Trump 'authorizing Full Force, if necessary' as military deploys to another US city

[putnam6]

FWIW

https://x.com/gatewaypundit/status/1977141319454650705
JUST IN: Appeals Court Lifts Judge’s Order Blocking President Trump From Mobilizing National Guard Troops in Illinois



 

 

Whiplash347

@Whiplash437
·
21h


\BOOM. The Great Reclamation has begun.

The Supreme Court just restored Trump’s constitutional power to remove rogue commissioners from federal agencies. For the first time in ninety years, the President can clean house.

The walls of bureaucratic tyranny are cracking.

Since 1935, the presidency has been a hostage. A hidden ruling called Humphrey’s Executor v. United States created a shield around unelected bureaucrats buried inside so-called independent agencies. They could not be fired. Not by Congress. Not by the people. Not even by the Commander in Chief. These were the Deep State’s castles inside the government. Protected. Untouchable. Writing rules with the power of law while answering to no one. For decades, they dictated policy, destroyed accountability, and made every president a figurehead in his own house. That ended this week. In a ruling few expected but history will never forget, the Supreme Court confirmed that President Trump has full constitutional authority to remove Democratic commissioners Mary Boyle, Richard Trumka Jr, and Alexander Hoehn-Saric from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The Court reminded the nation that executive power belongs to the President alone. Not to agencies. Not to boards. Not to faceless lawyers. The 6-3 decision has detonated the foundation of bureaucratic immunity. Trump can now terminate any commissioner who obstructs reform, dismantle ideological mandates, and reclaim executive control over agencies that have operated like private empires. The ruling sets a precedent that can sweep through every corner of the federal maze — FTC, SEC, NLRB, CDC, FDA, DOE. Hundreds of unelected operators who hid behind the term “independent” are now exposed. The Consumer Product Safety Commission is only the beginning. Nearly 700 positions across Washington fall under the same model. With this judgment, Trump holds the legal weapon he was denied in his first term. The sword is back in his hands. Inside the Deep State, panic has already begun. For decades, they didn’t need to win elections. They only needed to control who stayed behind. By embedding loyal operatives inside untouchable posts, they guaranteed their agenda survived every presidency. They wrote laws under the cover of regulation. They censored industries through “safety standards.” They shifted policy without ever standing for a vote. That structure is now collapsing. This decision is not about staffing. It’s about sovereignty. The hidden coup that began ninety years ago has been reversed. The unelected state no longer outranks the elected one. The legal scaffolding that protected the regime is being dismantled piece by piece. That is why the media is silent. They understand what this means. If Trump uses this authority — and he will — the entire architecture of shadow governance will fall. Agencies that weaponized policy for ideology will be stripped of power. Mandates will be rescinded. Political infiltrators will be removed. The Deep State’s invisible army is finally within reach. Trump’s second term begins now, with the power he was denied in 2016. The presidency is no longer a cage. It is a command post. He can purge the administrative state, rebuild federal institutions that answer to the people, and restore a government that serves its citizens instead of its masters. This is The Great Reclamation. The end of ninety years of executive humiliation. The day the balance returns. The Deep State buried the presidency under red tape and called it democracy. But the chains have been cut. And Trump now holds the axe.

[putnam6]

• The post shares a flyer from Portland activists urging "laser tag" parties on October 11, 2025, to target federal helicopters with lasers, part of escalating anti-ICE protests that have included prior DHS arrests for similar strikes in September 2025.
  
• OHSU Hospital diverted medevac helicopters due to fears of laser assaults blinding pilots, a risk confirmed by cockpit footage showing green laser impacts and KATU reports on the dangers to aircraft personnel and public safety.
  
• Sortor's advocacy for National Guard intervention echoes federal concerns over Antifa tactics disrupting urban operations, amid broader 2025 Portland unrest involving firebombs and helicopter surveillance over ICE facilities.
  

[ANNEE]

FWIW

https://x.com/gatewaypundit/status/1977141319454650705
JUST IN: Appeals Court Lifts Judge’s Order Blocking President Trump From Mobilizing National Guard Troops in Illinois

This one's confusing.  So troops can stay -- but they can't do anything?
 

Appeals court rejects Trump request to deploy National Guard in Chicago area:  https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ap...ed-for-now 

Appeals court denies Trump administration request to halt judge’s ruling on National Guard pending appeal: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trum...00832.html 

Appeals court upholds ruling blocking Trump admin. from deploying National Guard in Illinois:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeal...ngNewsSerp





 

[UltraBudgie]

FWIW

"That ended this week. In a ruling few expected but history will never forget, the Supreme Court confirmed that President Trump has full constitutional authority to remove Democratic commissioners Mary Boyle, Richard Trumka Jr, and Alexander Hoehn-Saric from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The Court reminded the nation that executive power belongs to the President alone."

Um, no, not quite. That's jumping the gun. They did not overturn Humphrey's. That news is from over two months ago. Here is more info:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme...sc-members

It's similar to the NLRB decision back in May, where the Court said "because the Constitution vests the executive power in the President, he may remove without cause executive officers who exercise that power on his behalf, subject to narrow exceptions recognized by our precedents."

Those not-so-narrow "narrow exceptions" and precedents are still in place. However, the Court will hear arguments in December that may further erode or even overturn Humphrey's:

Trump has repeatedly blasted Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not moving fast enough to lower interest rates.

Critics say Humphrey’s Executor undermines the separation of powers by leaving powerful executive branch officials unaccountable to the president. Defenders say the Constitution gives Congress the flexibility to create agencies that rely on expert leadership and are insulated from political pressures.

The court said it will hear arguments in the case in early December.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has chipped away at Humphrey’s Executor in recent years. The Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the president could fire the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

More recently, the court let Trump at least temporarily remove members of the National Labor Relations Board, Merit Systems Protection Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The court on Monday separately said it won’t simultaneously take up the NLRB and MSPB cases.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-wee...mmissioner

More info on the motivation to overturn Humphrey's can be found in Project 2025:

One example includes potentially seeking the overruling of Humphrey's Executor v. United States. This case approved so-called independent agencies whose directors are not removable by the President at will. The Supreme Court has chipped away at Humphrey's Executor in cases like Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, but the precedent remains. The next conservative Administration should formally take the position that Humphrey's Executor violates the Constitution's separation of powers.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2...romise.pdf

I'm all for it. The Constitution clearly says where executive power shall be vested. It doesn't say Congress can build a wall around that power. Now, the question is, will Trump actually use that power, instead of just showboating with it? I'm talking purge. No, not a violent purge, leftists, like you guys salivate for, but a renewal of governance. Like Bill Clinton claimed he was doing when he fired every single Federal attorney back in 1993.

[putnam6]

Um, no, not quite. That's jumping the gun. 

Thats what I get for posting while watching football... 


So would you say this makes Trump's implementation of his agenda easier or more difficult? 

What else must Trump accomplish in the next two months to get back on schedule after year one?

Good thing that silly Israel/Gaza is winding down, he got lucky there, huh

[UltraBudgie]

I don't know I'm just watching the movie too and I do appreciate the opportunities to do something clear like court research rather than fuzzy like opinions haha, so that's on me, and Trump well I don't know because the left is acting like feral dog that is cornered and looking more like it will bite than lick hand and calm down so that has to be taken as it is I guess but cannot be allowed to run around peeing on everything and terrorizing people and right should do everything within the law to be sane but that can be a lot wow! I guess Gaza is up to Egypt now and I am too aware and have noticed pattern in hostilities sometimes I think they only pause to reload but hopeful and hopefully Trump will not decide hey lets start another war to keep weapons pipeline from stalling and will handle America first and I really think the Democrat party is going to crack they have bet on demographic and population shenanigans and that will be big issue I don't think they can hold together but it is still long ways to midterm and Trump's agenda is anything but clear although he is rolling things out fast and I think he needs to bring high tech manufacturing home and silicon valley to heel they are out of control and poisoning America minds and economy so research is needed what can be done legally.

[Sirius]

Do we have pictures of the protests in the thread somewhere?

[putnam6]

This one's confusing.  So troops can stay -- but they can't do anything?
 

I read it drunk and I read it hungover... sounds like all he can do is federalize them, but he can't deploy till it's appealed
to a district judge...

which is just a delaying tactic, if it's legal to federalize them, the only reason you federalize them is to deploy them.

Regardless looks like they have State and have fortified the ICE building for the interim

[DBCowboy]

A judge has ruled for the city (Chicago I think) to remove the fence surrounding the ICE facility.

[UltraBudgie]

Well okay then but this is also about crime and corrupt city government that perpetuates it and drugs and the whole violent Chicago rats nest of gangs and you can bet your boots the commieunity organizers in Chicago will not let this deescalate unfortunately they want their leftist agitprop and no one wants a please state but what needs done needs done and the law is on Trump's side so lets just get it over with because the Occupy Democrats spinmeisters will do their rabble rousing regardless.