Lou Elizondo (supposedly) knows where UFO located.

[pianopraze]

PAX river Navy base.

true or BS?

a lot of maybe’s with this one. Daily Mail is questionable also.

use lots of salt with this one, but if true it’s huge.

posted on Vetted 1 hour ago:

[quintessentone]

Hey, nice to see you here.

[pianopraze]

Hey, nice to see you here.

Thank you.

Still monitoring ufo things but mostly focused on writing books and posting on twitter to grow audience and sell books :)




Finished the Vetted episode, I can poke a lot of holes in what he says but he raises great questions. Maybe just a little overly negative.

[quintessentone]

Thank you.

Still monitoring ufo things but mostly focused on writing books and posting on twitter to grow audience and sell books :)




Finished the Vetted episode, I can poke a lot of holes in what he says but he raises great questions. Maybe just a little overly negative.

They are out there, I am sure about that.

I want contact, now.

[FULCRUM331]

No he does not. This aging mid life crisis actor has had his 15 minutes and is struggling to stay in the spotlight. This will repeat until he is finally crooked off the stage. 

He, and many other new faces are all paid liars spinning up the UFO community. I have watched the pattern of sensationalists and mentally ill hoaxers for the last 50 years do the same thing over and over again to where I stopped listening to any of these phonies and started gathering my own intelligence, photos and videos when I can.

I do not need my "government" to tell me what is real or what is in the skies. Anyone who has paid attention to the media for the last 5 years let alone 50 should know by now that our government rules by deception and fiat.

So when I see anything with Spanky McUFChode I already know it is an exploding dungpile.

Believe whatever you like. You have the right to do so. I simply will not be bothered by this card carrying actor and fraud my government pays to lie to the gullible.

[Raptured]

No he does not. This aging mid life crisis actor has had his 15 minutes and is struggling to stay in the spotlight. This will repeat until he is finally crooked off the stage. 

Summed up my opinion perfectly

[Maxmars]

I feel almost ashamed to admit it...

The shame comes from the fact that I do think the entire topic and subject is highly important...
I do want it taken seriously and without b/s "production and narrative" "art" within it...

But ever since the "tic tac" "viral fury" and Elizondo's voice within it...
I just don't feel comfortable relying on him as a source.

No denigration, or slight offered to someone who is literally "in" the "UFO/PARANORMAL" entertainment industry.

The production and presentation of certain "talking head celebrities" ARE THE VALUE... not the information they often re-report with 'great background music' and classy 'editorial gimmickry.'

I don't 'lean into' many "public speakers" who are 'produced' by "companies" and "agencies."

What he is saying however... could be that this is an issue and potential fact to contend with... after that comes the tap dance... (long ago choreographed by someone.)

I love the thread ... but the title strikes me as particularly pointing towards "(supposedly)" and righteously so, in my opinion.

Assuming that's the point... and not about 'actual' physical evidence and where it's located....

or is it?

Wonderful conversation fodder! 

[KKLoco]

Lue has done absolutely nothing for ufology but live up to his counter intelligence background. Why would anyone believe a person that excelled in the use of torture for the purpose of information extraction.

Lue caters to the newbies interested in the topic. I saw straight through his BS on day one back in 2017. Only a fool would buy one of his books. Everyone needs to stop looking to government stooges for truthful disclosure.

[pianopraze]

But ever since the "tic tac" "viral fury" and Elizondo's voice within it...
I just don't feel comfortable relying on him as a source.

I love the thread ... but the title strikes me as particularly pointing towards "(supposedly)" and righteously so, in my opinion.

Assuming that's the point... and not about 'actual' physical evidence and where it's located....

or is it?

Wonderful conversation fodder! 

Sorry about tittle..  the Vetted title felt misleading… plus I let my skepticism get to me. Plus the info is not that a ufo was ever there but that the hanger was supposedly built for the Bigelow ufo transfer so again… misleading.


Plus plus plus … lol am I repeating myself?

[Maxmars]

Sorry about tittle..  the Vetted title felt misleading… plus I let my skepticism get to me. Plus the info is not that a ufo was ever there but that the hanger was supposedly built for the Bigelow ufo transfer so again… misleading.


Plus plus plus … lol am I repeating myself?

No apologies necessary...

"Titles" are most often crafted by an 'editor' which - takes 'control' of the final 'product.'
Therein comes the 'hook and bait' or the 'flash of red.'

Of course, any reference to "Bigelow" in regards to his UFO empire, peaks my interest...
it might an angle to explore from Mr. E's previous talks...
but I'm not versed like you all are...