transcend into higher states of soul consciousness and therefore create a prison for ourselves by remaining on the same level with each reincarnation. He says we are souls in human form, not humans with souls.

--------------------

It may come down to beliefs as an explanation for you, but strong beliefs equate into reality not just for an individual but for large cultures throughout the world. 

But being skeptical is a good thing because that brain wave study on the meditating monk was repeated by the same study team later down the road using more modern instrumentation, and it disproved the first study. That may only indicate that the researchers just haven't hit on the right type of way of measuring or having the instrumentation to measure the mysterious mechanics of telepathy, ESP or remote viewing.

It's a fascinating subject, but there's still no solid scientific evidence that it exists as a real, physical phenomenon. 

Our brain chemistry may very well influence belief in such ideas, but that doesn't mean the experiences are literal or universal.

The "findings" always lack repetition or rely on highly subjective interpretations.

Our brains are great at spotting patterns, even when none exist, and that's what they do.

Cultural beliefs and strong personal experiences feel real, but they don't equate to actual proof.

Being open-minded is healthy, but so is skepticism, especially when research doesn't hold up. 

Mystery isn't always magic.

As to Edgar Cayce's readings, well, according to him, Atlantis should have turned up by now, and yet....

[UltraBudgie]

Yes yes we get it. Only science is real. Didn't you admit upthread that might not be the case?

Sheesh.

Deny Ignorance: where materialists come to deny that they are ignorant.

[quintessentone]

It's a fascinating subject, but there's still no solid scientific evidence that it exists as a real, physical phenomenon.

Our brain chemistry may very well influence belief in such ideas, but that doesn't mean the experiences are literal or universal.

The "findings" always lack repetition or rely on highly subjective interpretations.

Our brains are great at spotting patterns, even when none exist, and that's what they do.

Cultural beliefs and strong personal experiences feel real, but they don't equate to actual proof.

Being open-minded is healthy, but so is skepticism, especially when research doesn't hold up. 

Mystery isn't always magic.

As to Edgar Cayce's readings, well, according to him, Atlantis should have turned up by now, and yet....

Well as for Atlantis being fround in 1968/69 off the east coast of North America, they are still debating that one. And yet another archaeological mystery to be solved.

Bimini Road - Wikipedia

As for research holding up; what is a thought made of? electrical signals and electrochemical reactions only? or a waveform created? Can such a waveform or data thing be manipulated, recorded or transported across distances? They say or hypothesize that a thought is not made of atoms, but it is something, but what is it?

----------------

"Overview of Mind Reading AI Technologies

1. DeWave: Developed by researchers at the University of Technology Sydney, DeWave is a pioneering non-invasive AI system that translates silent thoughts into text. Users wear a snug-fitting cap that records brain waves via electroencephalography (EEG). The AI decodes these signals into text, achieving over 40% accuracy in initial tests. The goal is to improve this accuracy to around 90%, making it a viable communication tool for individuals with speech impairments. 
   
   1
   
2. Brain Decoder: A team from the University of Texas at Austin has created an AI-powered brain decoder that can translate thoughts into text with minimal training. This system uses machine learning to interpret brain responses to stories, allowing it to adapt to different individuals. This technology holds promise for helping people with aphasia, a condition that affects communication abilities. 
   
   
   
3. Brain2Qwerty: This innovative system developed by Meta translates brain signals into typed sentences without the need for invasive surgery. It utilizes a hybrid deep-learning architecture that processes EEG data to predict words or phrases based on neural activity. This method aims to provide safer communication solutions for individuals with speech or motor impairments. 
   
   
4. 4 Sources"
   

----------------

[andy06shake]

Yes yes we get it. Only science is real. Didn't you admit upthread that might not be the case?

Sheesh.

Deny Ignorance: where materialists come to deny that they are ignorant.

If you got it, you would be able to prove it UltraBudgie under laboratory conditions, which you can't, so.... 

If you wish to deny ignorance, you need to accept most scientists.

And honestly, most rational people agree that telepathy as in "i can hear your thoughts from across the room without speaking," is nonsense. 

Again, there is no credible study that has ever proved it under proper conditions.

And that's all she wrote.

[UltraBudgie]

And that's all she wrote.

I've made no such claims. But as you've invoked the mantra of the closed mind, I will follow that advice and wish you well. Enjoy such 'reality' as your blinders will allow you to perceive.

[andy06shake]

Well as for Atlantis being fround in 1968/69 off the east coast of North American, they are still debating that one. And yet another archaeological mystery to be solved.

Bimini Road - Wikipedia

As for research holding up; what is a thought made of? electrical signals and electrochemical reactions only? or a waveform created? Can such a waveform or data thing be manipulated, recorded or transported across distances? They say or hypothesize that a thought is not made of atoms, but it is something, but what is it?

----------------

"Overview of Mind Reading AI Technologies

1. DeWave: Developed by researchers at the University of Technology Sydney, DeWave is a pioneering non-invasive AI system that translates silent thoughts into text. Users wear a snug-fitting cap that records brain waves via electroencephalography (EEG). The AI decodes these signals into text, achieving over 40% accuracy in initial tests. The goal is to improve this accuracy to around 90%, making it a viable communication tool for individuals with speech impairments. 
   
   1
   
2. Brain Decoder: A team from the University of Texas at Austin has created an AI-powered brain decoder that can translate thoughts into text with minimal training. This system uses machine learning to interpret brain responses to stories, allowing it to adapt to different individuals. This technology holds promise for helping people with aphasia, a condition that affects communication abilities. 
   
   
   
3. Brain2Qwerty: This innovative system developed by Meta translates brain signals into typed sentences without the need for invasive surgery. It utilizes a hybrid deep-learning architecture that processes EEG data to predict words or phrases based on neural activity. This method aims to provide safer communication solutions for individuals with speech or motor impairments. 
   
   
4. 4 Sources"
   

----------------

Edgar Cayce described Atlantis as a highly advanced ancient civilisation with powerful technology.

How does the Bimini Road equate to anything reminiscent of the sorts, considering it may very well be a natural geological formation?

And he predicted that parts of Atlantis, especially near the Bahamas and Bimini, would resurface, as far as im aware that did not happen.

Thoughts are indeed fundamentally electrochemical signals. 

Can they be manipulated or recorded, quite possibly, but that still would not equate to telepathy as we understand the concept.

Technology, on the other hand, it would seem to tick that box.

[andy06shake]

I've made no such claims. But as you've invoked the mantra of the closed mind, I will follow that advice and wish you well. Enjoy such 'reality' as your blinders will allow you to perceive.

Well, it's what im saying, and what im claiming, as far as i understand the topic up for debate. 

And if you wish to assume people have a closed mind because they choose not to believe in magic without any sort of actual proof, that's up to you.

Proof equates to strong evidence that withstands testing and falsification, and im not seeing that at all where telepathy is concerned. 

And ile take reality as it comes ta very much.

After all, there is no other way to take it. 

Have a nice day.