306 |
6,480 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-25-2025, 11:33 AM)LSU2018 Wrote: I figured as much. Youtubers and other social media "influencers" seem more excited in finding new things to share while documentaries like the ones they give us today seem to find existing info and parrot those same findings.
Remember how the COVID narrative had to be pounded into our collective consciousness, over and over, before TPTB went to the next step of lockdowns, work from home, mandatory vaccinations, etc.
We don't have enough people who believe in the possibility, and those who do believe, a good portion think they will be benevolent and our mentors.
If there's a real NHI, they likely couldn't care less about humanity.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 08:07 PM)putnam6 Wrote: ...
If there's a real NHI, they likely couldn't care less about humanity.
I still struggle to imagine a scenario where they might 'want' to engage humanity...
I can't seem to imagine "why?"
What would they consider that makes it "worth it."
I mean, we're stilling killing each other over entirely made-up shit.
45 |
1,738 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

What is the bottom line? Did ANYbody see the "disclosure"? If so, what did it mean?
I dispise the media treatment of these things.
"Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always". - Darielys Tejera/Spc. Douglas Jay Green/Robin Williams
"Pseudoscience, depending for its “truth” on consensus, is deeply hostile to challenge." - Rael Jean Isaac
306 |
6,480 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 08:35 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I still struggle to imagine a scenario where they might 'want' to engage humanity...
I can't seem to imagine "why?"
What would they consider that makes it "worth it."
I mean, we're stilling killing each other over entirely made-up shit.
Here's how I look at it, we don't live long enough...
Conventional logic suggests their life cycle is so much longer... they are tortoises and we are fruit flies
On one visit, they meet Adolph Hitler, and the next time it's Eisenhower, then Kennedy, and now Orange Hitler if they read MSM
We are likely the Alabama trailer park of the universe or dimension.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
1 |
274 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 08:07 PM)putnam6 Wrote: We don't have enough people who believe in the possibility, and those who do believe, a good portion think they will be benevolent and our mentors.
nice take!
like who and how many would pay any attention to disclosure?
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Does it mean anything that we humans most often conjecture that
...we, ourselves, must be 'amusing,' at least... pathetic, at worst...
OR just food for the gods?
306 |
6,480 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 09:14 PM)Darkorange Wrote: nice take!
like who and how many would pay any attention to disclosure?
Exactly, even the subset that is paying attention and semi-plugged in is still skeptical of how much we can trust our government.
Till we get over 70-80% believing in the possibility of NHI and the honesty of our government.
Why Disclose and beat your head against the skeptic's wall?
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
306 |
6,480 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 09:17 PM)Maxmars Wrote: Does it mean anything that we humans most often conjecture that
...we, ourselves, must be 'amusing,' at least... pathetic, at worst...
OR just food for the gods?
I mean if real, if we were a threat, wouldnt they have taken us out by now?
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
4 |
155 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

We most likely won't be seen as "food" to any visitors: completely separate evolution on a far distant planet, resulting in a completely different biology, based on completely different DNA.
And that is assuming that "They" even have something analogous to our DNA.
Very unlikely that we would be even edible to them. We could even be "poisonous", or at least, noxious.
Furthermore, if, by some remote chance their foodstuffs in some way resemble our meaty bodies, they will have undoubtedly developed the means to provide for themselves, or their long journey from their homes to ours would have been a very hungry one.
And they would not have known we were nutritionally suitable when they first left home.
So why come to Earth?
We appearto be sentient, even if we often do not seem very intelligent. And where there is Sentience there is culture, and insights from a new perspective.
Sentience maybe be a rare enough occurrence in the Universe to make such a trip worthwhile.
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-05-2025, 11:42 PM)Mantiss2021 Wrote: We most likely won't be seen as "food" to any visitors: completely separate evolution on a far distant planet, resulting in a completely different biology, based on completely different DNA. ...
And they would not have known we were nutritionally suitable when they first left home.
So why come to Earth?
We appearto be sentient, even if we often do not seem very intelligent. And where there is Sentience there is culture, and insights from a new perspective.
Sentience maybe be a rare enough occurrence in the Universe to make such a trip worthwhile.
I agree completely... But I sort of meant "food" to include any manner of 'consumption'... in the sense of 'exploitation.'
Nevertheless, you might have something there about the potential benefits of seeking out sentience, at least as a curiosity,
but I wonder that such never seems to be the DOD approach to the whole affair...
there is never a mention of 'they might want to talk to us" only
"look how badass there tech is... danger!...
give us money so we can save you from this mystery demon in the sky."
The few who do seem to call for a non-military approach... often appear lost in a vision of their own.
"Marketing" their special knowledge, rather than sharing it.
|