I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage

[pianopraze]

so this is the talk of ufotwitter right now.

interesting pics. Time will tell.

no real context for the images. 

some remind me of that medieval ufo battle from the Middle Ages painting.

real?

disinfo?

AI?

hoax?

[Sirius]

Some contradictions in the email. "I sent this to you",  "I sent this to a hundred people", " can't say where it from", it's "from immaculate consternation" two lines down.

I don't know much about IR imaging, maybe the clue to if it's real or not is in the crosshairs.  AI tends to reuse framing and poses of subjects etc. If it's AI they would all start looking very much alike and we will be able to notice it.  AI also makes the same mistakes all the time, like 3 winged fairies or the same curve on all the wings.

[pianopraze]

Some contradictions in the email. "I sent this to you",  "I sent this to a hundred people", " can't say where it from", it's "from immaculate consternation" two lines down.

I don't know much about IR imaging, maybe the clue to if it's real or not is in the crosshairs.  AI tends to reuse framing and poses of subjects etc. If it's AI they would all start looking very much alike and we will be able to notice it.  AI also makes the same mistakes all the time, like 3 winged fairies or the same curve on all the wings.

Definitely has an AI vibe. 

5 years and we will believe nothing as AI will be too good to tell from real videos/photos

[pianopraze]

More images coming out from supposed leaker:

[putnam6]

FAWK AI is/was the prize from what TPTB has discovered from UAP/UFOs over the years, which will now be used to hide what they have and have not discovered

[Sirius]

It's not the images, it's the lack of context and the delivery. Data without context is just data, not sure what the author expected.  There is lots of things we jump on where we go "wow wtf, this is incredible" then other things you just don't know what to do with it.

[UltraBudgie]

It's not the images, it's the lack of context and the delivery. Data without context is just data, not sure what the author expected.  There is lots of things we jump on where we go "wow wtf, this is incredible" then other things you just don't know what to do with it.

this is worth quoting for truth because it goes well beyond the burry images in that pdf. it reminds me of the cartoon here



except instead of standards we are doing theories or ways of looking at data. without the ability to actively test and pursue hypotheses it all stays in the realm of the speculative and theories can't be eliminated because the valid scope of interpreting the data is undefined, by any measure of usefulness.

so okay the op got a strange email and pictures. well that is interesting, add it to the pile, but does it let us effect change? or just add to the whirlwind of databits floating around in our heads?

i do like the implication of some uaps having more complex geometric shapes however that is interesting

[pianopraze]

It's not the images, it's the lack of context and the delivery. Data without context is just data, not sure what the author expected.  There is lots of things we jump on where we go "wow wtf, this is incredible" then other things you just don't know what to do with it.

The context, for those that didn’t listen to the second video, is the person sending these images threw a hissy fit that they were not better received so now they say they won’t post any more images. 

makes it more sus on my opinion. But time will tell.

i remember the person first whistleblowing by posting the Nimitz info on ats back in the day was hassled by people on ats and also threw several hissy fits for a similar reason.