12-14-2024, 09:18 AM
I have no real disrespect or problem with Greer and his orchestrations to address the topic of alien agencies operating on Earth.
But I do feel he has become well ensconced into the collection of celebrities who have become "part" of the disclosure fantasy.
His X post touches upon the idea of telling the UFO nuts not being enough to achieve disclosure, that it has to be a wider spread event.
But then... will it ever be enough? Will anyone anywhere ever declare ".... Aaaand we have disclosure!"
No.
This is a money-maker... clicks and hits... Much like the new "drone" media-obsession, there won't be a true end to the "mystery"...
(Which explains the 'name change' to "UAP"... because the phrase "UFO" and it's multi-generational, multi-national adoption was "too vague" to be embraced by reporting agencies. Because of the fear they need to stoke over UFO's couldn't be taken seriously after they spent the whole time demeaning and vilifying anyone who used such a term....)
Over hundreds if not thousands of years the phenomenon has been recognized and reported... but today it's a "threat."
Greer correctly reports the "threat" marketing approach by the authorities... it will engender revenue streams for their cohorts... every "discloser" is an intimate member of the same industrial complex... (you know the ones,... "We need more and better weapons systems" is imprinted on everything they say.)
I predict "disclosure" will be a fleeting experience... almost insubstantial and imperceptible and ultimately "open to interpretation,"... because it's how "they" do.
But I do feel he has become well ensconced into the collection of celebrities who have become "part" of the disclosure fantasy.
His X post touches upon the idea of telling the UFO nuts not being enough to achieve disclosure, that it has to be a wider spread event.
But then... will it ever be enough? Will anyone anywhere ever declare ".... Aaaand we have disclosure!"
No.
This is a money-maker... clicks and hits... Much like the new "drone" media-obsession, there won't be a true end to the "mystery"...
(Which explains the 'name change' to "UAP"... because the phrase "UFO" and it's multi-generational, multi-national adoption was "too vague" to be embraced by reporting agencies. Because of the fear they need to stoke over UFO's couldn't be taken seriously after they spent the whole time demeaning and vilifying anyone who used such a term....)
Over hundreds if not thousands of years the phenomenon has been recognized and reported... but today it's a "threat."
Greer correctly reports the "threat" marketing approach by the authorities... it will engender revenue streams for their cohorts... every "discloser" is an intimate member of the same industrial complex... (you know the ones,... "We need more and better weapons systems" is imprinted on everything they say.)
I predict "disclosure" will be a fleeting experience... almost insubstantial and imperceptible and ultimately "open to interpretation,"... because it's how "they" do.
