Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[PorkChop96]

Well I was WAY off on whatever page this video was linked.  Had to go to Youtube to find it.
Have you watched it?
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc]

Curious what you think.

I can't look at it currently, but give me an hour or two and I will get back to you on that!

[SomeStupidName]

Just my "professional" opinion, but being that he was wearing a white shirt, the only body armor he would have been able to wear, and it be "hidden" as it was, would be soft armor that was also white and very light weight. Any round would not ricochet off of soft body armor such as that.

Sure I could be wrong, just how it looked to me.

[KKLoco]

Without any autopsy report released, the following video is the best explanation I have seen so far. The entry wound is on the right side of the head, above the hair line.

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI]


Video link on Bitchute

Yup, clearly shot in the back of the head from closer range and an elevated position. The .30-06 was the patsy's weapon. Charlie's wounds are more consistent with a .223 or 5.56. This whole thing is absolute BS.

And somebody PLEASE find me the supposed body armor he was wearing. I would love to own that. The dude was skinny, you can see his nipples. There is no such body armor that wouldn't be obviously visible through that thin white t shirt. It would have also altered his posture due to having a plate strapped to his chest. Yet he's is slumping before it happened. He wouldn't be able to do that with a plate digging in his gut.

[ARM1968]

He wasn’t wearing body armour. That has been pretty much confirmed. 

if the neck wound was the entry wound then it’s just about possibly consistent with a 30-06, except Tyler’s gun was a Mauser 98, so likely 7.92mm. Slightly bigger than even 30-06. That thing should have left an exit wound you could shove your fist through. 

Now, if what we saw was an exit wound, which would make more sense but shatter the narrative of Tyler as the shooter, then it was likely from
closer and more likely .223/5.56 NATO type round. There are many rounds as evidenced above this post, but it would have been a smaller calibre.

[Kwaka]

I agree that Charlie was not wearing any body armour. It was one theory going around at the start of this event. There is no evidence for it when looking into it.

[tarantulabite]

"He refused to wear a bulletproof vest," Charlie Kirk's widow recounts shocking details: She still wears his blood-stained necklace around her neck - LINK - LINK

Charlie Kirk refused to wear a bulletproof vest the day he was killed. His widow, Erika Kirk, revealed this to the New York Times hours after the activist's funeral

The activist had also rejected a friend's suggestion to speak in Utah behind bulletproof glass, saying he had confidence in his team and that there would be security at the university

[PorkChop96]

Well I was WAY off on whatever page this video was linked.  Had to go to Youtube to find it.
Have you watched it?
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc]

Curious what you think.

Apologies for not getting back to you sooner, my afternoon got a little busier than expected. 

I watched it late last night, I can appreciate the idea the gentlemen from the video had but I still do not believe he was wearing a hard plate armor. A couple screenshots from the video of CK getting shot is not enough to prove that to me. I would definitely need some clear slow motion video that better shows the entire seen, but at the same time I don't really want to watch that scene unfold in slow motion.

[PorkChop96]

Sure I could be wrong, just how it looked to me.

Hey, everyone has their own view of it. Just glad there are those of us here that can have a logical and casual conversation about this.

[Kwaka]

The Rabbit Hole of the Charles Kirk Sacrifice By the CIA/FBI/Mossad Goes Deep

Jeff Berwick has compiled a lot of different parts of the event.

One interesting repercussion has been how 6 of the CIA staff where Tyler was studying have been recently scrubbed from the internet. There is heat going on in the background cleaning up, did not take long to scrub the crime scene, day or two. Autopsy has been scrubbed as well.

So is the cleaning up to preserve trial integrity or keep the full story hidden and buried? When following the money and political motivations, sets a warning flag on the battle of ideas and social media.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

He wasn’t wearing body armour. That has been pretty much confirmed. 

if the neck wound was the entry wound then it’s just about possibly consistent with a 30-06, except Tyler’s gun was a Mauser 98, so likely 7.92mm. Slightly bigger than even 30-06. That thing should have left an exit wound you could shove your fist through. 

Now, if what we saw was an exit wound, which would make more sense but shatter the narrative of Tyler as the shooter, then it was likely from
closer and more likely .223/5.56 NATO type round. There are many rounds as evidenced above this post, but it would have been a smaller calibre.

1) 7x57 round that mauser 98 takes is smaller than .03-06 not slightly bigger. Its actually 3 or 4 sizes smaller even at 7.92x57 or 8x57
2) .03-06 is not just about possibly consistent it is consistent with the entrance wound
3) I agree if it was an exit wound it would have been a smaller caliber but it wasnt because exit wounds are jagged making it an entrance wound like I previously posted.