110 |
6,051 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:40 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: The swamp includes the press.
It includes the shills online.
Well, who owns the multimedia press?
Could it be a small number of multinational conglomerates and billionaire families...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
51 |
4,119 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:49 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Well, who owns the multimedia press?
Could it be a small number of multinational conglomerates and billionaire families...
Do you trust the BBC?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
110 |
6,051 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:50 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Do you trust the BBC?
LoL
Big guy, we have been through this before.
I don't trust anyone.
But without a modicum of such being extended, we would never get anything done.
The BBC were "Savile" shielders/enablers, so...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
6 |
1,423 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:46 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Trump or no Trump, I look to people tells facts, not "their truth" or their interpretations of facts.
That's a good way to go about it.
But one would think there would be some non paid shills out there that still believe in his message. If we're saying a lot of the media landscape have people with different agenda's, I 100% agree. Those agendas are sometimes as simple as the advertisers, that's a lot of their revenue. Makes you wonder why Lockheed Martin would have an ad on cable news when as individuals we can't really buy their product unless it's stock.
I imagine there are still some big name voices out there who still support Trump though. The one's I know of are pretty establishment and neocon though. I'm sure there are some indie folks, but it's honestly some older names I can think of.
I think MAGA has a higher esteem for Lindsey Graham than Massie right now. Which to me is pretty telling as to the base being neocon vs libertarian at the moment. Libertarian being more America first to me, though I'm bias.
3 |
1,107 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:09 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Here you go.
https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/...ouncements
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/insider-tra...iran-post/
https://www.theguardian.com/business/202...oil-prices
Just to point out.
They dont prove insider trading or Trump's direct involvement.
But questions are being asked...
That’s all speculation and you’re right there is no proof. I’ve a real hard time taking anything Warren has to say serious, she’s always wrong and always screaming the sky is falling. She’s a swamp creature who’s the biggest receiver of big pharm campaign donations. I don’t trust anything she says.
Im JS, anyone saying he’s enriching himself has zero proof he is, although they say it as though it’s fact, it’s not.
Trading when things like military actions are happening has been going on forever regardless of who’s at war. I’ve no doubt either that there’s insiders leaking information to investors, unfortunately that’s almost a given nowadays.
If people here are saying he’s enriching himself then I want proof, not speculation and hearsay.
Apparently I’m in cult now, someone here told me so.
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:32 PM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: Then perhaps the main government's of the world are in on it too at the expense of their people as they profit
There’s no profit if you’re energy dependent, as they currently are.
No boats heading there to fill up.
Very few boats heading there to drop off.
110 |
6,051 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:59 PM)KrustyKrab Wrote: That’s all speculation and you’re right there is no proof. I’ve a real hard time taking anything Warren has to say serious, she’s always wrong and always screaming the sky is falling. She’s a swamp creature who’s the biggest receiver of big pharm campaign donations. I don’t trust anything she says.
Im JS, anyone saying he’s enriching himself has zero proof he is, although they say it as though it’s fact, it’s not.
Trading when things like military actions are happening has been going on forever regardless of who’s at war. I’ve no doubt either that there’s insiders leaking information to investors, unfortunately that’s almost a given nowadays.
If people here are saying he’s enriching himself then I want proof, not speculation and hearsay.
You asked, and I endeavored to provide.
Courts will also want proof.
But the whispers are clearly in the wind...
The timing through, thats precious, possibly quite literally.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
37 |
1,247 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:59 PM)Vermilion Wrote: There’s no profit if you’re energy dependent, as they currently are.
No boats heading there to fill up.
Very few boats heading there to drop off.
I meant profit using American open market not profit directly from gas sales
51 |
4,119 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 06:53 PM)CriticalStinker Wrote: That's a good way to go about it.
But one would think there would be some non paid shills out there that still believe in his message. If we're saying a lot of the media landscape have people with different agenda's, I 100% agree. Those agendas are sometimes as simple as the advertisers, that's a lot of their revenue. Makes you wonder why Lockheed Martin would have an ad on cable news when as individuals we can't really buy their product unless it's stock.
I imagine there are still some big name voices out there who still support Trump though. The one's I know of are pretty establishment and neocon though. I'm sure there are some indie folks, but it's honestly some older names I can think of.
I think MAGA has a higher esteem for Lindsey Graham than Massie right now. Which to me is pretty telling as to the base being neocon vs libertarian at the moment. Libertarian being more America first to me, though I'm bias.
Graham is a leftist asshole who just mouths the sentiment.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
6 |
1,423 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-12-2026, 07:08 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Graham is a leftist asshole who just mouths the sentiment.
I think he certainly has more in common with the politicians on the left than he does with voters on the right.
He did get an endorsement though, Massie and Paul are not on the short list for Trump at the moment. I believe he will actively try and unseat Massie, who may be a unicorn of solid men in that ecosystem.
|