Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[quintessentone]

So no defense as usual

I don't know what you are talking about now. 

I asked you to provide evidence and facts as to the assassin's motives and you just deflect.

[argentus]

I've been reading that too.

Seems to me -- this is happening more and more.  That there's no clear cut belief -- they seem to get all jumbled up in many beliefs.

I would guess that the core of the problem -- at least socially -- is that people, since about 15 years ago have gradually lost the ability to engage in civil discourse, that is, to tolerate opinions different from theirs without going batshit crazy.   I have seen this phenomena growing where I live, and it makes me unwilling to respond to people who pretend to bring up an news item, but project their view and are desperate for opposition, because they already have their contrary viewpoints saved.  It is disasterous to normal discourse.   We should be able to sit around a metaphorical campfire and talk about things without going all cray-cray.  Right?  Right?

[RazorV66]

You guys provide no evidence or facts at all.

Post the facts so I can be educated.

How's this for facts for you......



 

Keep on justifying Kirk's murder.

[quintessentone]

I've been reading that too.

Seems to me -- this is happening more and more.  That there's no clear cut belief -- they seem to get all jumbled up in many beliefs.

The assassin has lawyerd up and is not talking, so all we have to go on is his online footprint, which right now points to being a part of the Goyper Army, which is against Trump and his administration, and who went to Kirk's debates to confront him.

[RichardHurt]

How's this for facts for you......

[Video: https://youtu.be/dy3f4FFwgPU?si=_eu3PFovm5qqu4aF]
 

Keep on justifying Kirk's murder.

The title of the video itself really negates the message.
If the title had been the left then maybe, but it did not.
That title just ensures the algorithm accelerates the view to those that look for such a thing.
Math

[quintessentone]

How's this for facts for you......

[Video: https://youtu.be/dy3f4FFwgPU?si=_eu3PFovm5qqu4aF]
 

Keep on justifying Kirk's murder.

How do callous people on that video prove that the assassin was a Leftie? It does not.

I'm just posting Kirk's messaging as told by others who debated and interviewed him. Debunk them, if you can.

[Shoshanna]

How's this for facts for you......

[Video: https://youtu.be/dy3f4FFwgPU?si=_eu3PFovm5qqu4aF]
 

Keep on justifying Kirk's murder.

I watched a different compilation of these earlier. I have to say these people piss me off and nobody read anything into this but I do understand how people become radicalized now. Because these people talking like this about a man with two little kids and a wife who loved him and who was only trying to have an open discourse with people makes me sick in a way I can't even describe.

[DBCowboy]

I don't know what you are talking about now. 

I asked you to provide evidence and facts as to the assassin's motives and you just deflect.

This is why your posts are bullshit.

What is known is that the assassin killed Kirk because of leftist sewage spilling into the internet.

You are responsible.

YOU.

[argentus]

While I don't personally use those words and they don't bother me at all, I do find the overuse weakens both the intended affects and the humor value.

Agree.  They should be used judiciously for  point and effect.   I was only encouraging a member who just recently discovered we could use them.  ;o)

[IAMTAT]

I would guess that the core of the problem -- at least socially -- is that people, since about 15 years ago have gradually lost the ability to engage in civil discourse, that is, to tolerate opinions different from theirs without going batshit crazy.   
We should be able to sit around a metaphorical campfire and talk about things without going all cray-cray.  Right?  Right?

And THAT was exactly what Charlie Kirk personified, believed in and put into actual practice...right up until the very moment he was killed for it.