104 |
5,969 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:18 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Which still has noting to do with..
How was the video that was supposed to be evidence end up getting posted and creating the viral mess instead of ending up with the police as evidence?
It is police evidence, hence the charge.
As to how, ask YouTube, because that's what tends to happen to videos that go viral.
So that's witness statements.
Video evidence.
Plus additional CCTV.
It's not looking good for her, you get that right?
Johnnie Cochran could not beat that evidence, even if he were still alive.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-01-2025, 05:22 AM
This post was last modified: 09-01-2025, 05:23 AM by Kurokage. 
(09-01-2025, 05:16 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Which has nothing to do with her being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Like I posted before.
And you can be charged with the same charge as the young girl if you are just caught carrying the hatchet. Without causing chaos. And the kitchen knife if you can’t prove you had a reason to carry it.
Is that a false statement.
She was seen 'brandishing' an offensive weapon (waving it around in a threatening manner) by a member of the public. The police attended the scene BECAUSE of a report of someone seen 'waving/brandishing/revealing' a weapon in a public place. She wasn't arrested and searched and THEN the police found the weapons.
But both of those situations could lead to being prosecuted for possession.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-01-2025, 05:30 AM
This post was last modified: 09-01-2025, 05:32 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
(09-01-2025, 05:22 AM)Kurokage Wrote: She was seen 'brandishing' an offensive weapon (waving it around in a threatening manner) by a member of the public. The police attended the scene BECAUSE of a report of someone seen 'waving/brandishing/revealing' a weapon in a public place. She wasn't arrested and searched and THEN the police found the weapons.
But both of those situations could lead to being prosecuted for possession.
She is being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Like I posted before.
And you can be charged with the same charge as the young girl if you are just caught carrying the hatchet. Without causing chaos. And the kitchen knife if you can’t prove you had a reason to carry it.
Is that a false statement.
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:22 AM)andy06shake Wrote: It is police evidence, hence the charge.
As to how, ask YouTube, because that's what tends to happen to videos that go viral.
So that's witness statements.
Video evidence.
Plus additional CCTV.
It's not looking good for her, you get that right?
Johnnie Cochran could not beat that evidence, even if he were still alive.
Which still has nothing to do with..
How was the video that was supposed to be evidence end up getting posted and creating the viral mess instead of ending up with the police as evidence?
104 |
5,969 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:30 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: She is being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Which has nothing to do with her being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Like I posted before.
And you can be charged with the same charge as the young girl if you are just caught carrying the hatchet. Without causing chaos. And the kitchen knife if you can’t prove you had a reason to carry it.
Is that a false statement.
"She is being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Which has nothing to do with her being charged with carrying an offensive weapon."
What???!!!!
I think you may find it does.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
104 |
5,969 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:31 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Which still has nothing to do with..
How was the video that was supposed to be evidence end up getting posted and creating the viral mess instead of ending up with the police as evidence?
You are simply babbling now.
The video is evidence.
Again, deal with the facts, and our rule of law, anything else is simply beside the point.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:31 AM)andy06shake Wrote: "She is being charged with carrying an offensive weapon.
Which has nothing to do with her being charged with carrying an offensive weapon."
What???!!!!
I think you may find it does.
Fixed it. You should be happy now.
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:33 AM)andy06shake Wrote: The video is evidence.
You assured everyone the man was following and filming the girls as evidence. And yet how does the video end up being posted online instead of being handed over to law enforcement. Where if the video was handed over and not posted online, there wouldn’t be this viral mess. It’s pretty simple.
104 |
5,969 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-01-2025, 05:33 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Fixed it. You should be happy now.
About as clear as mud.
Im beginning to ponder you're more upset about this whole mess than that wee lassie and her crew.
There £30,000 up in crowdfunding, so there is that.... LoL
What a world.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-01-2025, 05:39 AM
This post was last modified: 09-01-2025, 05:52 AM by Kurokage. 
(09-01-2025, 05:33 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Fixed it. You should be happy now.
Yes. The police are only charging her with possession. Because she was seen/recorded 'waving/brandishing' it with intent, they could of possibly charged her with other offenses. If this is a first offence matter, she's likely been charged with a 'lesser' crime.
Quote: The Offensive Weapons Act 1996 makes it illegal to carry a knife in a public place with intent to use it as a weapon. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 makes it illegal to use a knife to threaten or intimidate someone.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
|