(01-05-2026, 08:27 AM)SomeStupidName Wrote: It may be a insult but that is because the level narcissism you people have.
Assigning such a psychological imbalance to such a large, diverse and general group as those that have questioned his actions is really not reasonable. Nearly everyone of his acquaintances, even his own supporters, have questioned his actions and words. And he
always responds with denials, from which there is no history of him ever backing down, even when there is hard evidence that he did, or said, it and that he was wrong.
Trump, however, definitely has been diagnosed with malignant narcissistic psychopathy:
Clinical and Scholarly Assessments of Donald J. Trump
Quote:1 he was falsely accused of things he did not do and I don't mean just online they used international help to conjure up fake evidence that the knew was 100% fake and used to illegally obtain warrants to spy on him.
The warrants were not illegally obtained.
After the 911 attacks, in the name of 'homeland security', permission to spy on the US public, rubber stamped by the FISA courts, through Federal agencies such as the NSA and the FBI, has been granted and is reviewed and signed-off by whomever is the US President every four years. This is usually done early in each Presidential term, so Trump has
twice approved federal agencies spying on US citizens.
Data is now being collected on you, as well as all other US citizens such as Donald Trump, and he has
twice agreed to grant it definition as a legal action, despite the fact that such a process is contrary to the US Constitution.
Quote:If he is such a monster that wouldn't have been necessary and anyone okay with that has a serious mental issue. 2 He's not special he just said the shit people wanted to hear that's what politicians do and then they hardly ever deliver yet he did on a few things not all but a few and it was more than any politician had up into that point.
Trump has achieved a few things that get news reportage. But, significantly, he has claimed that he has done things that he has not done, or even partly achieved.
It is untrue that politicians hardly ever deliver. They do break promises, but they do achieve more things than they don't. In that regard, Trump has been about the same in actual delivery, leaving major promises (like his desert wall) barely started (at great cost to the US public and even, if you recall, to the significant disruption of the US Federal government).
At the same time, Trump had promised tariffs, but I don't think that, pre-election, the public had any notion of the stupidly high rates of tariffs that he has implemented. I think his problem is that he has poor mathematical skills and gets by with bluster and everyone thinks he is just exaggerating.
Quote:I get it not liking the guy but calling him and all us Hitlers and racists even calling black people uncle Tom's just for being conservative is wildly delusional, so you can take your butt hurt feelings to your shrink because you fuelled the term TDS with your behavior.
Trump
is a racist. As are many of his adherents. You might be blind to it, but his policies do not have the same outcomes regardless of ethnicity. He
strongly vilifies particular ethnicities again and again in his speeches. He was once prosecuted for denying black families from being able to get accommodation in a property he managed. Very few racists are actually prosecuted for it.
Trump isn't Hitler, but he is fascistic and dictatorial.
Trump cannot negotiate like a statesman, it's either his way or it is conflict, and this amplifies the issues created when he is just wrong, because he cannot concede that there is another way.
Also, I have never called black people "Uncle Toms". It's not a term I would use. Please do not accuse me of things that you think someone else may have done, or of me being a part of some group that all collaborate to disagree with Trump (or you).
I also don't think that someone from the Democratic Party would have called someone an "Uncle Tom", either. To me, it just sounds like the type of language that a racist pundit would try and use about somebody else.