Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[Oldcarpy2]

That's unfair.  When the father learned that the son did the crime, he turned the son in.   That means probably if they had an inkling that the son was capable before this, they most likely would have had intervention.    You don't know what, if any, signs there were before this.   At this point, all indications are there were none.  At least that's what has come out.

The family being MAGA are irrelevant.   
The son obviously wasn't since he badmouthed and then murdered one of MAGAs big stars.

OK.  You don't know, I don't know.

At this point, it's all just speculation.

Which is what we are doing.

[cherokeetroy]

It’s not doxxing.
If you don’t want to look like a demon in public then don’t grave dance publicly for everyone to see.
This is common sense.

And you believe employing a Public Humiliation Campaign is going to have a stabilizing effect on the mentality ill?

[ANNEE]

No one.  But they seem to have overlooked that he was a radicalised murderous nut job?

His family sure didn't know him.

They know themselves and the facade they put forward.

[IAMTAT]

Robinson was having a gay old time, joking around with friends on Discord after he'd just killed Charlie Kirk.

"Screenshots from a 20-person Discord group, shared with The New York Times by a former high school acquaintance, capture Robinson logging in around 1 p.m. on Thursday, just as federal agents circulated grainy surveillance images of a lanky figure in dark clothing navigating the university stairwell. 

One friend wasted no time spotting the resemblance, tagging Robinson’s username and attaching the FBI photos with a simple query: “wya”—slang for “where you at?”—followed by a skull emoji.

Robinson fired back almost immediately, brushing it off with a deflection that bordered on absurdity. His “doppelganger,” he wrote, was trying to “get me in trouble.”

The chat spiraled from there into a macabre thread of dark humor, with another user piling on: “Tyler killed Charlie!!!!”

Someone floated the idea of cashing in on the FBI’s $100,000 reward by turning him in, Robinson didn’t flinch. “Only if I get a cut,” he shot back, his avatar a cartoonish image of Garfield’s hapless owner, John Arbuckle.
 Even as a massive dragnet swept Utah—complete with tips flooding in from across the state—Robinson leaned into the absurdity.

A friend warned, “Whatever you do, don’t go to a mcdonalds anytime soon,” nodding to the infamous arrest of Luigi Mangione, the suspect in a separate high-profile CEO slaying, who was nabbed at a fast-food joint in Manhattan.

Robinson played along, escalating the farce: “better also get rid of this manifesto and exact copy rifle I have lying around.”

When talk turned to the engravings on the ammo, Robinson mocked the emerging narrative outright.

“in a red state??? nah CLEARLY the shooter was from California,” he typed, pinning blame on a coastal boogeyman while dismissing the FBI’s probe as sloppy theater staged by some “dude in the briefing room.”

https://patriot.tv/tyler-robinsons-disco...is-photos/

[UltraBudgie]

No one.  But they seem to have overlooked that he was a radicalised murderous nut job?

No. Don't call him radicalized. Far too many in the vile mainstream would say they sympathize with what they imagine his motives to be, if they weren't currently afraid of being called out on it. That's not radical. That's an undercurrent of denial and lack of self-reflection running right through hateful ideology, not the fringes. Not extremist, not radical, not "far" anything. This is a slipped mask moment, perhaps, with nihilistic fester beneath.

So don't call it those things. Radical, extreme, far-left, anything. Because you know the game. Reflection. Throw those labels, and they'll throw them right back. They'll say you're the extremist. You're the radical. You're the bigot. Far-right lunatic. You know it will happen. It already is happening:

"Charlie Kirk" was a far-right extremist American bigot who spent his career promoting far-right extremist bigotry of many kinds. He focused most especially upon college campuses, where he worked very successfully and lucratively to radicalize young people and to expand the margins of permission as regards bigoted speech and action generally. He would set up camp at a folding table with a microphone next to a sign that said PROVE ME WRONG. And a lot of people would prove him wrong, too, and then Charlie Kirk would prove how extremist right-wing bigots like Charlie Kirk utilize the trappings of debate—not as a way of coming to mutual understanding, but as a tool to normalize extremist ideology, which he would accomplish via the trick of making a big show of refusing to be persuaded by truth no matter how wrong he had just been proved.

https://www.the-reframe.com/acceptable-losses/

Bigotry. Bigotry is unreasoning intolerance of opposing viewpoints. How much of that do you see in the left? In America? A hell of a lot, I can tell you. Recognize the game, because it's not a game.

[IDELB2006]

You are doubling down on propaganda.
It is blatantly obvious he was not talking about all mentally ill homeless people.
Your dishonesty is criminal IMO, not free speech.
You are clearly 'shouting fire in a crowded theatre.'

Indeed it is mentally ill people who would be more prone to acting on incitement.

Stop lying.

Link
If you won't believe the msm, maybe you will believe the apology from Kilmeade himself.

During an appearance on the “Fox & Friends" weekend show Sunday, Kilmeade said that “I wrongly said they should get lethal injection. I apologize for that extremely callous remark. I am obviously aware that not all mentally ill, homeless people act as the perpetrator did in North Carolina and that so many homeless people deserve our empathy and compassion.”

[Oldcarpy2]

UltraBudgie wrote:

"Bigotry. Bigotry is unreasoning intolerance of opposing viewpoints. How much of that do you see in the left? Iln America? A hell of a lot, I can tell you. Recognize the game, because it's not a game."


Yes.  But there is bigotry on both sides.

[UltraBudgie]

Yes.  But there is bigotry on both sides.

Of the pond? I agree.

[Oldcarpy2]

Of the pond? I agree.

Oh yes.  

[bts]

And you believe employing a Public Humiliation Campaign is going to have a stabilizing effect on the mentality ill?

When one sees his opponent humiliating himself, lend a helping hand.