7 |
398 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:20 PM)chr0naut Wrote: The right also oppose Trump. He is extremely disloyal to everyone. Especially his grassroots and closest associates, and now they are waking up to it.
A List of Trump’s Allies Who Are Turning Against Him
In fairness to all concerned, that story is extremely biased and slanted. The opposite of what they claim may be more accurate.  It's a buffalo chaps stroll
6 |
1,428 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:15 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Are you for or against the fraud squad that has found billions in taxpayer fraud?
I'm for any proving and hopefully recapturing of fraud against our government and the taxpayers.
At the very least, anyone proven to have defrauded us should be convicted and serve time.
7 |
398 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:25 PM)C_rad001 Wrote: King Charles just left the Dias after speaking to the US CONGRESS.
can anyone tell me (us citizen) why I should care?
honest question
Because a Congresswoman that stood up for Him said he is King Charles III (the one hundredth eleventh)
it's Fizzies Ding Dong Drizly
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:30 PM)CriticalStinker Wrote: I'm for any proving and hopefully recapturing of fraud against our government and the taxpayers.
At the very least, anyone proven to have defrauded us should be convicted and serve time.
Now how many administrations prior have investigated this level of fraud?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
6 |
1,428 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:37 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Now how many administrations prior have investigated this level of fraud?
None that I can think of.
Should that excuse direct foreign investment right before a politician takes office, and makes said region a highlight of foreign policy? I personally don't think so, but I could see how some could maybe excuse it because it's part of their political camp.
6 |
1,606 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:26 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Maybe because the right wing is just as corrupt.
Trump is truly the only 3rd party candidate we'll see in our lifetime.
Maybe almost all the politicians on both wings are "true believers" in their respective ideologies, and are trying to do their best for their constituents, and Trump is the corrupt one?
Trump is only about himself there's nothing 'party' like about a solo narcissist (except perhaps with his close buddy, Epstein, a decade ago).
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:44 PM)CriticalStinker Wrote: None that I can think of.
Should that excuse direct foreign investment right before a politician takes office, and makes said region a highlight of foreign policy? I personally don't think so, but I could see how some could maybe excuse it because it's part of their political camp.
Jesus, you just admitted that no other admin has attacked this much fraud bet it's just not good enough for you.
You are just anti-Trump.
FFS.
He could cure cancer and you'd rally for all the oncology practices going out of business.
Tell me again you aren't a fucking leftist.
Jesus.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:48 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Maybe almost all the politicians on both wings are "true believers" in their respective ideologies, and are trying to do their best for their constituents, and Trump is the corrupt one?
Trump is only about himself there's nothing 'party' like about a solo narcissist (except perhaps with his close buddy, Epstein, a decade ago).
There you go.
Trust the establishment politicians.
FFS
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
6 |
1,606 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:30 PM)govshill2 Wrote: In fairness to all concerned, that story is extremely biased and slanted. The opposite of what they claim may be more accurate. It's a buffalo chaps stroll
[Image: https://media.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc.../giphy.gif]
Why is it that Trump fanbois always say that anything against Trump is biased. Perhaps it's just the truth and you don't want to admit that you were so easily decieved.
He sacked Bondi specifically because she totally and unrelentingly supported him, but her lies, in his defence, were discovered. Trump is a traitor to his associates, just like he is a tax-cheating traitor to the country.
The guy is more Mafia Don than President, and he always have been. And almost all of his businesses have tanked over the years, yet he stayed wealthy. That's because not everything is 'on the books' and because he used his position to wipe the convictions - but he is still a crook, really - entirely and without a doubt.
Trump has been a financial fraud for decades - The Hill
Trump Organization found guilty on all counts of criminal tax fraud
Trump’s tax returns released by House committee show he paid little in taxes
Trump appeals ruling that kept fraud case intact, wiped penalty
There's also that Epstein stuff he is implicated in.
What would happen if the US President was a monster?
6 |
1,428 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-03-2026, 08:49 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Jesus, you just admitted that no other admin has attacked this much fraud bet it's just not good enough for you.
You are just anti-Trump.
FFS.
He could cure cancer and you'd rally for all the oncology practices going out of business.
Tell me again you aren't a fucking leftist.
Jesus.
I made a calm point that I don’t think proven direct foreign investment into our politicians is a good thing.
I don’t think many leftists would give the concession that did… noting I don’t expect wealthy people to have to completely sit on their money. I said broad domestic investment/profit off of our markets should even be viewed as wrong.
I think that is reasonable.
More of our foreign aid has gone to one region more than any on this planet. None of those countries have helped us in our wars, yet we’ve given them tax payer money, and they in turn influence our elections with lobbying efforts.
The issue you brought up is completely separate to that. Implying I’m a fucking leftist for weighing them separately is just strange to me. It’s simple logic. There’s not a single president that I’ve absolved from wrongdoing because they did something else good. There’s not even a president in my lifetime that I think did anything great for the average American. It’s not like I’m treating Trump uniquely here.
|