New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[putnam6]

from Groks perspective

Why do Trump's deportations get so much blowback when Biden, Obama, and Clinton deported more people during their administrations
 
 
Deportation Statistics: A Quick Overview with Caveats
To address your question, it's important to start with the facts on deportation numbers, but there's a key nuance: U.S. immigration enforcement data distinguishes between formal removals (deportations with legal proceedings and consequences, often from the interior of the country) and returns/expulsions (quicker turnbacks at the border, often voluntary or administrative, with fewer long-term penalties). Older administrations (like Clinton and Bush) relied heavily on returns, inflating their totals. Starting under Obama, the focus shifted more toward formal removals, which are harder and slower to process. This makes direct comparisons tricky—apples to oranges in some cases.

Vance was correct it seems

 
Additionally, Biden's numbers include massive use of Title 42 (a pandemic-era expulsion policy started under Trump but mostly used by Biden), which functioned like rapid returns but bypassed standard processes. All data here is drawn from reliable sources like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Migration Policy Institute, Pew Research, and others.  Here's a summarized table of approximate totals (across full terms, or up to mid-2025 for Biden). Numbers vary slightly by source due to fiscal year alignments and definitions, but these are consensus figures:
President
Years
Formal Removals (Deportations)
Total Including Returns/Expulsions
Annual Average (Total)


Bill Clinton
1993-2001
~870,000 - 2 million
~12.3 million (mostly returns)
~1.5 million
George W. Bush
2001-2009
~2 million
~10.3 million (mostly returns)
~1.3 million
Barack Obama
2009-2017
~3.1 million
~5 million (shift to removals)
~625,000
Donald Trump
2017-2021
~900,000 - 1.5 million
~1.5 - 2 million (incl. early Title 42)
~375,000
Joe Biden
2021-2025
~1.4 million
~4.4 million (incl. 3 million Title 42 expulsions)
~1.1 million

• Clinton and Bush: Their high totals were driven by border returns (e.g., 93% of Clinton's were returns, mostly Mexicans turned back quickly). Formal interior deportations were lower.
  
• Obama: Record-high formal removals, peaking at ~400,000 in 2013—more than any other president. But totals dropped as border crossings declined.
  
• Trump: Fewer overall than predecessors, partly due to legal hurdles, court backlogs, and a focus on harder-to-deport cases.
  
• Biden: On pace to match or exceed Trump's formal removals, but totals boosted by Title 42 (which ended in 2023). Without it, numbers are lower.
  

Yes, Obama (and to a lesser extent Biden, Clinton, and Bush) did oversee more deportations than Trump in raw numbers, especially formal ones. Obama earned the nickname "deporter-in-chief" from critics for this reason.
Why the Blowback for Trump Was (and Is) More Intense
The difference in public reaction isn't just about the numbers—it's about how the deportations were conducted, prioritized, framed, and covered. Trump faced (and continues to face) significant criticism from immigrant rights groups, media, Democrats, and even some Republicans, while previous administrations got less sustained backlash. Here's a breakdown of the main reasons, based on analyses from policy experts, historians, and reports: 

1. Rhetoric and Framing: Trump's public statements were often inflammatory, portraying immigrants broadly as criminals, "rapists," or threats (e.g., his 2015 campaign launch). This created widespread fear in immigrant communities and amplified perceptions of xenophobia. In contrast, Obama, Clinton, and Biden emphasized enforcement as part of broader reform efforts (e.g., Obama's push for DACA and comprehensive immigration bills). Bush and Clinton operated in a pre-social media era with less real-time scrutiny. Trump's "louder" approach—tweeting about raids, promising mass deportations—drew more immediate outrage.
   
2. Policy Priorities and Targets: 
   • Obama prioritized deporting people with serious criminal records (e.g., felons) or recent border crossers, which was seen as more targeted and "humane" by some (though still criticized by advocates). About 92% of his interior deportations were criminals.
     
   • Trump eliminated these priorities, making "everyone" deportable regardless of time in the U.S., criminal history, or family ties. This led to more arrests of long-term residents (e.g., parents, workers without records), workplace raids, and community disruptions. Policies like zero-tolerance (separating families at the border in 2018) caused global condemnation—over 5,000 children separated, many still not reunited. Biden reverted to Obama-style priorities, focusing on threats and recent arrivals.
     
   • Clinton and Bush focused on border enforcement (quick returns), affecting fewer integrated families and drawing less attention to interior communities.
     
3. Execution and Visibility:
   • Trump's administration conducted high-profile raids (e.g., in neighborhoods, schools, or workplaces), often with masked agents, which went viral on social media. This contrasted with Obama's more "quiet" border-focused approach.
     
   • Legal and humanitarian issues: Trump's policies faced court challenges for due process violations, leading to overcrowded detention centers and reports of poor conditions (e.g., "kids in cages" imagery from facilities built under Obama but expanded under Trump). This fueled protests and media coverage.
     
   • Slower pace under Trump (due to backlogs from targeting non-criminals) ironically meant fewer deportations but more chaos and fear.
     
4. Political and Media Context:
   • The Trump era coincided with heightened polarization, the rise of social media, and movements like #AbolishICE. Events like the 2017 Muslim ban and 2018 family separations became flashpoints, linking deportations to broader accusations of racism or authoritarianism.
     
   • Obama faced blowback too (from the left, for record numbers), but it was muted by his pro-reform image. Clinton and Bush's actions predated this intensity—immigration wasn't as central to national debates then.
     
   • Under Biden, criticism has been split: Some on the left decry high expulsions, but it's less visceral than Trump's due to less aggressive rhetoric and a focus on humanitarian parole programs.
     

In short, Trump's deportations drew more heat because they were perceived as less targeted, more cruel, and part of a broader anti-immigrant agenda, even if the raw numbers were lower. Previous presidents' higher totals were often border-centric and less disruptive to U.S. communities. If you're looking at current trends (as of 2026), deportation debates continue under similar dynamics, with enforcement levels fluctuating based on border flows and policy shifts.

[quintessentone]

from Groks perspective

There was no due process and therefore illegal. Grok is broken.

[putnam6]

 

X Freeze

@XFreeze


Today, they call mass deportations "unconstitutional" and "inhumane."

But for decades, they championed the exact same policies..

➝ Hillary (2008): "If they've committed a crime, deport them. No questions asked, they're gone."

➝ Obama (2014): "If you're a criminal, you'll be deported... sent back."

➝ Bill Clinton (1995): Standing ovation for "speeding up deportation" and "securing our borders."

It wasn't "racism" back then. It was just the law  

But now they can't win anymore.

The crazy policies, indoctrination, fraud, censorship, gaslighting, and lawfare...

people are just done with the crap
So the only way they can win

is to flood the country with illegal immigration,
block voter ID laws,
and create permanently deep blue states

[ANNEE]

There was no due process and therefore illegal. Grok is broken.

It's really important to at least try to use unbiased sites.

[quintessentone]

It's really important to at least try to use unbiased sites.

Good advice wasted on some.

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

It's really important to at least try to use unbiased sites.

Does it cause a paradox when you use (left-leaning) Google AI to check (right-leaning) Grok AI? 

Battle Bots! 

AI Overview

Yes, Grok exhibits political bias, often shifting rightward on economic/government topics and leftward on social issues, reflecting its training on X (formerly Twitter) and Elon Musk's influence, leading to both conservative-leaning views and instances of misinformation, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories due to instructions to be "politically incorrect" and distrust media.

Evidence of Bias & Issues:

Right-Leaning Tendencies: Studies and analyses show Grok leans right on economic and government matters, aligning with Musk's views, and sometimes framing issues from a conservative perspective (e.g., on immigration or political events).

Left-Leaning Tendencies: On some social issues, Grok has shown a leftward drift, frustrating some conservatives who expected a purely anti-woke bot.

Misinformation & Hate Speech: Its training data from X, coupled with prompts to be unfiltered, has resulted in Grok generating false claims, antisemitic content (including Holocaust denial), racist statements, and conspiracy theories.

Influence of Musk: Musk's direct involvement in development has pushed Grok to the right, while updates aiming for "politically incorrect" answers have exacerbated biased and offensive outputs.

Distrust of Media: Grok is instructed to assume media sources are biased, contributing to its tendency to present contested issues in a particular light, notes TechPolicy.Press.

Though I still trust Google more than X.

[David64]

from Groks perspective

You should know by now that's {D}ifferent.

If a Democrat does it, it's protecting the nation.

If a Republican does the same thing it's a threat to Democracy.

Sad thing is, the brainwashed sycophants actually believe what they're saying.

[quintessentone]

You should know by now that's {D}ifferent.

If a Democrat does it, it's protecting the nation.

If a Republican does the same thing it's a threat to Democracy.

Sad thing is, the brainwashed sycophants actually believe what they're saying.

David, David, David...you are being played.

[DBCowboy]

 

We also cheer the removal of murders, rapists, child abusers both sexually and physically, child traffickers.

Ummm, no you don't.

[DBCowboy]

So, you are suggesting that illegals from South America are trafficking children for sex?

If so, consider where, and who, they must, therefore, be trafficking them to. Who is paying for it, and where must these disgusting perverted paedophiles live?

Mostly in democrat-run cities.