Jack Smith testifies to Congress

[David64]

He's an over aggressive prosecutor, with a history of stacking charges to get plea deals. He had no problem with shady tactics and "judge shopping" to get what he wanted. 

That's why he was hand picked by Garland.

[ANNEE]

He's an over aggressive prosecutor, with a history of stacking charges to get plea deals. He had no problem with shady tactics and "judge shopping" to get what he wanted. 

That's why he was hand picked by Garland.

Says some Right Wing opinion.

The Right has no credibility when it comes to Trump.

Let me know when you find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides.  Pros and Cons.

[fwki]

Says some Right Wing opinion.

The Right has no credibility when it comes to Trump.

Let me know when you find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides.  Pros and Cons.

Don't need the world wide web's "learned" opinion after four years of watching this corrupt prosecutor shame himself capped by a sickening appearance in front of Congress. You're the one who said you don't know jack about him. I can trust my eyes and ears because I didn't have my head in sand.

[ANNEE]

Don't need the world wide web's "learned" opinion after four years of watching this corrupt prosecutor shame himself capped by a sickening appearance in front of Congress. You're the one who said you don't know jack about him. I can trust my eyes and ears because I didn't have my head in sand.

A big four years -- in childish/vindictive/narcissist Trump land.

Trumpets have zero objectivity.  Opinions are not credible.

------------------------------------------------------

I do not know Jack Smith.  I am watching and following the trial. 

It's now in the hands of the legal system.  What happens happens.

[David64]

Says some Right Wing opinion.

The Right has no credibility when it comes to Trump.

Let me know when you find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides.  Pros and Cons.

You say you don't know anything about him, but you're quick to dismiss anything that shows him in a bad light.

Before you defend him, you should do your own research. If you can't be bothered, you have no credibility on this subject and should refrain from dismissing others comments.

[ANNEE]

You say you don't know anything about him, but you're quick to dismiss anything that shows him in a bad light.

Before you defend him, you should do your own research. If you can't be bothered, you have no credibility on this subject and should refrain from dismissing others comments.

I dismiss anything that comes from the Right Wing in regard to Trump.

There is no credibility without objectivity.

They have zero objectivity with anything that has to do with Trump.

Find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides -- pro and con.

[David64]

I dismiss anything that comes from the Right Wing in regard to Trump.

There is no credibility without objectivity.

They have zero objectivity with anything that has to do with Trump.

Find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides -- pro and con.

Trump Trump Trump

You just can't help yourself, can you ? 

In case you missed it, the subject is Jack Smith. Not Trump.

[ANNEE]

Trump Trump Trump

You just can't help yourself, can you ? 

In case you missed it, the subject is Jack Smith. Not Trump.

Sure.

[RazorV66]

I dismiss anything that comes from the Right Wing in regard to Trump.

There is no credibility without objectivity.

They have zero objectivity with anything that has to do with Trump.

Find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides -- pro and con.

There's no words anymore to descibe you Liberals.

What objectivity do you have looking through your Liberal glasses? 

NONE AT ALL to go along with no credibility.

[ANNEE]

There's no words anymore to descibe you Liberals.

What objectivity do you have looking through your Liberal glasses? 

NONE AT ALL to go along with no credibility.

Such an intelligent post.

Everyone Left of what you believe is Liberal.

Now there's objectivity for ya.