Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[SurferSoul]

Just wondering has anyone figured out what that security guy was doing waving his arms about in a strange fashion behind Kirk just before the assassination?

[UKTRUTH]

But then the definition of what's unacceptable can be politicized to do things like try to extradite US citizens to the UK.

If you knowingly and repeatedly incite people to hurt or kill another individual then you should be extradited if the person you have targeted is from another country.

I do not know what is controversial here.  There is no version of free speech anywhere that allows a person to deliberately incite violence and death upon another.

[UltraBudgie]

So while they decide not to disclose the Epstein files on the very same day of the of the Kirk assassination, they also get to use it as an excuse to introduce legislation to crack down on people expressing their opinions. Two birds with one stone! 

Hey, and don't forget dissent over Ukraine or Israel policy—three birds!

[cherokeetroy]

Compiling a searchable database of over 50,000 radical leftists identities and their employers. Say "NO" to political violence.

Our technical developers are hard at work sorting through our data and ensuring a proper upload. Submissions will always remain open, and the list of identities will be continuously updated. This is not a one-time drop. We apologize for the delay.
We are nearing 50,000 identities. Keep going.

https://x.com/forcharliekirk1

Stick around, this is only going to get better.

How are people being selected for this database

Can anyone submit anyone? What's the criteria and who's running it

[Solvedit]

If you knowingly and repeatedly incite people to hurt or kill another individual then you should be extradited if the person you have targeted is from another country.

Did Kirk knowingly and repeatedly incite?  I hadn't heard.

You're banging that drum because he dared criticize LGBTQ.  

So what won't we be able to publicly discuss?

[FlyersFan]

More info showing the shooter was an unhinged lefty pissed at trans stuff and not moosad.
The shooter, Robinson, and his trans partner Twiggs were into 'furry' lifestyle.
Trans people and others get off sexually by people dressing up as animals and being sexual.
Sexual furry cartoons and special 'furry' phrases are part of the furry culture.
Both the shooter and partner have been linked to a furry website with sexual stuff on it.
And the bullets that were recovered from the Kirk shooting had some furry jargon on them.
That's important ... the bullets with the 'furry' phrases on them ... 

Kirk Shooter Robinsons Trans Partner and 'furry' lifestyle

It has now been widely reported that Twiggs was transitioning genders, and was allegedly in a romantic relationship with Robinson.

 Daily Mail can also reveal that Robinson has been linked to a ‘furry’ website.

A username associated with the alleged assassin has an account on ‘FurAffinity.net’, a site catering to people with a proclivity for humanoid animal illustrations and dressing up in fur suits.  Many of the cartoon animal characters pictured on the site are in sexualized poses.

Robinson used the account name ‘craftin247’ on various videogaming and online accounts, his friends told Daily Mail.

 
There is an account by that name on FurAffinity, registered on July 22, 2025, two months before Kirk's fatal shooting on Wednesday at Utah Valley University.

The revelation comes after law enforcement found bullets inscribed with messages including ‘Notices, bulges, OwO what’s this?’, a phrase associated with an internet meme often used by ‘furries’.  Other online accounts viewed by Daily Mail explicitly link a person called ‘Tyler Robinson’ to the username ‘Craftin247’.

[andy06shake]

I should be angry, but as I mentioned, I'm disgusted. You sound like a person who doesn't take accountability. There is always going to be conflict when opposing ideas meet, but to make progress a discussion should be started. You seem keen on avoiding your past involvement in division tactics, where I expect an adult to be responsible for their actions. 

Not only have you tried to pass the buck, in doing so you've proven my point about the common left mentality. "Which stands to reason." 

Although you didn't provide much, I responded to every implication or accusation you threw at me, and you avoided any subject that "conflicts" with your ideology. Lmao, "which stands to reason."

It's crazy how often actions speak louder than words, even in a virtual setting.

Edited to stay on topic: This mentality you have is what promotes these actions from the left.

Again, I'm not the topic up for debate, as much as you would seem to like me to be. 

And that's nice, but it's also pure projection and a baited monologue, not even a critique.

""You're"" conflating disagreement with left mentality while ignoring the facts.

Different ideas don't automatically equate to division tactics Jefefeesh.

And accountability is not as partisan as you seem to think.

Labeling an entire ideology as responsible for violence without evidence is intellectually lazy.

What's crazy is how triggered you seem to be over mere disagreement.

And you're reducing the debate to insult rather than rigorous argument.

If you have some sort of issue with me or my actions, i suggest you take it to DM and stop derailing the thread with your nonsensical personal attacks.

[cherokeetroy]

No.  My points stand.   

And you have it backwards.  I don't have to disprove what you said.  YOU have to prove what you said.  Prove that Moosad knew ahead of time that this was happening.  Prove that they were involved.  Go ahead.  Good luck with that.  

My points stand.   The event was only advertised 9 days before it happened.  There wasn't time for Moosad to find an unhinged patsy, enrage them to the point of murder, train them, and get them to do the job.   And the fact is that Kirk was very pro-Israel.  Even if he was asking questions for the past two weeks as some claim (but haven't proven), that doesn't raise Kirk to the level of being someone that Moosad would want to take out. 

Common sense and Occams Razor ... it wasn't Moosad.

I'm not claiming you have to prove anything 

I'm saying you're not "Moosad" (you're characterizing them as if they don't exist. Odd)

Which means you don't know the inner workings of Moosad, therefore, your point is baseless

[andy06shake]

The main question i would like answered is why the gun was found reassembled?

Psychological factor, like a desire to maintain control over the situation?

Puzzling if you ask me.

I suppose he will be asked.

[FlyersFan]

I'm saying you're not "Moosad" (you're characterizing them as if they don't exist. Odd)

Which means you don't know the inner workings of Moosad, therefore, your point is baseless

I didn't say that they don't exist.  I said they are the best in the world.

My points are valid.    Kirk was a strong supporter of Israel.   Supposedly (not proven) he asked questions in the past two weeks.   Nothing that would have gotten Moosad all worked up.    Moosad simply did not have enough time to get uptight about Kirk, find a patsy, get the patsy worked up into a murderous frenzy, train the patsy, and pull off the assassination ... all within 9 days.

Common sense.   Occams Razor.    It's not Moosad.   It's just what it looks like and what all the evidence points to ... an unhinged lefty with trans ties snaps and murders someone he disagrees with.    

You have not addressed any of the points.  You just say 'they are baseless' when they are not.