No Kings 2.0

[DBCowboy]

Then I would suggest to you that you advise Byrd and RuchardH to just ignore your posts in the future because a proper discussion can never be had.

I wish they would.

They, like you, just spout communist talking points.

*shrugs*

[WallFlowerActive]

Then I would suggest to you that you advise Byrd and RuchardH to just ignore your posts in the future because a proper discussion can never be had.

Then provide actual facts.  Not get emotional over sources. How many reporters give up their “sources”.

[quintessentone]

I wish they would.

They, like you, just spout communist talking points.

*shrugs*

Well that's not true. We just ask you to provide sources and then this is what we get.

[WallFlowerActive]

Nobody said anything about a lie here. You are jumping into a discussion that you haven't a clue what the subject matter is.

Then provide actual facts.

[quintessentone]

Then provide actual facts.

About what? I don't know what you are going on about.

[DBCowboy]

Well that's not true. We just ask you to provide sources and then this is what we get.

I write opinions based on multiple sources.

CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NEWSMAX, even HuffPoo.

  ​​​​​​​

[WallFlowerActive]

About what? I don't know what you are going on about.

We know the liberal game though.  Use emotion and innuendo to avoid having to use actual facts and address what was actually asked.

[quintessentone]

I write opinions based on multiple sources.

CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NEWSMAX, even HuffPoo.

 

Then why not post the exact sources when asked for my members?

[WallFlowerActive]

Then why not post the exact sources when asked for my members?

How about cite a source showing the opposite if you think it’s erroneous.

[quintessentone]

How about cite a source showing the opposite if you think it’s erroneous.

I won't respond to you again as you have the wrong end of the stick and I'm afraid you may poke your eye out with it.