(03-31-2026, 10:05 PM)Solvedit Wrote: Nazism was full of the poorest, most desperate Germans. Hitler never won more than 33% of the popular vote.
The Nazi party platform is full of things like redistributing the department stores and preventing the gentrification of German land. I'd say the far left is unilaterally, extra-politically often involved in redistributing the department stores.
The far left is evolving. It has learned to form coalitions and create a unified PC identity from a coalition of various identities. They are still using identity politics just like the Nazis except for inclusivity. Identity is still being used as a path to entitlement. They do often have thugs rioting in the streets and intimidating people into ideological conformity, just like the Sturmabteilung.
Many claim the Nazi state was all about corporations. This is not true. Would the reds under Lenin have built up design bureaus and factories from scratch if they had had a wealth of well-run, effective corporations to socialize? They probably would have done as Hitler did. German companies in the Nazi state got to keep their name and management but had to work for the state and include a Nazi officer on their board of directors. Corporate profit was redirected into improving the industry for the interests of the state, and for universal employment.
Mmmkay. Let's have a different perspective -- I lived in post-war Germany in the 1950's and 1960's. My dad was in the Army, so we were part of the Occupation, so let me address some of your points (before going into the platform) from personal (and research) foundations.
* Hitler won 43.9% of the popular vote (Wikipedia and other sources)
* Nazis were not "poorest and most desperate", nor were these people necessarily voting Nazi.
* The difference between actual Nazis and many of the Germans is similar to the difference between MAGA and Republicans. Many liked some of the policies but felt the Nazis were too extreme.
* Also note that the Nazis were interested in "racial purity" (no race/culture mixing) and even had a breeding program to produce the "perfect German" -- tall, strong, blonde, very intelligent. My late father-in-law met one of the children born in this program and said the guy was impressive.
Now, let's take a look at the Nazi party platform (both in the past and in the present):
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/e...%20Germany.
I am looking at "things that are in the party platform" not "things some loudmouth is saying." I also assume that Trump's executive orders reflect Republican policy.
For the sake of "let's not lumber the site with unnecessary verbiage, I'm just going to refer to each of the official platform statements (there are 25) by number. The link up there will give the exact wording.
#1 - not anything in any Democratic party platform. It "sorta" sounds like something MAGA might like, but AFIK it's not officially Republican, either.
#2 - not anything in any Democratic platform. However, it's something Trump favors.
#3 - most certainly not Democratic. But... it does sound like Trump and the "oil situation."
#4 - Republican (ICE raids of anyone who "looks" foreign)
#5 - Republican.
#6 - both parties, actually. Republicans support the first statement, Democrats the second (consider who Trump is appointing and who he appointed in his first term (and all the scandals there.))
#7 - both parties. Democrats obviously support the first (though I'm sure Republicans do as well) but only the Republicans support deportation as a method of creating more jobs. I'm not sure that they stop to consider that these jobs are things like "picking grapes" and "janitor" and "bedpan cleaner."
#8 - Republican.
#9 - Democrats do support the Equal Rights Amendment.
#10 - Not a platform point for either party.
#11 - Neither party is running on "no interest on loans."
#12 - Neither party is running on "confiscate all war profits."
#13 - Neither party is for nationalization of companies. Both seem to be rather explicitly against it.
#14 - Profit-sharing ... Neither is explicitly for it, but Democrats are more likely to favor it.
#15 - Social security. Yep. All on the Democrats here.
#16 - Mixed bag here. Both want a healthy middle class, neither wants department stores communalized, both want opportunities for small businesses to bid in government contracts.
#17 - Another mixed bag. Both dislike land (think "housing") speculation, but Democrats are more likely to want to rein in the big house-and-apartment buying conglomerates (some of which are owned by foreigners.) Both parties are not much in favor of
eminent domain (though this depends on the situation), which is actually written into the Constitution.
#18 - Republicans tend to favor outcomes that punish with death.
#19 - Republicans are most likely to favor "Biblical-based law"
#20 - both parties, to some extent.
#21 - Democrats
#22 - Not applicable
#23 - Republican (see Trump orders/executive orders on who can report news.)
#24 - Both...but watch out for that "doesn't offend the German race" clause. If you say "White Christians" then it goes to the Republicans.
#25 - Both, but weakly.
So, tallying it up, neither party has a lock on "being like the Nazi party."
5 of the items are "neither party"
5 are "both parties"
2 are "mixed bag" with both parties supporting some part of what was said.
3 are Democratic Party legislative items
6 are Republican legislative issues
2 are "weakly Republican" -- have shown up in legislation/Trump talking points
2 are Trump agenda items, though I'm not ready to say they're Republican agendas.
1 is "Not applicable"
So... while there are loudmouths in each party who espouse all or most of the above, neither party has a lock on "Nazi agenda" as their platform. Some items (Social security, free education) are popular in almost all First World countries. Some items are popular with both parties. Some are universally rejected by both parties.