11 |
892 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

For some historical legal perspective to this mess, does a good job. From a legal perspective, the only grounds for the sweetheart deal by the prosecutors is a real and imminent lethal threat to the prosecutors and/or their families.
One thing that is coming out with Epstein is in how he did know how to network and host parties. I would not say everyone that interact with Epstein was a satanic, pedofile canniable, but as part of the click of hanging out with globetrotting billionaires, there is a demand for it.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

"HSBC and Barclays face $12bn lawsuit over Epstein-linked trust
The UK banks are among the defendants in a US legal claim concerning La Hougue, a defunct offshore trust business suspected of being involved in fraud"
Link
AI summary:
La Hougue Trustrefers to a notorious offshore trust company based in Jersey, involved in major financial investigations for allegedly facilitating tax evasion and fraud for wealthy clients, often through complex, secretive structures and questionable transactions with operations in jurisdictions like the British Virgin Islands and Panama.
The name also appears in connection with the Louisiana Hospital Association, a provider of healthcare insurance (cover operation)
The "Crown" Connection:
La Hougue operated in Jersey, which is a British Crown Dependency. It is a self-governing possession that answers directly to the British Crown.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Link
"In one of the biggest scandals to shake the Middle East, the name of Emirati diplomat Hind Al-Owais has emerged in the Jeffrey Epstein files, where she is allegedly linked to requests involving underage girls. Footage has resurfaced showing her delivering a lecture on the rights of young girls and how to protect them from sexual abuse—a stark and disturbing contrast that has sparked widespread outrage."
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Link
"So we now know that Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem sent Epstein the torture video, but did you know he became buddies with Peter Mandelson after Epstein introduced them and his company DP World was subsequently awarded enormous public contracts in the UK?
Bin Sulayem is CEO of Dubai-based ports giant DP World — a cargo container company responsible for many of the UK’s freeports.
When Mandelson was business secretary in 2009, Epstein helped bin Sulayem lobby for the London Gateway port project on the River Thames — a £1.8 billion DP World venture. It was described as the” UK’s largest inward investment infrastructure project”.
Epstein forwarded messages from bin Sulayem to Mandelson seeking government loan guarantees, investment, and backing for the project. Epstein provided Mandelson’s personal email address to bin Sulayem and offered advice/edits on communications.
The project ultimately went ahead and is run by DP World to this day. When Labour returned to power under Starmer, it expanded freeports and continued giving contracts to DP World, including one for The Hive — an amenities and innovation hub at London Gateway Logistics Park.
DP World was also given Ministry of Defence and NHS contracts, despite huge concerns regarding workers’ rights and human trafficking.
224 |
2,735 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(02-10-2026, 05:33 AM)Kwaka Wrote: On the other side, Hillary Clinton is only willing to testify in public, could be interesting...
Yes mate it's now being said that Clinton had a 'VIP pass' to Epstein island lol.
Reckon the Clinton's utter contempt for the rule of law speaks volumes.
Let's hope they both get put strictly under oath and directly interrogated with hardball questions about their obvious involvement with this sadistic child rapist (and possible serial.killer).
We all know that won't happen (and it will be a complete whitewash) but one can certainly hope.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(02-10-2026, 07:41 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Yes mate it's now being said that Clinton had a 'VIP pass' to Epstein island lol.
[Video: https://youtube.com/ArIotAF9qZ8]
Reckon the Clinton's utter contempt for the rule of law speaks volumes.
Let's hope they both get put strictly under oath and directly interrogated with hardball questions about their obvious involvement with this sadistic child rapist (and possible serial.killer).
We all know that won't happen (and it will be a complete whitewash) but one can certainly hope.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]
If all else fails
There's nothing like good, old fashioned vigilante justice...
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

When people ask why victims don't name names
Would you come out and publicly accuse a Sultan (or any powerful world leader for that matter) of trafficking, torture and rape?
"I know of two survivors who say they were trafficked by Epstein to this Sultan. These two survivors don't know each other, but their stories are similar. They will not go public because they are afraid."
Link
11 |
892 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

02-10-2026, 08:50 AM
This post was last modified: 02-10-2026, 09:28 AM by Kwaka. 
(02-10-2026, 07:32 AM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Footage has resurfaced showing her delivering a lecture on the rights of young girls and how to protect them from sexual abuse—a stark and disturbing contrast that has sparked widespread outrage."
She does have more of the pretty model look than taking advantage of the vulnerable. To hit the headlines at this time, most likely does know more than what the average person does. Listening to her advise as one trapped in it will be more of a heads up than most.
The disturbing contrast is deeper than this.
11 |
892 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(02-10-2026, 07:41 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Reckon the Clinton's utter contempt for the rule of law speaks volumes.
If Bill is candid about his time as president, he is protected under executive privileged. He killed, tortured and abused millions. Nothing congress can do about that.
Then will we get the first crack of disclosure and how the situation really is? They Live.
62 |
2,173 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

02-10-2026, 10:02 AM
This post was last modified: 02-10-2026, 10:02 AM by Kurokage. 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2026/02/09/massie-says-there-are-6-names-in-unredacted-epstein-files-that-would-likely-be-incriminated
Quote:Massie said what bothered him the most about his viewing was “the names of at least six men that have been redacted that are likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files.”
Khanna noted that despite the Justice Department confirming last week that members of Congress could read the unredacted Epstein files, “There's still a lot that's redacted.”
Massie did not provide the names of the individuals he and Khanna saw, but said one was a U.S. citizen and another was an authoritative figure in a foreign government, while Khanna noted one name belonged to a high-profile individual.
Massie said Attorney General Pam Bondi “needs to do a little more work” and that she could possibly make the names of the six men public.
Massie and Khanna reviewed files for two hours Monday.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/unredacted-eps...on-1777806
Quote:World
Unredacted Epstein Files Say Trump Never Banned Him From Mar-a-Lago Even After ConvictionDemocratic Rep. Jamie Raskin reveals unredacted Epstein files showing the financier remained at Mar-a-Lago after his 2008 sex crime conviction, contradicting Donald Trump's claims.Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin has revealed a bombshell email from the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files that appears to shatter Donald Trump's long-standing narrative.
The 2009 message suggests that despite Trump's public insistence he kicked Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club for being a 'creep', the convicted paedophile remained a guest at the Florida resort long after his first conviction.
Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told reporters on Monday, 9 February 2026, that the files show Epstein was neither barred nor asked to leave, directly challenging the White House version of events.
Raskin said the email, sent in 2009 from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, references communication involving Epstein's lawyers and Trump, raising fresh questions as Congress pushes the Department of Justice to release more of the sealed Epstein files.
From the first story, it certainly looks like the DOJ are trying to protect certain individuals by redacting their names, unless there are specific criminal investigations ongoing this certainly looks like a cover up.
And from the second story, it's now clear that Trump didn't kick Epstein from mar-a-largo when claims he did, but many people have been claiming that since Trump was connected to Epstein.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
|