Trump says he bombed Iran

[KrustyKrab]

Thank you for some clarification.

Strange the IDF idly watches & anctively enforces the harassment.

Still unsure if I get my propaganda from Haaretz, is it more or less legit?

Please advise.

And all along I thought it was CNN and MSNOW where you got your propaganda from.  Please advise

[KrustyKrab]

Thank you for some clarification.

Strange the IDF idly watches & anctively enforces the harassment.

Still unsure if I get my propaganda from Haaretz, is it more or less legit?

Please advise.

Didn’t they tell you?  They’re one of our closest allies doing ally stuff.

[SteamyAmerican]

And all along I thought it was CNN and MSNOW where you got your propaganda from.  Please advise

https://www.axios.com/2026/04/25/israel-...e-parscale

Neither? I don’t watch TV. And I don’t think any MSM cable network would touch the stuff I’ve unfortunately come across with a 10-foot pole. Lest they be sued or something. Plus I mean since folks like Bari Weiss have taken the helm, I doubt this stuff would make the light of day with or without journalists in Israel/Gaza.

It’s okay. Not your fault you assume things that are patently untrue. Won’t hold it against ya.

Shoot. You’d think with the victim card played all the time, Israel would want all the attention on Tel Aviv after Iran’s initial barrages. But maybe it’s a bad look to show your enemy/the world the damage inflicted. They sure don’t like to show the damage they inflict.

Anywho. I included the link to ask if this is good or bad propaganda.

Please advise.

[SteamyAmerican]

Didn’t they tell you?  They’re one of our closest allies doing ally stuff.

Haaretz exposing the settlers or the IDF backing the harassment?

And how is either beneficial to the U.S.? I mean I guess it do t matter as long as they get that sweet, sweet taxpayer $. Amirite?

[SteamyAmerican]

Fun fact. On the subject of why we are over there anyway. I mean of course besides needing to have this done for 47 years and all.

If the State Department came out yesterday and said Israel cajoled the WH and twisted some nips to drag us into this boondoggle, are they lying? Is Trump? Is Israel? Or is the narrative quickly dissolving? (see Axios article)

I mean sure, us Americans can be idiots. But sometimes the truth is what it is, and clear for all to see. So did our greatest ally get us to join or no? I mean I thought this whole thread was about how we completed the stated mission last summer…

Which is it?

[IDELB2006]

I do t speak Hebrew and I’m sure those women and children deserved to die.

The focus is more about the Iranian women and children. 

But even that support is conditional. Sometimes its also okay to wipe out a whole civilization.

[andy06shake]

[cherokeetroy]

Oh no

Look at all the Joos out in unison against their corrupt leader in charge

Joo haters, all of them

https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/204818...77333?s=20



Here's another one

https://x.com/OunkaOnX/status/2048363405665505546?s=20

[IDELB2006]

The CE O of Lockheed Martin sees a "Golden Opportunity" in the Trump administration. 

Speaking to investors on the company’s first-quarter 2026 earnings call Thursday, April 23, Taiclet did not attempt to be subtle about what the current political environment means for the world’s largest defense contractor.
 
With the Iran war driving Pentagon spending, a Trump administration that has requested a record $1.5 trillion defense budget, and a Defense Department leadership openly willing to restructure how it does business with contractors, Taiclet told investors the timing couldn’t be better.
“This is a golden opportunity right now based on who’s in government,” Taiclet said, citing “their experience, their willingness to change, the demand that they have for what we do and what our partners in our industry do.”

Not only that, but they negotiated a golden egg from the pentagon.

The most significant development from Taiclet’s earnings call wasn’t a contract announcement. It was a structural one.
 
Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon have been working toward what Taiclet described as a “more commercial-like business model for major weapons systems,” a departure from the traditional government contracting framework that has historically loaded risk onto defense manufacturers.
Under the new approach, the Pentagon has added a “recovery element” to its contracts with Lockheed Martin, according to The Motley Fool. If the government changes production rates or contract terms down the line, whether due to budget shifts, Congressional action, or strategic reprioritization, Lockheed Martin receives payment regardless.

It looks like free money for everyone. How much will this cost me?

Link

[KrustyKrab]

It’s okay. Not your fault you assume things that are patently untrue. Won’t hold it against ya.

Please elaborate on what I assume to be true that isn’t???  I’m pretty sure my post history is available to you.

kind of comical when you’re using extreme left AXIOS as a reference source