The P. Diddy Trial

[GENERAL EYES]

Probably, but there's a small percentage that the videos implicate someone from the political realm, even Prince Harry...

Well, assuming the events went down as they're claiming they did, I hope he gets the book thrown at him.

I don't even know the guys music and very little about his celebrity status other than something something being mean to Beiber and something something "illuminati".

[BeTheGoddess]

Schiff or Schumer would be my guess, but since you brought up Harry, I would think that William would be bigger news given that he's next to the throne and did earlier on run with some of these types of people.

They wontbe able to touch Will, Kensington Palace will not let that happen, pufffy mayweild a lot of power and a better PR team, but the crown wont let them touch Prince Peggy.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

Please elaborate.

There is nothing 'innocent' about the diddler. 

The rabbit hole will presume, and go far DEEPER starting tomorrow. This will not be the Epstein Nothingburger. 

I guarantee that and will stake my name to it.

Pay attention and do your own research.

It's called sarcasm, you are way too serious. If he's proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt I'd be the first guy to light your torch man. He's accused of some dastardly deeds. Including murder. However, in America, people have a right to a fair trial. Don't you think so? One where they aren't presumed guilty until proven innocent? Im being half serious I think he's guilty too lol but at the same time as I read and watch the witch hunts I feel bad about how mass media has it would seem sometimes almost ruin the justice system. How can you be judged fairly by a jury if the word in everyone's mouth is burn him before even opening statements? It feels wrong. Also, in reference to research, as far as I know no evidence has been leaked so how can one research the evidence that only exists in the hands of op sec and prosecution. It's just repeated slander and isn't the world shitty enough without it? What if we called you a diddler without evidence lol

I'm just bustin your balls but you get my point. I love ya

[guyfriday]

They wontbe able to touch Will, Kensington Palace will not let that happen, pufffy mayweild a lot of power and a better PR team, but the crown wont let them touch Prince Peggy.

Oh I agree with that notion, but what or how will the palace react if a video of William comes out that has him and Combs "doing things". The King will have to remove William from the royal family like they did to Andrew. If he doesn't I sure the whole Jimmy Saville and Charlies hanging out will come out in the public over there. 


Again my bet is on Schiff being the political type that will get brought up. He isn't liked, not that important to the party, and he is in essence a throw away person in the scheme of things. Obama not so much, same goes for Schumer.

[quintessentone]

Per Friday’s news: 

1. Witness 3 is MIA (did the diddler get to her?)

2. prosecution has a new witness, witness 5 (HOW THE HELL ARE THERE ONLY 5 WITNESSES IN THIS SHIT)

4. juror selection finalization delayed until tomorrow morning. 

5. Opening statements tomorrow afternoon (this should be GOOOOOD)

[Video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MEvHzx-nal...B2ZXJzaW9u]

You: "How the hell are there only 5 witnesses in this shit?"
 

---

I am thinking because of blackmail and/or threats to their life, career etc. But also it may be shame, loss of self-esteem and confidence, trauma (just want to push it down into the subconscious to forget whole thing and move on), trauma bonding, and/or other complex psychological abuser/abusee relationships/codependencies, etc.

That's why I want to see expert mental health professionals explain to everyone how abusers manipulate and continue to manipulate and destabilize the victims.

Mix all of that with powerful drugs that render you incapable of consenting to that which you wound never have consented to (even after consenting to regular sex acts, as in the case of paid sex workers) or having any power or control, then it is evil.

[KKLoco]

Opening statements have begun. Here is one of them from the prosecution:

The prosecution says Casandra Ventura agreed to participate in a freak-off initially because she loved Combs. But, Johnson says, “she knew it was not something she wanted to do.” Johnson describes one freak-off in which Ventura “felt like she was choking” when Combs “made an escort urinate into her mouth.”

My GAWD this man is sick!

Here is a breakdown of court happenings:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/05/12/...iddy-trial

[UltraBudgie]

My GAWD this man is sick!

i've mentioned before the danger of conflating the prurient and the illegal, and i'll mention it again. the public spectacle of tearing down the iconic. it always backfires, in some way. there are no righteous mobs.

this is occultly weaponized, perhaps, by those who would control and have centuries of experience at doing so. they need the public to take the hatebait.

that said i do not like anything that i have heard regarding mr combs behaviour.

[quintessentone]

Opening statements have begun. Here is one of them from the prosecution:

The prosecution says Casandra Ventura agreed to participate in a freak-off initially because she loved Combs. But, Johnson says, “she knew it was not something she wanted to do.” Johnson describes one freak-off in which Ventura “felt like she was choking” when Combs “made an escort urinate into her mouth.”

My GAWD this man is sick!

Here is a breakdown of court happenings:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/05/12/...iddy-trial

Well her testimony needs the escort's testimony too, doesn't it, or it's she said, he said? Unless they have video tapes of the act which proves it took place, for one, for another I don't think that it will prove sexual coercion or being forced or being trafficked.

It's complicated, because we have a tape of Diddy beating up Cassie, which may or may not imply her being forced or coerced into sex acts/trafficking, rather may imply a domestic violence scenario, which Diddy is not being charged. Will the prosecution put two and two together some way to sway the jury in what is beyond reasonable doubt? That is the key here "beyond a reasonable doubt". Did Cassie seek counselling after she broke from him?

I am beginning to think that without multiple victims/witnesses coming forward with testimony as to the exact same forced/coerced sex trafficking instance that the charges below may not stick. They need to prove coercion, being forced for the sex trafficking charge to stick. There are many more charges, but I think the prosecution is starting with the charges below.

"Prosecutors have charged Combs with racketeering, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transportation for prostitution purposes. The charges stem from allegations made by four unnamed people."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...48041.html

[BeTheGoddess]

Valid media,:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csm6jilQwcw

[sahgwa]

Per Friday’s news: 

1. Witness 3 is MIA (did the diddler get to her?)

2. prosecution has a new witness, witness 5 (HOW THE HELL ARE THERE ONLY 5 WITNESSES IN THIS SHIT)

4. juror selection finalization delayed until tomorrow morning. 

5. Opening statements tomorrow afternoon (this should be GOOOOOD)

[Video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MEvHzx-nal...B2ZXJzaW9u]

Is the Biebs going to testify? 
Isn't he a victim , allegedly?