|
Andrew is ordered to appear at Congress to explain his links to paedophile Jeffrey Ep
(11-08-2025, 02:08 PM)chr0naut Wrote: "semi-implicated"? Trump is semi-implicated. There are just rumors with him. Whereas Andrew actually had pictures taken with one of the victims and was sued and lost. (paid off victim) I think Trump is up to his eyeballs in this ... but he's not implicated like Andrew was. (so far) 
11-08-2025, 02:59 PM
(11-08-2025, 02:46 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Trump is semi-implicated. That's because he ain't releasing the stuff that may or not implicate him. Wonder why? No, Andrew didn't lose. He just paid her £12 million without any admission Like you do. I once settled a civil fraud claim against a Director of a Blue Chip UK company without any admission of guilt. For £1,100,000.00. With a straight face. Sort of....
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
11-08-2025, 04:32 PM
(11-08-2025, 02:46 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Trump is semi-implicated. The italicized sections below are just a few of the many instances/allegations taken from Wikipedia: "I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop, but he did not," Jane Doe wrote in a formal declaration accompanying her recent suits. "Defendant Trump responded to my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. ... Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump's sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed if not killed." - She accused both Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of forcibly raping her when she was 13 years old at underage sex parties at Epstein's Manhattan residence in 1994 and twice applied to take the case to court. ------------ On October 25, 2016, allegations were made by two men stating that Trump had attended and partaken in sex parties filled with underage minor females as young as 15 years old who were induced with promises of career advancement. Illegal drugs were also alleged to have been provided to the minors. One man was identified as model and actor Andy Lucchesi, while the other was identified as a fashion photographer who spoke on condition of anonymity. Both men claim to have been acquaintances of Trump during that decade, which one described as his "Trump days". Lucchesi, for his part, said that he saw Trump engage in sexual activity with the girls but did not witness him taking illicit drugs. ------------ Miss Teen USA contestants (1997) Mariah Billado, Miss Vermont Teen USA, is one of five women to mention such a dressing room visit incident in 1997. Billado said of the visit: "I remember putting on my dress really quick, because I was like, 'Oh my god, there's a man in here.' Trump, she recalled, said something like, 'Don't worry, ladies, I've seen it all before.'" Billado recalled talking to Ivanka, Trump's daughter, who responded "Yeah, he does that." Victoria Hughes, Miss New Mexico Teen USA, also said Trump did conduct a dressing room visit, and that the youngest contestant there was 15. The dressing room had 51 contestants, each with their own stations. Eleven girls said they did not see Trump enter the dressing room, though some said it was possible that he had entered while they were somewhere else, or that they did not notice. ------------ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...pstein.png What was the secret? What was implied by the birthday letter and its graphics, overall? ------------ Court records showed that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least seven times over four years in the 1990s. ------------- A 2002 article in New York magazine quoted Trump talking about Epstein: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life." In a 2017 recording, Epstein stated that he was "Donald's closest friend for ten years." -------------- According to a post published by Elon Musk on June 6, 2025, as part of the Trump–Musk feud, Trump appeared in the files related to Jeffrey Epstein. He stated it was the real reason why the files have not been made public. Trump's top strategist, Steve Bannon, said that Trump lawyer "Marc Kasowitz 'took care' of 100 women during the [2016] presidential campaign". -------------- In 2020, the Michigan Journal of Gender & Law called for a government inquiry into Trump's sexual misconduct, arguing that existing civil litigation and media accounts had not adequately addressed Trump's sexual misconduct. There have been so many accusations of sexual misconduct, so much evidence, so many accusers, and some of the charges upheld in court. I don't think that there has been anyone in the media's eye in the last 100 years that has that many sexual misconduct allegations against them. Either he was implicated, or he wasn't. There's no such thing as semi-implication (So many Trump supporters seem to have real problems with absolutes in the English language). Clearly, he has been implicated.
Support the Christchurch Call
11-09-2025, 07:22 AM
(11-08-2025, 02:46 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Trump is semi-implicated. Hence, the feet dragging, redactions, and obfuscation. Trump's buried up to his arse also. The difference being. He still has his cherry-picked sycophant government lackeys. Like Pam Bondi and Kash Patel. Who willing choose to hide and wipe away his incriminating sh@t. Prince Noncey boy, not so much anymore.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
11-09-2025, 09:28 AM
Not may are mentioning Big Red, has her endorsement of Wedgewood expired?.
If Big Red doesn't shift into oblivion, we as a society can do better.
I was not here.
11-09-2025, 09:45 AM
(11-09-2025, 09:28 AM)BeTheGoddess Wrote: Not may are mentioning Big Red, ... Fast forward to 2 minutes into this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5It705JOkk Sarah Ferguson fears 'dark forces' .. and she's drinking a lot ...
11-09-2025, 10:40 AM
(11-09-2025, 09:45 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: Fast forward to 2 minutes into this video "Dark forces" are not necessarily domestic, and most likely not. "never complain, never explain" That was what ERII told her firm. So stating "dark forces'' given the current environment, its prolly not just "in house", she would not complain if it in house. My opinion only. Im sure more stains will come out in the wash..
I was not here.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
