DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Release All Files! - Part 1
(12-21-2025, 09:26 AM)Kurokage Wrote: How many remember Joseph Schnitt's comments??
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/24...g-00666788

He was fired by Bondi not long after, it now look's like he was telling the undercover reporter the truth!



LoL
Some of you really will believe anything, as long as it lines up with your agenda.

Here’s what he really has to say….

“The comments I made were my own personal comments on what l've learned in the media and NOT from anything I've done at or learned via work. I have no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Ms. Maxwell other than what is reported in the news.” -Joseph Schnitt
(12-21-2025, 09:53 AM)Vermilion Wrote: There are many to blame.
Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, and the Prince did it to get their rocks off.
The girls did it for the money.
Each had their own reasons and they’re all degenerate.
Nobody was a hostage or had a gun to their head.
Framing those girls who happily, willingly and repeatedly pimped their friends out for money as “hostages” is a slap to face of the other girls who were true victims.
The girls have testified against each other.
They know who the willing participants in the sex trafficking are, and Virginia was the worst of the “victims”.

Trump knew what they were all doing and it also appears that he too got his rocks off as a survivor and another witness have stated and would testify to if they can just move this along to the courts and the people of the jury. The law is clear.

-----------

"Statutory rape laws are based on the premise that an individual is legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse until that person reaches a certain age. The law mandates that even if he or she willingly engages in sexual intercourse, the sex is not consensual.[sup][12][/sup]Another rationale comes from the fact that minors are generally economically, socially, and legally unequal to adults. By making it illegal for an adult to have sex with a minor, statutory rape laws aim to give the minor some protection against adults in a position of power over the youth.[sup][3][/sup]
 
Another argument presented in defence of statutory rape laws relates to the difficulty in prosecuting rape (against a victim of any age) in the courtroom. Because forced sexual intercourse with a minor is considered a particularly heinous form of rape, these laws relieve the prosecution of the burden to prove lack of consent. This makes conviction more frequent in cases involving minors.[sup][13]"[/sup]

Statutory rape - Wikipedia
"The only journey is the one within."
(12-21-2025, 09:53 AM)Vermilion Wrote: There are many to blame.
Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, and the Prince did it to get their rocks off.
The girls did it for the money.
Each had their own reasons and they’re all degenerate.
Nobody was a hostage or had a gun to their head.
Framing those girls who happily, willingly and repeatedly pimped their friends out for money as “hostages” is a slap to face of the other girls who were true victims.
The girls have testified against each other.
They know who the willing participants in the sex trafficking are, and Virginia was the worst of the “victims”.


I just think that's an odd take.

You have often argued Maxwell has done her time, and deserves to be in a cushy low security prison and even get out early.

But then you sound like you want more action taken against the underage girls who were involved in recruitment.

This may come as a surprise to some, but the justice system views adults and children differently. Children don't have the same understanding of the world, law, etc. That's why they're easier to manipulate from adults.
(12-21-2025, 09:53 AM)Vermilion Wrote: There are many to blame.
Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, and the Prince did it to get their rocks off.
The girls did it for the money.
Each had their own reasons and they’re all degenerate.
Nobody was a hostage or had a gun to their head.
Framing those girls who happily, willingly and repeatedly pimped their friends out for money as “hostages” is a slap to face of the other girls who were true victims.
The girls have testified against each other.
They know who the willing participants in the sex trafficking are, and Virginia was the worst of the “victims”.

Well, thats just victim-blaming dressed up as "nuance" and absolutely shameful.  

Minors cannot "do it for the money" in any meaningful moral or legal sense.

Groomers create compliance, not freedom.

And the absence of a gun does not equal the absence of coercion.

Additionally, victims testifying against each other says more about divide and control tactics than it does "degeneracy."

As to labeling some girls as "worse."

Again thats exactly how child sex predators redirect the scrutiny away from themselves.

All you will ever achieve by thinking that way is to enable their abuse.

Yuk.  Thumbdown
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(12-21-2025, 08:18 AM)LightAngel Wrote: It sounds like trauma bonding to me - it's a survival mechanism created by the brain under extreme stress.

It doesn't mean the victim liked the abuser.

It means the victim's brain was trying to survive.

FWIW I would’ve loved a few minutes with Epstein alone, guaranteed I’d be the only one walking out after what I’ve learned about him. He’s the worst kind of lowlife scumbag there is.  I also wasn’t trying to blame any of the victims but you said Vg was forced to recruit in what I took as a blanket statement that applied to all of them.  I was just pointing out that I’m not so sure that was the case (being forced) with all of them.  Hope that clears it up a bit.   

This topic hits home harder than you can imagine and for personal and family reasons I will not speak on it.
Apparently I’m in cult now, someone here told me so.  
(12-21-2025, 10:07 AM)CriticalStinker Wrote: I just think that's an odd take.

You have often argued Maxwell has done her time, and deserves to be in a cushy low security prison and even get out early.

But then you sound like you want more action taken against the underage girls who were involved in recruitment.

This may come as a surprise to some, but the justice system views adults and children differently. Children don't have the same understanding of the world, law, etc. That's why they're easier to manipulate from adults.



Your attempt to frame the facts I posted as an “odd take” is transparently desperate.
They’re just facts.
Proven, irrefutable facts.

Thanks for the random unrelated lesson about the justice system.
Here’s something you may not know.
Maxwell will do a minimum of 85% of her time, despite her valid appeal, in a low security club fed, and it was never going to be any different no matter who is president.
It’s what every rich nonviolent convict gets.
Epstein would have gotten the same if he were still hanging around.
(12-21-2025, 10:32 AM)Vermilion Wrote: Here’s something you may not know.
Maxwell will do a minimum of 85% of her time, despite her valid appeal, in a low security club fed, and it was never going to be any different no matter who is president.

How did she get there?

Who put her there and why?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(12-21-2025, 10:09 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Well, thats just victim-blaming dressed up as "nuance" and absolutely shameful.  

Minors cannot "do it for the money" in any meaningful moral or legal sense.

Groomers create compliance, not freedom.

And the absence of a gun does not equal the absence of coercion.

Additionally, victims testifying against each other says more about divide and control tactics than it does "degeneracy."

As to labeling some girls as "worse."

Again thats exactly how child sex predators redirect the scrutiny away from themselves.

All you will ever achieve by thinking that way is to enable their abuse.

Yuk.  Thumbdown



Virginia was working and trafficking for Epstein as an adult, in case you didn’t know.
Epstein paid her to go to Thailand for massage training when she was 19.

How many did Virginia recruit and traffic for Epstein over two years?
Is it easy for you to whitewash her and the other traffickers sick crimes?
I bet if she trafficked someone you knew, you’d change your tune.
(12-21-2025, 10:34 AM)andy06shake Wrote: How did she get there?

Who put her there and why?



It’s called a jury trial.
She was found guilty.
Do they not have those things on the island, matey?
Are those white wigs judge, jury, and executioner over there?
(12-21-2025, 10:45 AM)Vermilion Wrote: Virginia was working and trafficking for Epstein as an adult, in case you didn’t know.
Epstein paid her to go to Thailand for massage training when she was 19.

How many did Virginia recruit and traffic for Epstein over two years?
Is it easy for you to whitewash her and the other traffickers sick crimes?
I bet if she trafficked someone you knew, you’d change your tune.

You're bending over backwards to hate women instead of focusing on the predators who built and ran the abuse machine.

"She was 19" doesn't magically undo years of grooming, manipulation, and psychological damage.

That's not freedom, that's conditioning, plain and simple.

You keep acting like coercion only counts if there's a gun involved.

Not quite sure what that's about.

But it seems rather childish, never mind downright disingenuous.

And the way you seem to be fixating on blaming women while soft pedaling what men in power clearly perpetrate speaks volumes. 

It's beginning to sound like this isn't about justice to you at all.

But more about punishing women you don't like.

I'm afraid your attitude stinks.

Absolutely deplorable. 

So on that note, im away for a breath of fresh air...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Release All Files! - Part 2 LightAngel 1,593 64,843 06-16-2026, 06:31 AM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Ghislaine Maxwell friend named in Epstein files found dead by suicide Waterglass 4 548 03-04-2026, 03:06 PM
Last Post: Byrd
  The True Coverup - Atlantis and the Epstein Files sahgwa 9 991 02-06-2026, 04:33 PM
Last Post: ARM1968
  Epstein files prosecutions, anything? Encia22 0 353 02-02-2026, 06:12 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  If Trump Admin. Redact Epstein Files, 'It Will Be Clear They Are Hiding Something' LightAngel 92 5,554 12-28-2025, 10:23 PM
Last Post: Knows
  Vaush goes through the files! SleipnirTheHorse 29 2,016 12-21-2025, 09:48 AM
Last Post: KrustyKrab
  The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files BeTheGoddess 30 1,804 11-20-2025, 09:27 AM
Last Post: quintessentone
  Will The National Security Of The USA Card be Played on Release of Epstein Files? Waterglass 15 957 09-14-2025, 03:01 AM
Last Post: Heiden
  Judge rejects Trump administration request to release Jeffrey Epstein grand jury docu BeTheGoddess 23 1,518 08-21-2025, 11:15 AM
Last Post: andy06shake
  WSJ: Trump on Epstein files pianopraze 4 603 07-23-2025, 06:41 PM
Last Post: xuenchen