06-16-2024, 01:12 PM
This post was last modified 06-16-2024, 01:12 PM by Maxmars.
Edit Reason: spelling
 
I have brought this up in other threads, so please don't attribute this to a bias for or against anyone's arguments.
We have reached a point where the discussion is circling nearer and nearer to a core of assertions similar to "You said - you said." This is an indicator to me, at least, that the topic is worn down to attention on the posters, not the topic. It seems a natural occurrence in many threads, and no one is faulted by this development.
I am wondering if this thread has 'run it's course'... this doesn't meant the topic is "finished," only that without a reorientation of premises... a new "central question" or a different framework of argument can any meaningful dialogue be experienced.
Perhaps a new thread is in order here, one where the central question isn't about the propriety or justification for a certain school's response to the events reported.
This is just a suggestion.
We have reached a point where the discussion is circling nearer and nearer to a core of assertions similar to "You said - you said." This is an indicator to me, at least, that the topic is worn down to attention on the posters, not the topic. It seems a natural occurrence in many threads, and no one is faulted by this development.
I am wondering if this thread has 'run it's course'... this doesn't meant the topic is "finished," only that without a reorientation of premises... a new "central question" or a different framework of argument can any meaningful dialogue be experienced.
Perhaps a new thread is in order here, one where the central question isn't about the propriety or justification for a certain school's response to the events reported.
This is just a suggestion.