Trump says he bombed Iran

[DBCowboy]

The grading scale should be based on who's closest aligned with the Constitution 

Not lesser of two evils

But our government has been co-opted by cult of the left vs cult of the right

When you're dealing with cults, the criteria is devotion, dogma and worship

WTF???

You're saying Trump doesn't align with the Constitution?

How?

[ReturnofBroccoli]

WTF???

You're saying Trump doesn't align with the Constitution?

How?

Suggesting a 3rd term violates the 22nd amendment you can't deny that 


Well you could deny it but there's evidence of him saying it. 

Also, In a May 2025 interview, when asked if he felt compelled to uphold the Constitution, he responded, "I don't know" which isn't exactly a F%$! Yeah

[CriticalStinker]

WTF???

You're saying Trump doesn't align with the Constitution?

How?

An executive order against a constitutional amendment. I agree we need to address birthright citizenship, but a President making an executive order against a constitutional amendments shouldn't last 15 minutes. It's a bad precedence.

FISA

Blanket tariffs on every country. This has proven to be illegal. President has a scope for national security, and that's so that we can be nimble as foreign policy happens fast. But going against all nations shouldn't be decided by one person.

Going after people, citizens or not, for speech against another nation that we don't have any formal treaties with.

Allowing private AI companies to go into our files at the federal government.

Those are the ones I can think off the top of my head.

[DBCowboy]

Suggesting a 3rd term violates the 22nd amendment you can't deny that 


Well you could deny it but there's evidence of him saying it. 

Also, In a May 2025 interview, when asked if he felt compelled to uphold the Constitution, he responded, "I don't know" which isn't exactly a F%$! Yeah

I'm talking policies, not trolling the media.

FFS

If he ran again, I'd be against it.

Though I'd still vote for him for the lutz.

[chr0naut]

The grading scale should be based on who's closest aligned with the Constitution 

Not lesser of two evils

But our government has been co-opted by cult of the left vs cult of the right

When you're dealing with cults, the criteria is devotion, dogma and worship

The US Constitution is not comprehensive enough, nor well written and unambiguous.

I would suggest that legal frameworks should be built on the most robust of the most universally agreed 'human rights documents' as their primary, overarching and supreme standards.

[ANNEE]

Suggesting a 3rd term violates the 22nd amendment you can't deny that 

He’s just doing that to annoy his non-supporters. 

Didn’t you know?

He doesn’t really mean it.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

An executive order against a constitutional amendment. I agree we need to address birthright citizenship, but a President making an executive order against a constitutional amendments shouldn't last 15 minutes. It's a bad precedence.

FISA

Blanket tariffs on every country. This has proven to be illegal. President has a scope for national security, and that's so that we can be nimble as foreign policy happens fast. But going against all nations shouldn't be decided by one person.

Going after people, citizens or not, for speech against another nation that we don't have any formal treaties with.

Allowing private AI companies to go into our files at the federal government.

Those are the ones I can think off the top of my head.

I don't see how keeping already unequal tariffs is illegal

Hell we should probably completely flip the tariffs or just why not make it 50/50

Since when is 50/50 not fair

[CriticalStinker]

I don't see how keeping already unequal tariffs is illegal

Those weren’t all “reciprocal”. We put tariffs higher for many countries citing their VAT tax which is sales tax or barriers to entry like regulation which we do too with vehicles and food.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

Those weren’t all “reciprocal”. We put tariffs higher for many countries citing their VAT tax which is sales tax or barriers to entry like regulation which we do too with vehicles and food.

Why not 50/50

[DBCowboy]

The US Constitution is not comprehensive enough, nor well written and unambiguous.

I would suggest that legal frameworks should be built on the most robust of the most universally agreed 'human rights documents' as their primary, overarching and supreme standards.

The US Constitution is very well written and the Bill of Rights adds to it.