Release All Files! - Part 1

[FlyersFan]

Twisting context again. 

I twisted nothing.
My statement stands factual.

They did not witness anything.
They only repeated what Carroll told them.
Carroll had no witnesses to the event.
She had no evidence.
She had no memory of it

[Oldcarpy2]

Innuendo, rumors and circumstantial evidence doesn't prove guilt.

Guilt by association doesn't work either.

Was Trump a rude and crude womanizer? By most accounts he was.

Trump's a world class asshole but to think he was guilty and his political enemies had all the evidence and didn’t use it is just ****ing stupid.

Do you have to be so sweary?  You may think it makes you look hard, but it's actually just juvenile.

Let's just have some full disclosure from what he claims is the most transparent Administration ever, like no one's ever seen before?

[ANNEE]

Jesus Christ. 

She didnt even remember the damn year it supposedly happened.

I don't remember the year I was raped either.

But you never forget.

[FlyersFan]

Let's just have some full disclosure from what he claims is the most transparent Administration ever, like no one's ever seen before?

agreed.

The massive number of blacked out pages isn't 'full disclosure'.

I can see redacting victims names and their faces ... but that's it.

[RazorV66]

Moving on. There are also two survivors who accuse Trump of raping them. What is needed now is corroborating records to place Trump at the location and timeframe for a jury to decide whether or not the data fits the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' and then to haul his ass off to prison.

​​​​​​​

Of course you are moving on because you have nothing.

And here you go with these supposed "survivors" again.

Your other Lib friend here already commented about being past the statute of limitations on the Carroll supposed rape, all this other stuff you are sure Trump has committed is way past that as well.

[quintessentone]

Of course you are moving on because you have nothing.

And here you go with these supposed "survivors" again.

Your other Lib friend here already commented about being past the statute of limitations on the Carroll supposed rape, all this other stuff you are sure Trump has committed is way past that as well.

If wanting to uncover child rapists within government and/or internationally, like in Israel government, or elsewhere is a liberal thing then count me in.

[quintessentone]

I twisted nothing.
My statement stands factual.

They did not witness anything.
They only repeated what Carroll told them.
Carroll had no witnesses to the event.
She had no evidence.
She had no memory of it

Yes you did. I never said they witnessed the assault. They are witnesses to Trump being there at that location at that specific timeframe. 

Between the two witnesses and her testimony, she had enough evidence. 

Trump is a convicted sexual abuser and felon and that seems to be okay with you guys.

Trump has a lot to hide, perhaps on the felon and fraud side of things with the Epstein files.

[FlyersFan]

They are witnesses to Trump being there at that location at that specific timeframe. 

They weren't there.
They aren't witnesses that can testify to that.
All they can say is 'Carroll said Trump did such and such'.
That's it. 
That's not a 'witness' and not proof.
They are just repeating what they were told.

I can make up a story about a rich guy in town.
I can tell two friends that he raped me.
Those friends then can tell people about it.
But that doesn't mean that the friends have proof of anything.
It is not collaborating evidence of a rape.
It's just people retelling a made up story.

[quintessentone]

They weren't there.
They aren't witnesses that can testify to that.
All they can say is 'Carroll said Trump did such and such'.
That's it. 
That's not a 'witness' and not proof.
They are just repeating what they were told.

I can make up a story about a rich guy in town.
I can tell two friends that he raped me.
Those friends then can tell people about it.
But that doesn't mean that the friends have proof of anything.
It is not collaborating evidence of a rape.
It's just people retelling a made up story.

Yes one of the witnesses was working there and remembered because it was an event type of thing there, so he remembered seeing Trump and seeing him in Carroll's area.

You really need to read the court transcript as I did. You don't know diddily squat.

[FlyersFan]

Trump is a convicted sexual abuser and felon and that seems to be okay with you guys.

"you guys"  

The Epstein files are a totally different subject than the Carrol fake rape allegations and the lawfare waged against Trump in New York that made him a 'convicted felon'.   

With the Epstein files he is acting like a man with something to hide.   We can't say he's guilty of anything because there has been no evidence or proof of that.   But his behavior on this doesn't read like an innocent person.   That's subjective and that's my opinion.

The Carroll conviction was absurd.   She's a nutjob and if anyone else had been charged it would have been dismissed.   And the 'convicted felon' NY lawfare against Trump was not evidence of guilt on his part, but was evidence of guilt on the part of the Democrats who invented a felony and went after him on purpose.

Two separate issues .... Epstein files and the Carroll/NY incidents.   The Carroll/NY incidents he was convicted because of 'get Trump' and not because of any justice at all.