12-27-2025, 07:50 AM
I remember her throwing a hissy fit about people who said she was cute and perky.
|
12-27-2025, 07:50 AM
I remember her throwing a hissy fit about people who said she was cute and perky.
12-27-2025, 08:21 AM
(12-27-2025, 07:08 AM)andy06shake Wrote: I think we should all just get "the facts." I think with the current political polarization and the mix of one's moral judgment directly connected to ego, getting the facts is an exercise in looking at (not exploring) all the facts then taking a defensive knee jerk stance back to one's respective corner. It looks like it just can't be done in any objective way.
"The only journey is the one within."
12-27-2025, 09:48 AM
Here is the podcast
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ka...0742432933 I listened to some Skipping through It is insipid Apple podcasts always are Why is that Also no transcripts Which sucks
12-27-2025, 10:30 AM
This post was last modified: 12-27-2025, 10:31 AM by quintessentone. 
(12-26-2025, 10:25 AM)marshun Wrote: Katie Couric spoke out against "bothsidesism" in news coverage and insisted people don't want "just the facts" in the current media environment. It's clear to me that these types of award-winning, very popular, seasoned media journalists/personalities that criticize Trump or his actions, in any way, elicit, first and foremost, defensive attitudes from the MAGA and right, which is a shame that they are unable to even consider another possibility behind Trump's true goals - not anti-war, not helping the working class, not releasing the Epstein files, etc. as were his campaign promises. I'm not sure why that's okay with some MAGA, it's nonsensical because she also criticized Kamala Harris over her word salads. And, boy oh boy, is she popular. Katie Couric Daily Popularity Stats | Attentionocracy So I can only surmise that because she is so very popular and has a platform where she tries to find out Trump's true motives, and also some Democrat motives, that a smear campaign must now be waged against her and others like her.
"The only journey is the one within."
12-27-2025, 10:38 AM
(12-27-2025, 10:30 AM)quintessentone Wrote: ....a smear campaign must now be waged against her and others like her. No. She just sucks. Totally partisan like most so called 'journalists'. She thinks people want to hear her partisan opinions rather than just straight facts. She's full of herself. That's not 'smear' .... that's just reality.
12-27-2025, 10:47 AM
(12-27-2025, 10:30 AM)quintessentone Wrote: It's clear to me that these types of award-winning, very popular, seasoned media journalists/personalities that criticize Trump or his actions, in any way, elicit, first and foremost, defensive attitudes from the MAGA and right, which is a shame that they are unable to even consider another possibility behind Trump's true goals - not anti-war, not helping the working class, not releasing the Epstein files, etc. as were his campaign promises. I'm not sure why that's okay with some MAGA, it's nonsensical because she also criticized Kamala Harris over her word salads. What has she brought to the table as a journalist? Her product seems to be herself, as a "presenter". She presents facts in an interpreted worldview that makes her viewers feel good about themselves, and informed. All with an admixture of capitalist grift and product sales. She's quite open about it in the podcast discussion. I don't really have a grudge against her, so I won't go so far as to call her a mid-wit whore. She's simply not relevant to me. She's #4808 on the list of people valuable to the attention-economy that you linked to. It's fun to read the most valuable: https://attentionocracy.com/top/people Again, I'm not saying we would have a better society if that list was instead the waiting line for the woodchipper. But I suppose folks can have their opinions.
12-27-2025, 10:52 AM
(12-27-2025, 08:21 AM)quintessentone Wrote: I think with the current political polarization and the mix of one's moral judgment directly connected to ego, getting the facts is an exercise in looking at (not exploring) all the facts then taking a defensive knee jerk stance back to one's respective corner. It looks like it just can't be done in any objective way. That boils down to the fact that being truly objective means risking being wrong or uncomfortable. And most people don't like to feel uncomfortable or wrong.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
12-27-2025, 10:55 AM
(12-27-2025, 10:52 AM)andy06shake Wrote: That boils down to the fact that being truly objective means risking being wrong or uncomfortable. Well, as I said in a subsequent post that Couric did criticize Harris' word salad type delivery, which would indicate that she was willing to go both ways. But, you are right and I am right, that ego plays a big part in rejecting someone like her who tries to make both sides look at motives and context.
"The only journey is the one within."
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|