Synchronicities

[Sirius]

Clearly, right?

That really does work for me, and it's actually better if what works for me is rejected by others. It keeps it more original..

Plus, if you never see things as signs that have greater meaning, you never get exploited by your own wishful thinking or any false causal connections you made.

It saves you from being disappointed your special center-of-the-universe ship never arrives to sail you away on your day of special significance.

I've learned not to be so hard on myself about not being overly receptive to solipsistic esoterism.

[Video: https://youtu.be/VTFG6wtMWJM?si=Y0_MWNr49a5QnAmq]

Seeing through the illusions is the purpose and the test. It's like martial arts, you get humbled every week, good for the soul. What you describe sounds like rigorously holding on to ideals. I can understand drawing lines, but extending the minds fortress to cover the whole universe is like placing yourself in prison.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding. The "rational" explanation is to keep you moving, sometimes it works as barrier so that you can refocus or keep it. Yes probabilities exist, so does the arts. Art and science was never meant to be mutually exclusive to each other. Science without art turns you into Igor.

[Compendium]

Clearly, right?

That really does work for me, and it's actually better if what works for me is rejected by others. It keeps it more original..

Plus, if you never see things as personal signs that have greater meaning for only you, you never get exploited by your own fantastic thinking or any false causal connections you made.

It saves you from being disappointed your special center-of-the-universe ship never arrives to sail you away on your day of special significance. Blessed are the mindfully ignorant, for they don't even realize they've made blunders.

I've learned not to be so hard on myself about not being overly receptive to solipsistic esoterism.

[Video: https://youtu.be/VTFG6wtMWJM?si=Y0_MWNr49a5QnAmq]

Solipsism is a linear-minded misunderstanding of the esoteric philosophies

The mysteries provides an understanding that all things must be equated as being relative to a definable source, which is self

This is what is referred to in Illumination as "the primary truth"

The only truth that can ever be known with certainty, that you exist

Everything beyond this is open to debate and need be considered as, at best, "relative truth"

However ...

All that is relative, that one reflects upon is, is as one with the externalised projection of what defines that one and the primary truth

Without which, there would be/could be nothing to consider within the source, as one

Therefore, it is at all times to be considered as important and "true" as the self

This extends to an understanding that the world around you is the externalised projection of your internal body

This is not something that is merely philosophical. There is a very clear definable structure to it

Illuminated initiates can tell you exactly which planet aligns to which part and function within the body

Which land masses align with which body parts

We are taught exactly what we are, relative to the Earth

As such, we understand that the phase of the individual is no different to the phase relationship of cells within the body, or stars within the cosmos

We don't see ourselves as the centre of the universe, we see ourselves as an expression of the source of all creation

Indivisible from birth

To see ourselves as the centre of the universe, would mean that we see them as separate things

Again, this is the linear understanding of those who cannot see past that which sees

Which ironically, is more solipsism in perspective ability, than those that adopt such a philosophy

The reason that important aspects of the mystery teachings on the primary truth have been dropped within the linear philosophies like solipsism, is because they raise serious considerations within the common understanding of "God" that cannot be theologically answered

The same reason that "Gnosticism" has been misrepresented as "coming after" Judaism and Catholicism, when it is actually the the source material from the past Aeons. The Old Testament (Taurus/Torah/Bull, Aries/Ram) and New Testament (Pisces/Fish/Fisherman)

It is impossible for the works of through (Thor/Thoth/Theos) to come forth, without there first being someone who possesses and understands thought to produce them

Which is why the authors and original sources of the mistranslated Biblical texts are never offered

The purpose of our existence in this world is to seek the mysteries. To peer beyond the veil. To venture forth into the darkeness to bring forth light

To push beyond is the nature of creation

To forsake this is the nature of decay, and is to deny the entire purpose of the human being experiment

The alignment is real

It is painful, it is beautiful

To deny or ignore it, is just sad

It's like being offered the most amazing puzzle ever conceived and you instead choose just to keep it boxed

Also, "uni-verse" by definition is to be versed of the one

"Of the source"

Whenever we use the word "Universe" we are speaking of an individual conscious world perception

When we speak of a comparable collective consciousness, we use the word "Cosmos"

As with "conscious" being the individual
And "consciousness" being the collective of all conscious

These things are indivisible from "Universe" and "Cosmos"

We are merely reflecting in terminology on our external body and self

If we cut into our flesh and muscle, this is no different to sending a probe to Mars

Mars is our flesh and muscle

We just perceive it in a different dimension externally

Without alignments like this there would be no equilibrium (El'ohim) and nothing would, or could exist

If you choose to deny or ignore such alignments exist, that is your free choice in this world

But you would not be here to make such choices without them

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Don't read too much into my phrasing please. 

it's a way of saying the religious actions I apply to myself can't give themself too much worldly significance. As self-absorbed as I am it still doesn't extend to "the signs that lead in all directions."

Like I can't get the uplifting Ecclesiastical text at 11:11 right as The Time of Season plays on Pandora and 3 white seagulls fly past my window. Or then dissect the numerological spiritual meaning of that, and put that into an "enlightened" understanding of the world. 

I dont think it works that way. 

That's the solipsism I cant do. That I'm so special, and life is so deterministic, that it all lines up to make sure I see the trinity seagulls fly past my window as I read a somewhat related text. 

It was timed out coincidentally, but given the possibilities in life, things like that are bound to happen anyway. And keep happening because there is no way of stopping these chaotic lines of causation from appearing to line up occassionally. Statistically speaking..

I differ from others. Where most people see a massive intertwined web of the conscious godhead and things happening for a reason, I just see a closed system running on a few key lines of base code that just sort of takes care of itself. 

Then billions of years later, all across the universe, some similar base command for organic life to also increase in complexity built up an untold number of biospheres of evolution-bound life. Life that developed neurons, and these neurons recieved electrical signals from evolved sensory organs, which then helped them navigate through the ambivalent universe.

[Maxmars]

Everything was fine until they started noting the edits. After that it became a point of discomfort and window toward my pathology, that was likely made worse by drawing attention to it.

It has even now forced posts to explain away that discomfort. I'm sure it is some psychological need to completely control the context and way the comment presents itself that leads to the... well... batshit insane endless redaction.

After a certain point, on certain posts, it becomes closer to an oil painting, rather than a social media post. Colorful phrasing is art and sometimes Dr. Gonzo advises the art to take more adrenochrome. It's just that I'm too ADD to do all the fixes before I display the piece. And then that combines with comorbid OCD.

That said, I'd imagine it's tiresome for others, and for that I apologize.

I'm late in responding, but kept returning to this post in my mind...

I'm no professional in such matters, but I found it beautifully rendered.
A description of an all-too-relatable experience of all who are actually trying
to have a conversation... thank you for pushing through the headwind.

[UltraBudgie]

And applause to the staff for, apparently, looking at that "feature" and quietly removing it.

[Sirius]

I' late in responding, but kept returning to this post in my mind...

I'm no professional in such matters, but I found it beautifully rendered.
A description of an all-too-relatable experience of all who are actually trying
to have a conversation... thank you for pushing through the headwind.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmi...plause.gif]

90% of the time I have no idea what you are saying. just putting it out there.

[Maxmars]

@Sirius

I don't like to revisit such posts, I will offer an apology.

How I write appears particular to me... you are far from alone
in the sentiment you expressed...
feel free to ignore me... it's all good!

An explanation:  

I appreciate IP's writing style... I find it very engaging.

[Sirius]

@Sirius

I don't like to revisit such posts, I will offer an apology.

How I write appears particular to me... you are far from alone
in the sentiment you expressed...
feel free to ignore me... it's all good!

An explanation:  

I appreciate IP's writing style... I find it very engaging.

I enjoy reading your posts. I was just saying because it's my thread and I wasn't sure if you where just talking to IP.

I love your posts, even the ones I don't understand. Love IP's also.

[midicon]

 

Is the moment of 'conception' i.e., fertilisation the same as the 'big bang'?

[Compendium]

Is the moment of 'conception' i.e., fertilisation the same as the 'big bang'?

Exactly

It's the same concept as the "unbroken chain"

Everyone and everything living today, has a direct unbroken lineage back to the very source of all things, within the dawn of creation

If they didn't they would not/could not be here

If even one link was broken, you wouldn't exist 

It is something very simple when it is said like this, but it something that most people never even consider

In my tradition this is the intended understanding behind the dimensions/degrees that are commonly refer to in other tradition as "the Rose Croix (Rosicrucian)"

15th - Time coming to you (East)
16th - Time passing from you (West)
17th - Bloodline passing to you (North)
18th - Bloodline passing from you (South)

The idea is to give you an understanding that the flow of time, from the very start of creation itself, passes not only around you, but also through you (as external, so internal. As above, so below)

You are merely a point in focus within the internal cycles (Isis/Resonance/Jesus) and external cycles (Osiris/Oscillation/Christ)

You are not the only focus, granted. But you are no less the sum of creation, than the creation itself you look upon

It is you, you are it. If it were not this way neither of you would exist

The world would not exist without us
We would not exist without the world

This same concept extends to concepts like God, which is the the Church is terrified of things like Gnosticism and the mystery teachings

Because this was part of the original understanding offered within the mystery schools, that all the Churches are based upon, that was the origin of Judaism and the Catholic Churches, called "Gnosticism"

Though the common perception of what Gnosticism was, and is, has become grossly misrepresented

As with the various mythologies, there was no real conception of "Gods" in the sense that we perceive such things today

Such is concept of modern history. Which is consistently adopted and then abandoned throughout the history and cycle of the ages

With the original teachings doing their best to correct the corrupted teachings each time they come within the cycles

While the corrupted teachings do their best to erase and suppress the original teachings each time they come within the cycles

Within the original teachings there was only personification of concepts and ideals on who we could become

If you were said to be like Thoth, you were thoughtful

If you were said to be like Loki, you were logical

If you were said to be like Freya, you would nurture and feed

What frightens modern theologies so much about the original mystery schools teachings, is that they cannot be divided by any form of theology or ordered divinity, from understandings like we today refer to as science

The conceptualised Elohim (Equilibrium) "God", is indeed one in the same as concepts like the "big bang"

If people are to realise that "the source" defined by deterministic will and belief as "God" and scientific concepts like "the big bang" are actually the same thing?

They may find common ground in which they realise that they no longer need to be told what God is

They no longer need to be "saved". They are perfectly capable of saving themselves. Or at least seeking to walk the path they need walk themselves

They may find common ground and realise that the things which have actually kept us divided in this world, are very same as those that claim to bring us together through their subjective exclusivity

Imagine a group of old men, all sitting around arguing over who should drive a bus, when none of them know how to drive. Or even what a bus is. Or even have any idea where we are even going

This is religion today

It is faster to get out and walk "the long walk" yourself, because that bus is never going anywhere

It is a perpetual promise of something offered, which cannot actually be offered to you. Because it is, and always was yours, inherent from birth

In my tradition we say "Beware those who would try sell you the keys to your own kingdom"

Such as the keys on the Vatican logo

That bus is going nowhere. At least while they sit around waiting for each other to die, so they can implement another driver who will do and offer just as little as the last

At the same time that science and other understandings evolve forwards at a rate of development that is undeniable and cannot be matched by the Church

Forwards to what? The very same source that the Church claims to represent and be an indisputable authority on

Don't get my wrong, the Church and it's leaders are not inherently bad. Just blind

Intentionally blind and deaf, by choice

Some of the interactions I have had with them, their Bishops and Vicar Generals about the corruption of the original teachings is borderline evil

I don't believe in true evil. Only perceived evil and evil actions...

But the men I've spoken to in the Church are as close to evil as I have ever seen in this world

When you confront them with a deeper understanding of their own texts than they can offer, they instantly turn dark and evil

I have literally watched something take them over to respond to me, from outside of them, which is not them

Something dark and smug, bathed in a horrible false light that felt sick

Here in my home town, they have their Diocese offices intentionally located in the botanical gardens, at the same time that their Vicar General laughs and says "What mother?", when I ask him about restoring the feminine balance of "God"

Ive never wanted to punch someone in the face more than I did in that moment

It's like someone sitting in a pool, saying "what water?" because they don't want to admit it exists, or they might have to share it. Or worse, lose it

They present themselves to be the keeper of the keys, when in actual fact they are little more than a blockage

There are people commenting on this thread that are a perfect example of this

They believe they can define and name a concept like God, when they don't even understand themselves yet

Worse, they intentionally forsake any alignment or understanding of/towards self, or the mysteries as "chaos" at the same time they have convinced themselves they understand the source of such chaos

That's like claiming to understand the source code for a computer language, at the same time you say that no code or pattern exists within the very software you are using

Software you claim to have written

You cannot possibly claim to know the source in any way that you could name them with familiarities like "God", whilst you also deny or ignore the workings of such God as unknowable

The crazy part is, they are taught this within their own teachings

"If you do not know the son, you do not know the Father"

"None can know the name of God"

Anyways, the point is, yes, it is the big bang. But it is no different to the source of creation and thought (Theos) within equilibrium (El'ohim) that people call "God"

The irony is that the people who claim to know God the most, are usually those who have the least understanding of their alignment to such a source

They are those who are the most disconnected

If you were to ask them how far back their bloodline goes, they would answer something along the lines of their great-grandparents, or a particular generation

Because they are blind to the fact they are undeniably one with the source, by the fact they are even here

They detach themselves from such understanding, instead looking to find the same familiarity in one named and defined "son of God"

Without ever realising they are defining something within themselves

As such, they are blind to everything that goes with it

So they need someone to tell them how to think. How to feel. How to love

So instead of seeing patterns that can be learned and defined towards the missing parts of themselves they seek, they see chaos, beyond their ability to understand 

Sadly, most will spend their entire lifetimes praying to an alignment of the internalised and externalised cycles (Jesus becoming Christ) hoping for it to be "returned" (in cycle) to them ...

But when they are shown pathways that lead to such alignment within the equilibrium, they disregard it as coincidence

The reality of it seems to be that they are more in love with the idea of knowing, than they are being offered a path of experience towards a genuine understanding of the things they seek

It is easier to disregard, deny or ignore things as impossible, non-existent and unknowable, than it is to consider or acknowledge a path that seems inconceivably hard to walk

It is better to deem it as impossible, for all but one person. Then simply ask to be saved by that person

To the point where they will try to reduce, belittle, shut down, or even case aspersions of evil on those who have actually walked a path that seems impossibly hard to them

Or (and this is an action of evil in my opinion) they attack those that seek such a path

I see it in forums like this all the time

Uninitiated users who will go out of their way to join a conversation on the topic they have no real knowledge about to be able to contribute on, just to say that they "think" or "believe" is it not real, impossible or doesn't exist

This is the equivalent of posting in a science thread, just to detail how little you know about science, or care for it, or that you believe it doesn't exist

"The alignments within those experiments are coincidence. There is no significance or meaning in them"

In my tradition we refer to these people as "Conciliatory"

They do not really want to know or understand anything, only to silence the question in their mind"

Which is what religion offers

But teaching people to stop asking the question, is not the same as answering it

It's pretty ironic that the uninitiated would go out of their way to post and promote a closed-minded opinion on what they do not believe, do not know, and do not understand, and don't want to know or understand, on threads like this, when the sites name is literally "Deny Ignorance"