Release All Files! - Part 1

[Oldcarpy2]

Hello.  Sparky… Hello..

Hello.  Good to see one little boy still believes...Do keep up?

[Oldcarpy2]

What’s the proof that shows my cited source is wrong concerning redactions from civil suits vs the actual DOJ redactions.

Civil suits?

[chr0naut]

Carroll is a crackpot and a liar.
She couldn't remember key details of the so-called rape.
There was no evidence to support the claim
and her behavior afterwards was not that of someone supposedly raped.

The jury found him guilty because .... 'get Trump'.

She's now a rich liar.

I pity her cat. 
Poor thing going through life with a name like that.
The woman is a whack job.

Trump and his apologists call lots of people who appear quite sane, "whack jobs". Usually the delineator that prompts such outbursts is that Trump and his actions are brought into question.

Trump, on the other hand, has clearly demonstrated instances of narcissistic ideation, sociopathic tendencies, and frontotemporal dementia.

Carroll had a successful career in journalism and management which was anything but eccentric.

She and her defence team also presented a case, with considerable testimony, a plausible verified timeline and series of factual circumstances. Trump's defence, by comparison, was sloppy to non-existent and vacillated about his culpability.

... and he was found to have penetratively sexually assaulted her. He is a convicted rapist.

[FlyersFan]

Trump and his apologists ...

I'm not a Trump apologist.   I'm stating the truth.   Carroll provided no evidence, couldn't remember any of the details of the alleged rape, and did not act like a rape victim at all.   She's a total whackjob and a liar.   The jury found against Trump because .... 'get Trump'.    

Donald Trump is a bloviating piece of garbage, but that's not a good reason for people to find him guilty of crap that can't be proven.   Carroll obviously lied.

[UltraBudgie]

I'm not a Trump apologist.   I'm stating the truth.   Carroll provided no evidence, couldn't remember any of the details of the alleged rape, and did not act like a rape victim at all.   She's a total whackjob and a liar.   The jury found against Trump because .... 'get Trump'.    

Donald Trump is a bloviating piece of garbage, but that's not a good reason for people to find him guilty of crap that can't be proven.   Carroll obviously lied.

You are quite likely entirely correct, except that Vagina is objectively a funny name for a cat.

[FlyersFan]

You are quite likely entirely correct, except that Vagina is objectively a funny name for a cat.

  I can picture Carroll .... calling the cat so she can 'pet vagina'.  WHACKADOODLE.   

[chr0naut]

I'm not a Trump apologist.   I'm stating the truth.   Carroll provided no evidence, couldn't remember any of the details of the alleged rape, and did not act like a rape victim at all.   She's a total whackjob and a liar.   The jury found against Trump because .... 'get Trump'.    

Donald Trump is a bloviating piece of garbage, but that's not a good reason for people to find him guilty of crap that can't be proven.   Carroll obviously lied.

That is not the case that Carroll presented.

Please read the court documents that I linked in a previous post.

I find that the court documents provide a clearer view of things than press articles and opinion pieces.

[chr0naut]

  I can picture Carroll .... calling the cat so she can 'pet vagina'.  WHACKADOODLE.   

I once heard a stand-up comedian do a joke about calling his dog "Herpes". He said he'd call out "Heel Herpes, heel", but it would never heel.

Obviously he was insane.

[FlyersFan]

He said he'd call out "Heel Herpes, heel", but it would never heel.

"Vagina!  Vagina!   Where is my vagina?  Come, I want to pet you."

 

That poor cat!

[chr0naut]

"Vagina!  Vagina!   Where is my vagina?  Come, I want to pet you."

 

That poor cat!

So, you are suggesting that a cat would understand the inference?

They have a brain smaller than a tennis ball.