Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[putnam6]

[Thoughtful3]

DC Draino has something possibly very relevant. Could there be more than one shooter?


https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/196795230...gr%5Etweet

[putnam6]

You are a broken record....you claim my source is "right leaning" then when I show you it's not you go back to your same old "I'm going to wait for the professionals" even though you were just making assumptions about the shooter a few minutes ago. You are the king of double standards on these forums. 

You have some real problems you should probably work through on your own time.

not worth it man...

[putnam6]

DC Draino has something possibly very relevant. Could there be more than one shooter?


https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/196795230...gr%5Etweet

While we have Utah's top cop saying he  them/they acted alone? 

You think they are trying to rubber stamp it, before it gets investigated too much?

How could there be a 2nd shooter no second shot?

[Vermilion]

DC Draino has something possibly very relevant. Could there be more than one shooter?


https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/196795230...gr%5Etweet

Looks like it’s just DC Draino clickbait….

Hey DC Draino this guy has already been interviewed and cleared by state and federal authorities. Can you delete this now so random people don't think you are inferring he had anything to do with the shooting. He's a photographer from a good family in Utah, attended the event, and left. He's since made a public statement, because Candace Owens also put his photo up.
https://x.com/DiedSuddenly_/status/1967966915013513615

The photographer’s public statement here….

https://x.com/AndrewPiskadlo/status/1967852781181735173

[Harte]

Ok now you're the one making claims which means you have to be able to prove those claims 

So prove that Moosad didn't know about the event beforehand. Prove they don't have the ability to pull off this assassination

"Prove they didn't" and "prove they don't?"
You are using a logical fallacy here.
While proving a negative isn't always impossible, it is a fallacy to use it as if it means something in a logical argument.

It is your responsibility to "prove" that they did and prove that they do.

Harte

[Harte]

True, but one would think there are other places aside from a lake, a hell of a lot more obscure, which was kind of my point. 

If he's reassembled the thing, the question begs, did he want it to be found? 

Or was there some other motivation that explains his actions?

Again, just speculation.   

I don't have any answers, and the only person who does is Tyler Robinson.

It looks to me like he wanted his lover to retrieve the rifle.
The reason, as far as I can tell, is because he was incredibly naive.

Harte

[andy06shake]

It looks to me like he wanted his lover to retrieve the rifle.
The reason, as far as I can tell, is because he was incredibly naive.

Harte

Where is the evidence that he wanted anyone to retrieve the rifle?

Honest question.

[Vermilion]

Where is the evidence that he wanted anyone to retrieve the rifle?

Honest question.

His lover says there was a conversation on discord saying he needed him to retrieve a rifle from a drop point and giving details on where he dropped it.

[quintessentone]

His lover says there was a conversation on discord saying he needed him to retrieve a rifle from a drop point and giving details on where he dropped it.

"In a statement to ABC News, a Discord spokesperson said, “[W]e identified a Discord account associated with the suspect but have found no evidence that the suspect planned this incident or promoted violence on Discord. The messages referenced in recent reporting about planning details do not appear to be Discord messages. These were communications between the suspect’s roommate and a friend after the shooting, where the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere.”"

Did Discord cover up Tyler Robinson’s confession? Platform under fire for ‘no evidence’ remark on Charlie Kirk’s murder

Looks like not all the facts are there, for a there to be there.