05-15-2025, 11:36 AM
(05-15-2025, 09:37 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: I'd start calling it Sinai now. Lots of Jewish things called Sinai, Israel probably sees it as theirs already. Also will work well with the twilight-language of news in the 2030s -- Sinai, "Sin AI". Egypt mainland can't defend it without external support. Plus pushing the population there will lead to a hostile "terrorist stronghold", a nuisance providing provocation which conveniently must be dealt with via incursion "securing" the area. Temporarily or permanently? There is no "permanently" on the borders of a powerfully-backed expansionist state.
sigh...
A new hostile terrorist stronghold and having to secure it via incursion, as opposed to the current hostile terrorist stronghold they are currently securing via incursion?
Can't have your own sovereign country so soon after 10/7, while elements of Hamas remain. They get a rebuild and a chance to reject Hamas and find another style of governing body. Doesn't mean it's right or wrong; it just is the reality of the situation
I thought the premise was temporary settlements in the Sinai, for some, the rest have a humanitarian area within Gaza, as it is being rebuilt. The Sinai Gazans will be allowed to return once in groups, as section after section of Gaza gets rebuilt. This all might be secured by the US military, which I am against pretty much completely.
However, rebuilding Gaza and letting all relocated Gazans return is the only way to turn down the heat. The West Bank, Jordan, and Egypt would be constantly boiling over otherwise.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
![[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/PEART-2744335652.gif)
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
![[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/PEART-2744335652.gif)



