Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[Oldcarpy2]

Except, it’s not, and ATS wasn’t the “MAGA echo chamber” you think it was. Many liberal cry-babies came running here and set up the lib stroke fest, enjoying a reprieve of having to face objective reality in an open discussion. Now that ATS is officially gone and more of the OGs from there have migrated to here you are, once again, faced with the mirror of reality. Sorry if that chaps your nethers.

See what I mean?

Yes, ATS was a right wing echo chamber.

DI is not and I hope it will never be.

"Liberal cry babies"?

That's just pathetic and proves my point.

[AnAlternateOpinion]

quintessentone Wrote:
Because some of his words were peddling hate, racism, misogyny etc. that is why.

No he wasn't.   Not even remotely true.

Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

So none of that is even remotely hateful? Okay, got it.

[quintessentone]

I'm sure you will understand when most people here will say they do not believe you.

You aren't American.  You don't live here.   You engage in an endless stream of left wing rhetoric and attempts to try to get Americans to think leftie.  ... and you dare challenge me as to how I'd know anything about Bluesky and that I could only know about it if I participated at it? 

   Hypocrisy.   

Bluesky is a left wing temper tantrum ... a bubble for left wing to blather in because they left Twitter when it went to true freedom of speech.  They can't handle it.   It's an irrational stinking mess.   Myopic.   A left wing version of Trumps right wing Truthsocial.

I know you better than you think. ha ha

I listen to centrist Americans' as well as other foreign takes on politics and other global subjects. My open mind expands beyond your country, whereas it is doubtful your optics expand beyond Fox News.

[Moon68]

[Moon68]

quintessentone Wrote:
Because some of his words were peddling hate, racism, misogyny etc. that is why.


Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

So none of that is even remotely hateful? Okay, got it.

And that’s a lie. You should factcheck yourself before making those assertions.

[FlyersFan]

Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

Most of that has been debunked, the muslim thing is true and has merit,  and the women submitting to husbands is a personal religious belief within his religion.

Guess  you missed the part about Stephen King apologizing yesterday for having repeated that bunk about Kirk wanting to stone to death gay people ...  

You are pushing a false narrative.

[CriticalStinker]

Well that's all fine and dandy but when you write on a bullet casing "Hey Fascist...Catch" and murder a Conservative with that bullet, there is really not much ambiguity in the motive.

MAGA Conservatives has been labeled as Fascist for over 10 years now.

Here’s the thing. Each and every time this happens, no matter the motive, ideology, or any other factor… People try and make sense of the matter, and assign broader blame. That’s a natural instinct to make sense of the world.

But people who are willing to throw away their life, and take the life of someone they’ve never met aren’t sane. Most of the actions they take before and after aren’t going to be sane either. And whether or not you agree with big groups of people, assigning the actions of the absolute worst people who have clearly lost it to people who had nothing to do with them is not sensible.

[Encia22]

LAST AND FINAL WARNING

STOP with the off-topics

STOP with the personal attacks

STOP with the political trolling

THIS IS NOT A MUD PIT!


Official warnings incoming for repeated violations!

Do not reply to this post.

[Oldcarpy2]

[InsulindianFox]