Scottish Girl gonna' start a revolution!

[midicon]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1484312202...7S9Ucbxw6v

I found this video in a Google search because I was curious about something and it shows a little more than the ones ive seen recently posted. You can obviously watch it without a facebook account as Google crawled it. She definitely looks like the aggressor, threatening him at the end of the video too. She's looking in a pretty bad light. When I look at the man, I dont see a "gangster" I see a digital creator that I believe is listed on his social media platform. I see no affiliated markings of any kind on any photo and gangsters dont hold back they would of straight up knocked that kid out until she looked silly probably beat her pretty bad because they have no remorse and dont care. Thats what gangster is. Gangster tolerates no disrespect and its full throttle all the way every day. Gangster's also usually armed, like that girl, funny right?

He has a gun tattooed on the back of his neck. The girl is calling them kid bashers. I wonder why?

[ReturnofBroccoli]

He has a gun tattooed on the back of his neck. The girl is calling them kid bashers. I wonder why?

I havent seen that photo, maybe you could post it? Just so you know, i am unaware of any gang affiliations with gun tats on the back of the neck. I dont know every gang though but I know every North American one. Maybe look for bulgarian gang tattoos depicting it. The only thing ive seen on his neck is a cross. Maybe he's an ex member of the Spanish inquisition no one expects the Spanish inquisition

As for kid bashing i highly doubt he crippled some little girl in broad daylight and was simply let go. Law enforcement would 100% check for marks on those occasions. After securing the scene of course.

One more thing I just thought of, how do you know its a picture of him if youre looking at the back of his neck? I hope its a reputable source.

[Kurokage]

I havent seen that photo, maybe you could post it? Just so you know, i am unaware of any gang affiliations with gun tats on the back of the neck. I dont know every gang though but I know every North American one. Maybe look for bulgarian gang tattoos depicting it. The only thing ive seen on his neck is a cross. Maybe he's an ex member of the Spanish inquisition no one expects the Spanish inquisition

As for kid bashing i highly doubt he crippled some little girl in broad daylight and was simply let go. Law enforcement would 100% check for marks on those occasions. After securing the scene of course.

One more thing I just thought of, how do you know its a picture of him if youre looking at the back of his neck? I hope its a reputable source.

Like you my friend, I've tried several times to explain the incident, how the Police in the UK work, and like other members shown proof that it's illegal to go around brandishing an axe and knife in a public place. I, just like you have posted multiple links to news articles, and actual Police statements, but some members here appear stuck on the fact that because he's a brownish' male he must be the guilty one!!

[WallFlowerActive]

Like you my friend, I've tried several times to explain the incident, how the Police in the UK work, and like other members shown proof that it's illegal to go around brandishing an axe and knife in a public place. I, just like you have posted multiple links to news articles, and actual Police statements, but some members here appear stuck on the fact that because he's a brownish' male he must be the guilty one!!

Then how does a man following teenage girls filing them supposedly as evidence where the video ends up being posted by him instead as being handed over as evidence to the police showing the identity of the minors.  Where it looks like news outlets can’t give out the names of the minors, and are blurring the young girls identities in images.  Where if the guy that is supposed to be the victim would have handed the video to law enforcement to aid the investigation, and would have restrained himself from posting the video, the video would have never gone viral.


So weird.

[WallFlowerActive]

it's illegal to go around brandishing an axe and knife in a public place.

Actually, the charge against the girl is possessing an offensive weapon.  Which isn’t the same as  brandishing.  You can’t carry a hatchet for self defense.

There are three categories of offensive weapons:

1. Items that are made for the purpose of causing injury and have no other practical purpose in the normal world (and are offensive weapons per se) - 

• Examples are flick knives, daggers, knuckledusters , butterfly knives, sword sticks, truncheons , and bayonets.
  

2. Items that are adapted or altered in some way for the purpose of causing injury - 

• Examples are sharpened screwdrivers, smashing a bottle to make the broken end into a weapon for causing injury, or stout dowelling with Stanley blades in the end.
  

3. Items that are not specifically made or adapted to cause injury but are carried for that purpose - 

• Examples are a hammer, cricket ball, baseball bat, scissors, razor, a stone, pick axe handle etc.
  

Almost any item can be considered to be an offensive weapon if the person carrying the item intends to use it to cause injury.
Whether an item is an offensive weapon is a question of facts for a jury, based on the full facts of the case.

https://www.askthe.police.uk/faq/?id=0b4...dle%20etc.

[andy06shake]

She never actually used either of the items which is restrained.

You dont need to use the weapons for it to be assault, brandishing them is enough and that's the law.

What she did was illegal, racist, and deplorable. 

Hopefully, she receives the help she needs.

[andy06shake]

He has a gun tattooed on the back of his neck. The girl is calling them kid bashers. I wonder why?

So a gun tattoo doesn't make him a "kid basher", just makes him, young, dumb, and now covered in silly ink.

My mate has barbed wire tattooed to look like a chain around his neck, but it does not make him a fence. 

The man and his partner are Bulgarian immigrants of the legal sort. 

We're doing nothing wrong or against the law.

If in doubt, look at who got arrested when the police attended.

[andy06shake]

Actually, the charge against the girl is possessing an offensive weapon.  Which isn’t the same as  brandishing.  You can’t carry a hatchet for self defense.

Carrying an offensive weapon in public in the UK can carry a maximum sentence of 4 years.

But that's not going to happen.

She will have to attend a children's panel.

Where she will most likely receive a mere warning.

[WallFlowerActive]

 brandishing .

The law doesn’t say anything about “brandishing”.

The law she was charged with with is possessing an offensive weapon.  Where if law enforcement found out you carried an every day knife or a hatchet for selfdefense, you can be charge with possessing an offensive weapon.

[andy06shake]

The law doesn’t say anything about “brandishing”.

The law she was charged with with is possessing an offensive weapon.  Where if law enforcement found out you carried an every day knife or a hatchet for selfdefense, you can be charge with possessing an offensive weapon.

The video clearly shows her waving and displaying the weapons in an aggressive manner aka brandishing.