Release All Files! - Part 1

[Oldcarpy2]

Name calling and insults is all you two have left and it's getting boring guys.

Indeed.  The same folk that ruined ATS.  Sad.

Release the files.  And have done with it.  Unless....

[andy06shake]

How.

Because the DOJ has a duty by law not to release child porn and has to protect victims identities.

If the legislation thought he was going to “hid” somehow then the Epstein law would have established DOJ oversight.  But this isn’t about actual accountability.  This is about political theatre with room for innuendo.

Off the top of my head, by attacking investigations, calling releases "hoaxes" and appointing a DOJ leadership he trusts.

Never mind the fact that he's obviously benefiting from the redactions by way of removing his name.

Suspicion comes from pattern and tone WallFlowerActive, simple as that. 

Again, he is building his own bonfire.

And then fanning the flames with the files he refuses to release or continues to have tampered with.

If it looks like a Duck, and quacks like one...

[WallFlowerActive]

You do realize Trump is already a convicted felon -- right?

Really.  When’s his finally hearing to invoked his conviction and punishment.  Where convicted felons have been found wrongly convicted.

[Vermilion]

You do realize Trump is already a convicted felon -- right?

Investigations into Epstein have been blocked at every turn.  This is way bigger than Trump.

But we can start with Guilt by Association -- and many said things straight from Trump's mouth.

Then there's the victims and witnesses.

Basically the "Cat's out of the Bag" and it's not going back in -- no matter how much effort from many directions are trying to stop it.

Guilt by association?
LoL

How incredibly Marxist of you.
Do you not live in the US where we have the 1st, 5th, and 14th amendments?
You should probably read over those again and stop pimping the removal of citizens rights.

[quintessentone]

You are as delusional as she is.

She made it all up after watching a Law & Order episode.

"Judge Clarifies That By Most Definitions—Besides the Legal One—Trump Raped E. Jean CarrollTrump "deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers," Judge Lewis A. Kaplan wrote, while denying the former president a new trial."
Judge Clarifies That By Most Definitions—Besides the Legal One—Trump Raped E. Jean Carroll

"“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’” Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”"

----

Then there is his late ex-wife where she said not only did he rape her but he pulled out her hair and physically hurt her in other ways too, now what would you call a guy who did that?

[cherokeetroy]

That sounds almost desperate.  Grasping at straws to support Trump.

With Trump's cognitive decline -- I doubt he knows what he's signing.

As far as RUSSIA -- Mueller has made it perfectly clear he does not exonerate Trump.

I'm grasping at straws to support Trump?

No, what I'm saying is Trump willingly, of his own volition, signed mandates into law that he must now abide by
No excuses

He can't claim Dems are trying to frame him (Like the Russian Collusion)

It doesn't matter if he's suffering cognitive decline
The Act was signed by his own hand
No Autopen

[Vermilion]

  I like the old “Trump is a unlikeable idiot” but somehow gets people over multiple jurisdictions for decades and gets redactors from leaking and doing his bidding without question with total loyalty to help him hide something.

It’s fascinating that some could get themselves to believe that.
Flat-earther-like indeed.

[RazorV66]

There was however, a civil jury of his peers that found him liable for sexual abuse.

As to no criminal trial, my understanding is that's down to the statute of limitations.

The threshold of guilt in a civil trial is way different than a criminal trial.

It was a money grab by a delusional woman that fantasized about rape on a daily basis.

[WallFlowerActive]

"Judge Clarifies

Still a civil suit with a much lower bar on achieving a verdict.  The only thing the case proves is the Jury was sympathetic.

[andy06shake]

The threshold of guilt in a civil trial is way different than a criminal trial.

It a as a money grab by a delusional woman that fantasized about rape on a daily basis.

Yeah, it's probably going to take some stronger soap to wash that one off...

If I'm honest, i don't think even a wire brush and Dettol could remove that stain. 

Again found liable for sexual assault by a jury of his peers, just a fact. 

But we digress.

This is more about covering up other people's historical sexual abuse crimes.