New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[FlyersFan]

Indeed, but that's hardly an excuse for executing people trying to flee and then calling it self-defence. 

She wasn't 'executed'.
That's hyperbolic loaded language.
She suffered the consequence of her actions.
And she wasn't just trying to flee (which was breaking the law).
She tried to run over a LEO.
His action was self defense.

[andy06shake]

She weaponized her car. 

Does the car do Bruce Lee one-inch punches? 

Anything can be considered a weapon.

Not exactly an excuse to shoot a woman in the head, so....

[FlyersFan]

No need to shoot people over what amounts to a disagreement to stop.

It wasn't a 'disagreement to stop'.
You are downplaying what the situation was.
She was detained and broke the law when leaving.
But she was shot because she tried to run over a LEO.

[FlyersFan]

Poor w

I don't know what that means.

[andy06shake]

She wasn't 'executed'.
That's hyperbolic loaded language.
She suffered the consequence of her actions.
And she wasn't just trying to flee (which was breaking the law).
She tried to run over a LEO.
His action was self defense.

Poor woman is dead by the hands of Mr ICE man.

Just a fact.

It happened, and it's on video for all to see.

Witnesses and everything if they are ever allowed to present their accounts in a court.

Spin it anyway you please.

People see it for what it was, and that's death by ICE via a shot to the face.

But, but, but self-defense.

Is that what real men do?

[putnam6]

And little sissy babies who can't control their anger should not be in positions of law enforcement.

It's clear in the video, he did not draw his weapon till her tires spun, and he was hit immediately while he was in front of the left side of the hood.

This could be why the entry shot through the windshield was so low that he buckled over as he was hit

if he was standing upright and okay, the angle of the shot would have been higher up and a downward motion instead of lower on the windshield 

All of this will be evident when the trajectories of the shots are investigated. I could easily see a state trial moved to a rural area if they can even file charges, and it gets presented to a grand jury

Of course, it all depends on whether Minnesota still has any funds left to press charges 

[andy06shake]

I don't know what that means.

It been a glitch on my end.

Apologies and removed.

[Kurokage]

A few example of protests... 
https://www.freedomforum.org/famous-protests/

Boston Tea Party | Dec. 16, 1773The Boston Tea Party is one of the most famous protests of colonial times.
In Massachusetts in 1773, American colonists were upset about British tax policies, particularly on tea. On Dec. 16, a group of colonists put on paint, feathers and blankets to look like Indigenous people. They went to the harbor and dumped tea from a British ship into the water.
But England did not change the tax policies. Instead, it closed the harbor.
The First Amendment did not exist yet. If it had, destroying someone else’s tea would not have been a protected way to protest.
Later, the nation’s founders put the right to petition into the First Amendment. They wanted to be sure people had an outlet to share their views.

Coxey’s Army | March-July 1894In 1894, the United States was in a depression. Activists Jacob Coxey and Carl Browne wanted the government to provide jobs for the unemployed. They led a group to Washington, D.C., to ask for help. The group became known as Coxey’s Army.
Politicians and the media described Coxey’s Army as tramps and vagrants. They were considered dangerous. Camped near the city, they tried to hold protests for nearly two months.
Since 1882, speeches and protests at the U.S. Capitol were illegal. Coxey was arrested for walking on the grass and having a “banner,” which was just a pin on his jacket.  He was also stopped from giving a speech at the Capitol building.
Soon it became clear that no policy would change. The protesters were forced to leave when the Virginia militia burned their camp down.
Some politicians feared that such protests would become an American habit. They were right.
Fifty years after this first march on Washington became a famous protest, Coxey was invited to the Capitol to finish his speech.

Kent State Shootings | May 4, 1970Four students at Kent State University died and nine were hurt when they were shot by Ohio National Guard members during a protest of the Vietnam War. The incident shocked people and showed divisions over the war. A photograph of the aftermath won the 1971 Pulitzer Prize.
The war was unpopular, but U.S. involvement had grown. There was a nationwide student strike. Disturbances at Kent State starting on May 1 led the National Guard to be called in.
On the evening of May 2, an officer training program building was burned down. Tensions grew.
On May 4, a crowd gathered to protest the war and the National Guard presence.
Authorities ordered the crowd to leave. Some students yelled and threw rocks.
Guard members began firing into the air, ground and crowd; the reason why remains disputed. Four students died: One was shot in the back; one was on her way to class. Of the nine students hurt, one was paralyzed.
Kent State faculty marshals quickly moved in to prevent more violence. Classes did not resume for months. Students across the country protested in response.
A court later said orders to ban the rally were legal. During investigations, Guard members said they fired in self-defense because students were coming toward them threateningly. One federal case against eight guard members was dismissed. Another case was settled out of court.

Most of these protests were deemed wrong at the time, were would America be without some of them?

[andy06shake]

It wasn't a 'disagreement to stop'.
You are downplaying what the situation was.
She was detained and broke the law when leaving.
But she was shot because she tried to run over a LEO.

Im mearly saying what I saw.

And that's a socalled man shoot a woman in the face because she did not wish to stop, then claim self defence.

If the law warrants murder for such, oh dear. 

I wonder who will be next to ""assault"" someone at less than 3mph, from less than a foot away, and get dead for their troubles?.....

[Kurokage]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...a8a49f.jpg]

It's clear in the video, he did not draw his weapon till her tires spun, and he was hit immediately while he was in front of the left side of the hood.

This could be why the entry shot through the windshield was so low that he buckled over as he was hit

if he was standing upright and okay, the angle of the shot would have been higher up and a downward motion instead of lower on the windshield 

All of this will be evident when the trajectories of the shots are investigated. I could easily see a state trial moved to a rural area if they can even file charges, and it gets presented to a grand jury

Of course, it all depends on whether Minnesota still has any funds left to press charges 

That's not exactly correct.