60 Minutes: UAP

[putnam6]

Excellent post! Snipped key point for response.

I can't believe they would, either.
You and I and many others know by now that almost everything from any source of media is designed to make a customer out of anyone who will give them a second glance. Sometimes it's not deliberately nefarious per se, only marketing. That doesn't outright imply everything in the media is a flat out lie; only that context manipulation and selective information release is often used to emphasize or manufacture a point--a point which is engineered to maximize audience attention and retention.


Media outlets accumulate large audiences. These media outlets distribute stories derived from information given to them by "someone" who wants them to have it. That "someone" could be a government entity (DOD, foreign government, etc), a large corporation, a wealthy individual, or a number of other sources. These sources only give media outlets information which is intended for public consumption - the "media" simply engineers stories from that information to turn a profit and increase viewership.

This is one reason why "disclosure" in the traditional sense is not worth anticipating at this point. Most sources of information are compromised or sketchy in some way. It's not a good idea to listen at face value.

There are plenty of unconventional aircraft, vehicles, and other examples of rapidly developing technology flying around in the atmosphere and traversing water and land. In the interest of national (and global) security, it would be unwise to disclose information about who knows or understands any given unconventional device, who is manufacturing or operating them, and yes, whether or not any (or how many) of these objects originated on this planet to begin with.

In short, take what you hear with a grain of salt.

UAPs/UFOs were a big reason I  joined ATS, as a complete novice with no personal experiences we always would discuss how disclosure would look. Much like other paranormal or cryptid phenomena, it's always been a past time, a balance against just following more mainstream topics. But basically, if the military brass isn't losing thier minds over it this, how bad can it be? 

That realization doesn't mean whatever the story is or isn't is still a huge story for those of us who say Yes I know, but what if? 

But Im an alternative history nerd too... 

The military though just seems so damn sure of themselves and their capabilities, and I know they are openly the best military the most financed and supported in the world. Behind the scenes have heard rumors and stories Military tech is 40-50 years ahead   

How would somebody from1918 look at an early jet fighter

This leaves me my thoughts we have been lied too since the 80s if not earlier, about the Soviet Sino threat, or atleast about America's capabilities to counter the issue